Redundancy Airflow Ducting
Redundancy Airflow Ducting
(OP)
I have a scenario where the client wants 50% redundancy using 2 constant volume units. This means I have 2 units each sized for 75% of the TOTAL load. My question is what airflow do I use for sizing the duct? There will be a common duct and I will use a horizontal mounted back draft damper on the connections to the units. If I size it for the total redundant load airflow, 150%, I will be over-cooling the space??? If I size it for only 1 unit operating at once, what happens when the other unit kicks on?? My duct will be too small to ahndle the airflow.??? I guess I just need to know how these units will operate.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.





RE: Redundancy Airflow Ducting
lower value velocity is not so crucial for sanitary air applications.
RE: Redundancy Airflow Ducting
why not use some VAV setup? It sure also would be more comfortable f you have fluctuating loads. Your scenario gives you a 2-stage cooling and if you have over 75% load, it will cycle the 2nd unit on/off with over/undershooting the temp. The same will happen under 75% load.
depending on your actual failure scenario and needs you also could use one airhandler with 2 fans, and a DX system with 2 independent refrigerant circuits. If it is all variable speed (fan and compressor), you get big savings and still have pretty good redundancy and save on duct size.
Maybe tell us more about the application and we can come up with better ideas. How the load is over time will be important in decision-making.
RE: Redundancy Airflow Ducting
RE: Redundancy Airflow Ducting
If one unit fails the equipment overheats since you have only 75% of the required capacity.
RE: Redundancy Airflow Ducting
Btw, if one system goes down and one is satisfying 75% of the load, wouldn't the system only lose it's ability to cool down to the required setpoint (75F)? Instead, woulnd't it only cool down to let's say 80F ???
Thanks
RE: Redundancy Airflow Ducting
Heat out = heat in --> constant temperature
Heat out < heat in --> constantly increasing temperature
Depending on things that you haven't told us about the conditioned space the equipment may or may not be the only source of "heat in" and the cooling system may or may not be the only source of "heat out".
RE: Redundancy Airflow Ducting
RE: Redundancy Airflow Ducting
TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers
RE: Redundancy Airflow Ducting
RE: Redundancy Airflow Ducting
The client likely doesn't know what he actually needs. Redundancy could mean the 2 systems with independent generators with independent fuel sources...
Regarding load you should find out what permanent and what temporary operating temperature those units require. I haven't come across VFD that need cooling that couldn't be met by just ventilating with OA.
If you really need refrigerated cooling, you should know what temperature is needed for permanent operation (this may be 80°F), and what the VFD can stand short term (this could be 120°F). you also need to gage how quickly a broken unit can be fixed and how long an outage of one would be the case.
for the cooling equipment you need the temperatures. Because your 10-ton equipment has 10 tons capacity as specific temperatures. If it is warmer inside, the capacity increases, so that way the temperature will stabilize at a higher temp if one unit fails.
If you end up actually needing the 100%, SAK9 advice to use 2x100% or 3x50% may be the best.
The load likely varies. first your VFD has different loads (whatever it is controlling) so it dissipates different heat amounts. Second, the heat that goes to surrounding spaces also varies as those spaces change. third, you won't be able to find a system that actually provides 100.00000% of your load. All fans, DX systems come in specific nominal sizes that unlikely are exactly the size you need.
RE: Redundancy Airflow Ducting
RE: Redundancy Airflow Ducting
TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers
RE: Redundancy Airflow Ducting
RE: Redundancy Airflow Ducting
To sum up the above, here's what I would do.
Question to client:
"You have asked for 50 percent redundancy. There are different ways to interpret that and I need an interpretation so that I give you what you want. Best would be if you could describe what you have done before in other facilities.
Or, I'll give you some examples from which to choose:
1) You need reliability to always meet your load. Say that load is 100 tons. 50 percent of that is 50 tons. The reliability solution would be 3 each 50-ton units, so that you can meet the 100 ton load with one unit out of service. We call this N+1, you have one unit considered as spare or standby that can be brought online to restore full capacity in the event of failure or maintenance downtime on one of the other units.
2) You need room for expected growth in your load but you don't want to pay for an idle unit for standby. For the 100 ton case, that means that you expect to have more cooling load added in the future, like an addition to your building or a whole bunch more computers than you have now. We call this spare capacity. In this case, two 75-ton units or a single 150-ton unit will give you the 50 unused percent you need for load growth.
3) You need your 100 ton load satisfied in normal operation, but you would be happy with reduced capacity during maintenance or failure of one unit. Your 50 percent redundancy might mean two 75-ton units = 150 tons. When one unit fails, you can meet 75 percent of the load and cover it by unplugging all of your coffee makers, snack machines, and microwave ovens. We call this 'kind of silly."
I really need you to clarify for me. Are you looking for one of those three solutions, or something different?"
Best to you,
Goober Dave
Haven't see the forum policies? Do so now: Forum Policies
RE: Redundancy Airflow Ducting
Thanks again!