×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Rigid Body Motion in Deformable Cube

Rigid Body Motion in Deformable Cube

Rigid Body Motion in Deformable Cube

(OP)
Hi,

I am modelling uniaxial loading on a unit cube. I have applied concentrated loads on the vertices to do this. My mesh size is the same as that of the cube, which makes it a single-element model.

However, when I view the displacement results, rigid-boy motion has occurred. I cannot apply a translational BC on the nodes because I want them to be free to move. How do I preven rigid body motion then?

Thank you.

RE: Rigid Body Motion in Deformable Cube

Hi RShah7,

I am not sure if I understand your question but I think that your problem is that you are not modelling correctly. For a uniaxial test I think the easiest and most adequate method is to take a quarter of a model and impose symmetric boundary conditions. See the attached drawing (sorry i have only paint...) and let me know if you keep having problems. But I think that you are imposing force or displacements on the for nodes of the probe and that should not work.

RE: Rigid Body Motion in Deformable Cube

Pay close attention to the physics (mechanics, in a structural problem as the one in this thread) of the problem; it has nothing to do with ABAQUS or FEA.

You need to constrain sufficient number of rigid body modes in a given problem. For example, in the image uploaded by eng23bio, there are 3 rigid body modes possible in a 2D coordinate system. However, under the applied displacement boundary condition, pinning nodes in the y direction constrains the rigid body mode, which from a numerical analysis point of view, results in a numerical singularity. [The other boundary condition in the x-direction, as pointed out by eng23bio, is to enforce symmetry]. By the way, and this comes across too many times, there is no need to constrain rotational d.o.f. anywhere in this problem because the applied displacement boundary condition will not cause any rotation. [In cases where the b.c. may cause rotation, you need to be aware of the element type. Depending on the type of element, nodes may or may not have rotational d.o.f. For example, nodes on a 2D/3D continuum/brick element do not have rotational d.o.f.]

Are you new to this forum? If so, please read these FAQ's:

http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=376
http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=1083

RE: Rigid Body Motion in Deformable Cube

(OP)
Thanks a lot for your help! I will try out what eng23bio suggested.
About what IceBreakerSours said about rigid body rotation- my problem is that when I apply loads at the nodes, like I said I had done in the previous problem, rigid body rotation does occur. Even though the diplacements I have enforced don't cause the rigid body rotation (they shouldn't be causing rigid body motion either, because they are equal and opposite), it occurs because the equation [K]*{u} = {P} has more than one solution, and all the others include some sort of rigid body motion/rotation. What I was wondering was why Abaqus didn't converge to the solution it would physically converge to. I guess that is because for a static problem it just numerically solves the problem, in which case I can see why eng23bio's suggestion would work by explicitly telling it that there is symmetry in the problem.
Thanks!

RE: Rigid Body Motion in Deformable Cube

What physical phenomenon are you trying to model? Ku=f has more than one solution in, for example, buckling. If that or some similar physics is of interest, then you need a different solver (using an arc tracing method). Search for buckling in the Analysis User's Manual and look for content related to solvers.

Are you new to this forum? If so, please read these FAQ:

http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=376
http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=1083

RE: Rigid Body Motion in Deformable Cube

(OP)
No, this is simple uniaxial loading. What I mean when I say that there are an infinite number of solutions for {F} = [k]*{u} is that these are just equations of equilibrium, and do nothing to prevent rigid body motion, simply because only the differences in the u's are important- basically the final shape of the cube is important. I could take that deformed cube, and put it anywhere is space, and it would still satisfy the equation. Physically this shouldn't happen, since for a cube with balanced forces acting on it, the com should not move.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources