×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

API 521: Sum of fire areas for vessels..Sum duties or areas..

API 521: Sum of fire areas for vessels..Sum duties or areas..

API 521: Sum of fire areas for vessels..Sum duties or areas..

(OP)
I'd like a quick check on methods for fire area that should be used under API521 to get overall duty..

I believe if we have a system with two vessels the correct way to consider fire load is as below.

method 1: Q (Total) = 43.2 * F* A1 ^0.82 + 43.2 * F* A2 ^0.82
method 2: i believe this is incorrect.. QTotal = 43.2 * F* {A1+A2} ^0.82

for a vessel with area 50m2
Method 1 gives ~2100 KW
Method 2 gives ~1900 KW

So i believe method 1 is correct. thats what i've been using..but i've come across a calc the other way.. so wanted to check..


RE: API 521: Sum of fire areas for vessels..Sum duties or areas..

If the environmental factor (f) is different for the two vessels, the method-1 is correct and method-2 is incorrect.

If the F factor is the same, then both metods yield the same answer.

It boils down to whether the two vessels have the same type and same thickness of insulation. That's often not the case, so it's better practice to show method-1 in the documentation. That avoids the possibility of errors.

RE: API 521: Sum of fire areas for vessels..Sum duties or areas..

Mathematically method 2 is incorrect if you are deriving method2 from method 1.

RE: API 521: Sum of fire areas for vessels..Sum duties or areas..

Combining the areas and then taking the 0.82 power gives you a less conservative answer. I don't think I've seen this explicitly discussed before but if they are separate vessels, I think I would have a hard time convincing my colleagues to add up all the areas first and then calculate the heat input. Now, if the areas are extremely large where you are pushing the limits of the fire circle you are using, then you could be justified in using the lower value.

If we add an allowance for piping, it's a % of the vessel area so we are basically using method 2. If however we have multiple vessels, we enter the vessels in our spreadsheet and the individual fire relief loads are calculates and then summed rather than summing the areas and then doing the duty calculation so we use both methods smile

As Clint Eastwood put it "do you feel lucky?"

RE: API 521: Sum of fire areas for vessels..Sum duties or areas..

I've always been told the equation is empirical, so it must be evaluated as is for each vessel or component in a vessel, then add the heat duties. Therefore, I always use Method 1.

Good luck,
Latexman

Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers

RE: API 521: Sum of fire areas for vessels..Sum duties or areas..

(OP)
Thanks for your posts.

Agree is is an empirical formula and the adding of pipework area is equally a judgement call some places do this and others don't I've not seen specific guidance on this either.

RE: API 521: Sum of fire areas for vessels..Sum duties or areas..

The ^0.82 in API 521 is there to account for incomplete flame impigement on the vessel wall.
Depending on the layout and geometries, you may have to challenge that ^0.82 (e.g. take ^1 for small cross-section vertical equipments)
So inherently, method 1 is the way to write it down.

RE: API 521: Sum of fire areas for vessels..Sum duties or areas..

(OP)
Thanks RaRo,

I've never seen a factor of 1 used. And, I've looked at calcs for square vessels a factor of A0.82 (A^0.82) was used.

Is it common to use a factor of 1 for sqaure vessels and is that documented in API521 - I've reviewed API 521 several times to update project standards and not come over that detail.

I'd appreciate more comments on this

RE: API 521: Sum of fire areas for vessels..Sum duties or areas..

jamesbanda :

I am sorry not see the method 2 equation you provided, but there is two equations common to see for the fire case in API521

1.For equipment with adequate drainage and fire fighting facility
Q = 43,200 ⋅ F ⋅Aws^0.82

2.For equipment without adequate drainage and fire fighting facility
Q = 70,900 ⋅F ⋅Aws^0.82

Adequate drainage facility here can be defined as the facility that shall be able to carry the flammable/combustible liquid and firewater away from the equipment.
Adequate fire fighting facility can be defined as the facility that shall be activated as soon as the fire begins.
The environmental factor F in equations above and hereafter is the credit factor primarily for fire proofing insulation and not for general thermal insulation.

Hope this can help you a little.
Thank you.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources