×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Secondary beams in ETABS

Secondary beams in ETABS

Secondary beams in ETABS

(OP)
Hi all
I am confused about secondary beams option in ETABS. As to my knowledge, secondary beams are those which rest on another beam (called primary beam). These beams have pinned supports unlike other beams which have continuous moment release.
My 1st question is what if i draw a "secondary beam (according to above definition)" like other beams as line object in ETABS. What difference does it make?? After all in actual structure who can say that this beam has pinned support or fixed.. These are all our idealization.. Isn't it??
My 2nd question is what type of beam is this which rests on column at one end and at beam at the other end.?? Should i also consider it as a secondary beam?
Thank you in advance for any help.

RE: Secondary beams in ETABS

Hi Blackstar123,

You're thinking way too much about this, IMHO. Secondary beam is just a term used by the program to help us draw the structure.

Thanks and best regards.

RE: Secondary beams in ETABS

(OP)
Thank you pkjr618 for the reply. I got your point but what about the support condition?? Beam drawn by these two commands have different end support condition. Could you give a practical example in which we would want the beam to have pin or fixed support?

RE: Secondary beams in ETABS

Typically, we'd like to assign a fixed end condition for beams that are part of the lateral load resisting system of our structures so that they will resist moments induced by lateral load such as wind and earthquake. On the other hand, we might want to assign a pinned end condition on beams which are not part of the lateral load resisting system. We do this because having every beam and girder as ductile members would prove to be expensive rather than having these secondary beams serve only one purpose as the gravity load resisting system of the structure.

Besides, you can always change the member end condition of the secondary beam utility if you want it fixed or pinned accordingly. Thanks to dadomago75 for helping me better understand the idea in the above paragraph.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources