×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Beams on the topside of a concrete deck?

Beams on the topside of a concrete deck?

Beams on the topside of a concrete deck?

(OP)
This is a picture of a large parking structure being built on the site next to the one I'm on right now. It has me puzzled because it's a concrete deck over a tunnel(about an 18' span) and it has the concrete beams on the topside of what I reckon is an 8"-12"" deck! The two downsides to this I can think of is you lose the continuous bracing along the top of the beam and more importantly ductile failure. My question is do concrete beams do something similar to compression flange buckling and is ductile failure lost in this set up? I'm having real difficulties coming up with any positives besides aesthetic. I could see it being a little easier to place rebar and form if you're ok with a CJ between the beam and deck.

P.S. A review of the photo make's me curious about how much that longitudinal beam is doing. Is it beneficial bracing than it's detrimental pointloading of the span?

RE: Beams on the topside of a concrete deck?

For relatively shallow concrete beams (which these are), it seems that compression flange bracing is not that much of a concern. As a matter of fact, it has only been in the last couple code cycles (I don't have my code books with me) that lateral bracing has even been mentioned for deep members. And it seems if I remember right, it's not quantified even then. It's kind of mentioned as a good idea.
As far as ductility, if you use the code limits for strain, you should be all right. Beams are designed without top flanges (slabs)all the time. This is no different.

RE: Beams on the topside of a concrete deck?

Agree with Jed. Upstand concrete beams like these are strong in torsion, so don't need bracing at the top like a wide flange steel beam, which is very weak in torsion. Not sure about the longitudinal beam, would have to know more about the design.

RE: Beams on the topside of a concrete deck?

(OP)
Cool, I hadn't made the connection between torsional capacity and buckling before. Maybe they're a little ahead of the Washington bridge designers and that longitudinal beam is to prevent the deck coming down if an oversize truck hits it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources