×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Steel Push Piers vs. St. Helical Piers (in Retrofit Applications)

Steel Push Piers vs. St. Helical Piers (in Retrofit Applications)

Steel Push Piers vs. St. Helical Piers (in Retrofit Applications)

(OP)
When is one more beneficial than the other? I have specified helical piers on several recent projects and contractors often call asking if they can use push piers instead. All of my projects are in the Midwest (Iowa), where we generally have glacial till soils with clays, sand, and gravel, or loess soils over deeper bedrock (can be up to 80 ft. depending on where you are).

The last few projects have been areas of an existing building that we're putting an addition onto, but are not any areas directly related to the addition. These areas have also been brought to our attention during the design phase, so the decision to use these anchors comes after the soil borings have been done, which limits the soils information to what can be extrapolated from borings that may not be as deep as had we known we'd have to use deeper foundations in the first place.

Maybe this is my own misconception, but in my head, helicals are generally a better solution for a retrofit application when the bearing is typically still within cohesive soils, especially when you have less information about the soils below. Push piers are typically better if they can achieve end bearing on bedrock. Around here, it seems that can be much further than required for a helical, which would be more expensive. Both systems claim they can achieve the specified capacity with required factor of safety.

Some of my concern comes from the fact that I'm just not as familiar with push piers, and maybe my thought process is completely backwards. I just want to make sure that I'm making a sound decision, while not avoiding a perfectly good, possibly more economical, solution for clients.

Is there any general rule of thumb that others used in deciding between the two, or is one system more prone to problems than the other?

Thanks in adavance for any and all input.

RE: Steel Push Piers vs. St. Helical Piers (in Retrofit Applications)

i'm in the general camp

New/Repair Construction - push-pins if rock is near, helical if not. just like you said.

for new construction you also want to consider....
Rammed aggregate piers, micropiles, in-place compaction, driven piles, undercut/backfill, etc.....

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources