Shearing (torsion?) forces in a square tube
Shearing (torsion?) forces in a square tube
(OP)
Hi there,
The other day we were in a meeting and this question came up. We had dividing and non clear opinion.
We have some carbon fiber reinforced expoy square tubes. A square of 50 mm side, 0.2 mm thick and 300 mm long. Have a look to the attached picture
http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=4...
Let's say the box is glued to a table (lower face fixed) and we make a force on the upper face.
The first question is if this is just shearing or could be named as torsion.
Then we were discussing why it is so stiff, does it depend on the inertia of the walls? the corners? elastic modulus?
One can have very thick walls, high elastic modulus but paper corners and it would bend...
What do you think??
The other day we were in a meeting and this question came up. We had dividing and non clear opinion.
We have some carbon fiber reinforced expoy square tubes. A square of 50 mm side, 0.2 mm thick and 300 mm long. Have a look to the attached picture
http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=4...
Let's say the box is glued to a table (lower face fixed) and we make a force on the upper face.
The first question is if this is just shearing or could be named as torsion.
Then we were discussing why it is so stiff, does it depend on the inertia of the walls? the corners? elastic modulus?
One can have very thick walls, high elastic modulus but paper corners and it would bend...
What do you think??





RE: Shearing (torsion?) forces in a square tube
i think the stiffness of this tube is determined by the moment ability of the lower corners; part of this will be dependent on the load transfer out of the tube into the supporting plate. once you lose this i think the tube can continue to react the load, reacting the off-set shear with a couple.
of course, the sides have to react transverse shear (as well).
Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
RE: Shearing (torsion?) forces in a square tube
tg
RE: Shearing (torsion?) forces in a square tube
Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
RE: Shearing (torsion?) forces in a square tube
Cheers
Greg Locock
New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?
RE: Shearing (torsion?) forces in a square tube
RE: Shearing (torsion?) forces in a square tube
Thank you for the answers,
But I'm a bit confused;
On one hand we have shearing but everything depending on the corners (so, according to this, the wall thickness-inertia- and elastic modulus don't matter?)
On the other hand bending; I don't see the bending; it's not the typical beam.
The fibers are placed at +/-45º; but this doesn't matter; the question is more general. What is making the square stronger
Thanks to all!
RE: Shearing (torsion?) forces in a square tube
I can’t see your sketch in that png format, but looking at an end view of your tube section; the walls are .2mm thick, the four sides are 50mm in width or height and 300mm long, with a radius at the corners, and the bottom side glued to the table. If you applied a lateral load in the plane of the top side, and parallel to the 300mm length, that would induce a shearing force (reaction force/stress) in the two vert. sides. When you apply a lateral load in the plane of the top side perpendicular to the 300mm length, this causes the tube to parallelogram in shape, the two vert. sides leaning over by theta degrees. This lateral force is resisted by bending moments at the four corners of the tube; and the only shear stress involved is that which is related to this bending, and this was Hokie’s ref. to (portal) rigid frame bending. While your load is sort of a shearing load the way it is applied, it is reacted as a function of the way the shape sees it in each orientation, thus our resistance to calling it ‘shearing.’
The thickness moment of inertia and modulus of elasticity do make a difference, they are what contribute to resisting these moments, rotations and deflections. If these moments where the only thing to worry about wrapping 90̊ to the 300mm length would be the best fiber orientation, and laying the fibers parallel to the 300mm length would be the worst, and each orientation has some different material properties. The +/- 45̊ wrap is a good compromise. The wall thickness (increased), and lengths of the sides (decrease) influence the results greatly, and would reduce stresses and deflections. Maybe three layers would be better with the two outer layers wrapped 90̊ to the 300mm length and a middle layer wrapped at +/- 45̊. More generous corner radii will be an improvement too.