×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ETABS- regarding Analysis Processing time

ETABS- regarding Analysis Processing time

ETABS- regarding Analysis Processing time

(OP)
Dear All,

I am analysing a 28 story concrete building on ETABS v 9.7.4. Building model has shell elements (slab with rigid diaphragm and shear walls) and frame elements (beams and columns). Following are the details from LOG file.

E L E M E N T F O R M A T I O N 19:34:06

NUMBER OF JOINT ELEMENTS FORMED = 41000
NUMBER OF SPRING ELEMENTS FORMED = 0
NUMBER OF FRAME ELEMENTS FORMED = 282898
NUMBER OF SHELL ELEMENTS FORMED = 86605
NUMBER OF LINK ELEMENTS FORMED = 557
NUMBER OF NONLINEAR DEFORMATION LOADS = 0
NUMBER OF CONSTRAINTS FORMED = 485

REDUCTION OF CONSTRAINTS AND RESTRAINTS:
NUMBER OF
CONSTRAINT MASTER DOF BEFORE REDUCTION = 1473
COUPLED CONSTRAINT/RESTRAINT MASTER DOF = 380
CONSTRAINT MASTER DOF AFTER REDUCTION = 1093

E Q U A T I O N S O L U T I O N 20:06:55

TOTAL NUMBER OF EQUILIBRIUM EQUATIONS = 462033
APPROXIMATE "EFFECTIVE" BAND WIDTH = -4328

NUMBER OF EQUATION STORAGE BLOCKS = 273
MAXIMUM BLOCK SIZE (8-BYTE TERMS) = 8388608
SIZE OF STIFFNESS FILE(S) (BYTES) = 1.079 GB

NUMBER OF EQUATIONS TO SOLVE = 462033
NUMBER OF STATIC LOAD CASES = 13
NUMBER OF ACCELERATION LOADS = 6
NUMBER OF NONLINEAR DEFORMATION LOADS = 0

To analyse this building my computer is taking 14 hours. I think this is too large.

My computer OS is Windows 7.0 with 8GB physical RAM and Intel Core i7 CPU (3.4 GHz).

Please suggest based on your experience if this type of run-time is justifiable. if not, what could be possible reasons for such slow processing.

Thanks for your time and efforts.

RE: ETABS- regarding Analysis Processing time

Yes the solution time is too large. Did you check the generated mesh of the sheel elements?
After the solution, do the results appear proper?
The negative value of the effective bandwidth is a little weird...

Analysis and Design of arbitrary cross sections
Reinforcement design to all major codes
Moment Curvature analysis

http://www.engissol.com/cross-section-analysis-des...

RE: ETABS- regarding Analysis Processing time

(OP)
Hi John,

thanks for quick response. I have used Auto mesh for walls and slab with 1.8m maximum mesh size.

Please let me know the reason for negative bandwidth. what does this term mean and where should I look for possible errors in model.

Results appear to be fine.

Thanks

RE: ETABS- regarding Analysis Processing time

1.8m (5.9ft) mesh seems awfully small for a whole building. I'm guessing you can go with a much rougher mesh and get similar results.

I typically don't ever let ETABS automesh walls unless out of plane loading is a concern. I'll try to limit horizontal mesh spacing of wall elements so that width:height is less than 1:1. Usually will do one or two elements per story. May need more if there are openings in the wall.

Generally speaking, where a real refined mesh will really help you is for out-of-plane design of slender elements (slabs, out-of-plane walls). A fine mesh won't yield as much of an increase in accuracy for elements looking at in-plane forces (walls, diaphragms) because the changes in curvature aren't as dramatic and reversals aren't as common. You could look at maintaining the fine mesh (or even going finer) where you're anticipating elements to be at higher moments (like at the base of your tall walls for the 28 foot building) and less fine elsewhere (like at the top). A 1.8m by 1.8m mesh seems pretty coarse but when you consider your building is probably 80m+ tall, that means for a single shear wall you're looking at 40+ by whatever elements. Adds up quick.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources