×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Pressure Piping and the ongoing issue of welding downhand vs. uphand.

Pressure Piping and the ongoing issue of welding downhand vs. uphand.

Pressure Piping and the ongoing issue of welding downhand vs. uphand.

(OP)
I've run into the issue of downhand pipe welding (SMAW), using 7018, and the reasons why it's bad, and how some inspectors just don't care. I've usually chalked it up to the skill of the welder, and the circumstances of positions etc. Could someone please clarify for me if there are any code requirements to this anomaly? I've scoured SEC IX, B31.3 etc etc and I really couldn't find much. I know the difference between uphill/downhill and that the downhand thing is more or less a trade term, but I would really like to put this issue to bed. Thanks!

RE: Pressure Piping and the ongoing issue of welding downhand vs. uphand.

Put it to bed? Why? When you need speed and your welder can control the arc at that speed and you get the quality you want ... go for it. When you need higher quality, thicker throats and have all day to do it ... go uphill.

Production -> downhill, Speciality-> Uphill

Downhill Advantages
---------
Faster speed.
Smaller fillet legs.
Lower overall heat input due to faster speed.
Less distortion due to lower heat input.

Disadvantages
--------------
Harder to control arc track at faster speeds.
Possibility of greater number of slag inclusions.

Independent events are seldomly independent.

RE: Pressure Piping and the ongoing issue of welding downhand vs. uphand.

PS no code issues, other than qualifying the procedure, whatever that might be.

Independent events are seldomly independent.

RE: Pressure Piping and the ongoing issue of welding downhand vs. uphand.

Hello everybody:
Here you can find some ingredients to start a good discussion: thread794-187838: downhand vs uphill.

El que no puede andar, se sienta.

RE: Pressure Piping and the ongoing issue of welding downhand vs. uphand.

Whereas E7018 is classified under SFA 5.1 for V- up progression per Table 1 Note [1], The WPS and the welder must be qualified with vertical down progression to permit same in production.

Because welding with E7018 with downward progression will no doubt be done with smaller diameter electrodes at lower current settings than when used in upward progression, deposition rates will be lower even though travel speed will be higher. If you want to weld downhill with low hydrogen electrodes, use E7048.

RE: Pressure Piping and the ongoing issue of welding downhand vs. uphand.

(OP)
stanweld, that's exactly the answer I was looking for. Thank you for the info.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources