×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

UT weld Testing to Replace RT Testing

UT weld Testing to Replace RT Testing

UT weld Testing to Replace RT Testing

(OP)
I have a client spec. that requires RT Testing of CJP welds, and a fabricator who wants to
use UT Testing instead? I'm wondering if anyone has feedback regarding the reliability of UT testing as compared with RT. Will UT testing miss flaws that would be detected by RT?
Have you had issues with lack of permanent hard copy record from UT Testing?

The application is general structural steel fabrication inspection.

Thanks

RE: UT weld Testing to Replace RT Testing

AWS D1.1 6.13.3.1 (2010 Edition) relates to UT as an alternate to RT. You have not mentioned to which code you are working, but I believe that would be a good place to start.

Although the above reference allows UT of 5/16" thick material, I do not recommend its use below 3/8", as I have found the results to be inconsistent.

RE: UT weld Testing to Replace RT Testing

UT can be as effective as RT. UT can detect flaws in orientations that are not amenable to RT. RT is limited to a "straight through" approach to flaws, meaning that if the flaw is a crack that is parallel to the path of the radiographic beam, it will not be detected. UT does not have this limitation as it can detect lamellar as well as other cracks. Further, there are more limitations on joint geometry with RT than UT.

Any method is operator dependant. Make sure that the person doing the testing is certified. In the US, that certification would typically be at least a Level II ASNT certification.

The reason that there is usually no "hard copy" of the UT results is that it is the operator's interpretation of an oscilliscope image. If you were give an RT film would you be able to interpret that in accordance with the applicable code? Probably not unless you were experienced and certified for RT. You can request a screen shot of the UT image...but it won't tell you much.

UT is much more common and readily available than UT for general structural work. I would have no hesitation to use either for the appropriate application.

Background....former Certified Welding Inspector, ASNT Level 1 UT, ASNT Level 3 radiographer.

RE: UT weld Testing to Replace RT Testing

I concur with Ron's final words.. "I would have no hesitation to use either for the appropriate application." As he stated, each method has it's limitation. Welds come in different flavors: full penetration, fillet, plug, etc. Basically, use the right tool for the right job.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources