×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Net Uplift on Steel Joist

Net Uplift on Steel Joist

Net Uplift on Steel Joist

(OP)
When specifying net uplift pressure on steel joist, do any of you indicate design approach (say ASD) or the exact load combination (say 0.6D+W) used to arrive at that value. With SJI promoting both LRFD and ASD for the design of steel joists, isn't it misleading for the joist designer to not have this info. Any thoughts on this??

RE: Net Uplift on Steel Joist

Section 5.11 of Joist Spec (K series in this instance) requires you to indicate design methodology. So you would say Net Uplift = 15psf (ASD) or something similar.

If you have anything more than typical uniform gravity and wind uplift loading, I would recommend creating a table with each load case separately defined and letting the joist manufacturer combine the loads.

RE: Net Uplift on Steel Joist

This isn't just an issue in the US where you're using both methods. For a lot of contractor/specialty engineered items there can be confusion between specified and factored loads. Personally, I think it's important to explicitly state the type of load every time you mention it (not just hidden in the notes) and also, where necessary, provide service *and* factored loads or a way to convert between them. That way the specialty engineer can properly apply loads for strength and servicability as necessary and they don't have to guess or over factor.

In Canada it's most confusing when dealing with geotechs or foundation work. That part of the industry is slowly shifting towards working with factored loads, so depending on the company they'll default to different things.

This is really a situation where a few words can save everyone a world of headaches.

RE: Net Uplift on Steel Joist

Yes, make it clear it is an ALLOWABLE load. And I agree, wind loading should be provided as an allowable or service load rather than strength. (old school)

RE: Net Uplift on Steel Joist

The more I use factored loads, the more I like un-factored.

To me, there are just too many places to make a mistake with factored loads, and they are constantly changing.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: Net Uplift on Steel Joist

(OP)
Thanks for the input guys. I have decided to modify my steel joist notes to read as below.

"Net uplift pressures on roof joists as indicated in the drawings is based on 0.6D+W load combination"

RE: Net Uplift on Steel Joist

I agree with Mike. I still do all of my design in ASD except concrete.
Serviceability controls most of my designs anyway so why should I do the extra work?

RE: Net Uplift on Steel Joist

AISC's ASD method is more of a simplified version of LRFD now anyway, it's not like it used to be in the 9th edition manual ("Allowable Strength Design" vs "Allowable Stress Design").

RE: Net Uplift on Steel Joist

ASD forever! It actually makes sense.

Strucguy...yes, let 'em know your premise.

RE: Net Uplift on Steel Joist

IBC 2012/ASCE 7-10 changed the load combinations because wind is now based on ultimate strength. So the combination would be 0.6D-0.6W under that code. It's a always a good idea to provide notes if it is factored or unfactored for delegated designs. We have a note for net uplift for joists with the load combination indicating how we arrived at that number.

RE: Net Uplift on Steel Joist

Whoa, this is a big development for me...I didn't know I was allowed to publicly admit that I preferred ASD, especially since the debate has been officially "resolved" in the other direction for many years now. Whoo-hoo! I feel like a free man! No more (well, fewer, anyway) silly load combinations to skinny the design down to a gnats whisker! Especially since, as Excel noted, deflection often controls anyway.

I'll still be prepared to submit calcs in LRFD to demonstrate that I am "competent" but for my own use it's back to ASD. Except for concrete, again, as Excel noted.

RE: Net Uplift on Steel Joist

The LRFD factors don't bring your design down a gnat's whisker. The average factor of safety generally stays about the same. For systems with small dead loads and heavy live loads, you'll actually have a more expensive structure with *more* material using LRFD.

RE: Net Uplift on Steel Joist

Alright fine, but they're a pain to use all in pursuit of the (in my opinion misguided) idea that you can know all dead and live loads to within a gnat's whisker over the life of the structure. Others might feel differently, of course.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources