×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Head Loss through pipe system

Head Loss through pipe system

Head Loss through pipe system

(OP)
What would be the head loss through this pipe system?

A 3" pipe branches off into 5 - 3/4" pipes all the same length and diameter. 3/4" Pipes discharge to the air.

Just taking into consideration flow through the pipes, is the head loss through the system equal to:

1) (HL in 3" Pipe) + (HL in 1 of the 3/4" Pipes)

or

2) (HL in 3" Pipe) + (HL in all of the 3/4" Pipes)

I'm pretty sure it's 1), but its been a long time....

RE: Head Loss through pipe system

For Q1 = Q2, it would have to be #2, not #1, as you are talking about the head loss of the total piping system.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: Head Loss through pipe system

(OP)
Ok, perhaps I worded my question poorly. I'm trying to size a pump at the end of the 3" Pipe system above and I need to figure the Dynamic Head to develop a system curve.

I thought #1 was correct as the 3/4" pipes are in parallel and have the same HL across their length. The flow Q1 is divided into the 5 3/4" Pipes (Q1 = 5*Q2). So HL across the parallel system is equal to 1 of the 3/4" Pipes.

To develop this system curve, which is correct?

1) (HL in 3" Pipe) + (HL in 1 of the 3/4" Pipes)

or

2) (HL in 3" Pipe) + (HL in all of the 3/4" Pipes)

I appreciate your response and apologize if my question still is not clear.

RE: Head Loss through pipe system

closer to 1 than to 2
but neither is correct

to be accurate, there is additional headloss between each of the tee fittings such that the flow in the 5 3/4 inch pipes are not equal. there will be more flow in the first and less flow in each succeeding branch line.
in addition, I assume you mean friction loss only, not losses due to elevation change?

RE: Head Loss through pipe system

(OP)
Thanks.

Yes I understand loss at each fitting and elevation head. Just not sure if I was suppose to add up the HL in all the pipes or assume they are in parallel.

RE: Head Loss through pipe system

The answer is #2.

Look at it this way. Pushing the liquid through each 3/4" pipe is going to need pressure to keep the water moving through all 5 pipes. To have the pressure you need, you must overcome the resistance (or drag) for each pipe. So you need to have enough head to push the liquid through all 5 pipes.

If you only have enough pressure from the pump to get water through one 3/4" pipe, water would not flow through the other 4 pipes - no pressure.

This is a simplistic illustration. in reality, water would just trickle through each 5 pipes at a very slow velocity because the are all sharing the pressure you provide for that single pipe.

This is an easy problem because all 5 pipes are the same diameter. To prove your solution #1 is wrong, what would you do if all 5 pipes were different diameter?

RE: Head Loss through pipe system

The head at the outlet of all five branches are equal (atmospheric), the head at the upstream end of all five branches are also equal because they are all joined to the same 3" pipe. This is the case no matter the size of the branches, or even their lengths, or presence of bends and vales, even if one is a foot diameter and a mile long, and another a quarter inch diameter and a foot long. For a given applied driving head, size and length only determines flow distribution (head loss is always equal).

I think Ben Johnsons statement: “…you need enough head to push the liquid through all 5 pipes.” Would be more accurately stated, as “you need enough hydraulic horse power to push the liquid through all 5 pipes,” where hydraulic horse power is the ability for a pump to supply a greater flow rate at a given head.

If increasing pump power can be added to the system with additional branches being added, where the flow rate through each additional branch will remain the same, with the same driving head, then the total head loss through the system will also remain the same even after adding a hundred more branches.

The answer is number 1 without exception for bends, valves and other minor losses (though these things will cause flow in each pipe to not be equal and thus should be considered). It is hydraulic horse power that increase with added branches, not head loss.

RE: Head Loss through pipe system

The answer is #1 although I don't think that is what you are looking for.

If you want to guarantee equal flow through all five 3/4" pipes, you need to install some type of pressure device at the end of the 3/4" pipes so that the fluid resistance in the piping is inconsequential.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources