×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Foundation Stability

Foundation Stability

Foundation Stability

(OP)
When the IBC changed the load combinations that have reduced dead load (0.9DL to 0.6DL +WL or EQ) they also changed the foundation stability factor proportionally from 1.5 to 1.0. This seems to assume that these particular load combinations always govern when it comes to foundation stability, which is not always the case. There are situations where gravity live loads are destabilizing to the foundation, therefore leading to a situation where other load combinations that don’t have a reduced DL govern the stability of the foundation. This creates a design discontinuity between the older and newer load combinations. For example, the LC with 1.0DL + 1.0LL would yield the same overturning moment and sliding forces for the new and old load combinations. If the LL is destabilizing to an extent which this LC governs, the new load combinations have virtually no safety factor, i.e., 1.0, whereas the old LCs would have a safety factor 1.5 requiring a larger foundation. This seems to have been an oversight.

Does anyone have any comments about this apparent discontinuity in design safety?


RE: Foundation Stability

As much as it tries to be, the code can never be a cookbook where you always follow the recipe and you end up with a perfect product. No, you will always have to exercise engineering judgment. This is just a case where an experienced engineer will look at the INTENT of the code and manually provide a higher safety factor for that applied loading. Or, he/she will create a custom load combination to account for it....similar to reducing the dead load factor by 0.6. Something like Stabilizing dead load *0.6 + De-stabilizing dead load*1.0.

RE: Foundation Stability

(OP)
Ya, that's what i've done in the past. It's frustrating when older supposedly "more experienced" engineers beat me over the head for being "too conservative" for compensating for this particular situation. I explain the it to them, but they don't seem to understand; and don't seem to want to. Mostly these are management guys that have been an "engineer" for 30 years but haven't actually designed anything for 20 years.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources