×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Means Egress Question for Existing S-1

Means Egress Question for Existing S-1

Means Egress Question for Existing S-1

(OP)
To the MOE experts out there; I am working on a project where a large warehouse is going to have the existing sprinklers removed, and ESFR and a pump will be added to accomodate a new tenant. There is an existing, rated exit tunnel that runs from the center of the warehouse, to an exit door on the exterior. I believe it was originally installed to meet the max 250 ft travel distanace per the original code the building was constructed to, because without this tunnel, some interior portions of the warehouse have a 275 ft travel distance to an exterior exit.

The new tenant would like to remove this tunnel, because it will interfere with their operations. If I apply the 2010 CBC and CFC, I am coming up with a 400 ft max travel distance allowed. This is based mainly on the criteria of 1016.3 of the Cal Bldg Code being met, which is below.

1016.3 Group F-1 and S-1 increase. The maximum exit access travel distance shall be 400 feet (122 m) in Group F-1 or S-1 occupancies where all of the following met:
1. The portion of the building classified as Group F-1 or S-1 is limited to one story in height,
2. The minimum height from the finished floor to the bottom of the ceiling or roof slab or deck is 24 feet (7315 mm), and
3. The building is equipped throughout with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1.

So my question, is there any reason we would be prohibited from doing this?

IE, if the bldg is being renovated, and the MOE will satisfy the fire and bldg code criteria of the currently adopted standards by the AHJ, I belive this it is allowable to propose to the AHJ that the exit tunnel be removed.

RE: Means Egress Question for Existing S-1

Should be allowed

But does the state fire marshal require smoke vents when esfr heads are used and 400 ft travel???

RE: Means Egress Question for Existing S-1

Thought I had cfc bookmarked

Check around 910.2

RE: Means Egress Question for Existing S-1

SECTION 910 SMOKE AND HEAT VENTS

910.1 General. Where required by this code or otherwise installed, smoke and heat vents or mechanical smoke exhaust systems and draft curtains shall conform to the requirements of this section.

Exceptions:

1. Frozen food warehouses used solely for storage of Class I and II commodities where protected by an approved automatic sprinkler system.
2. Automatic smoke and heat vents or mechanical smoke exhaust systems are not required within areas of buildings equipped with early suppression fast-response (ESFR) sprinklers unless any of the following conditions exist:
2.1. The building is a state institution,
2.2. The building is a state-owned or state-occupied building,
2.3. The building is any of the applications listed in Section 1.11 regulated by the Office of the State Fire Marshal, or
2.4. The area of a Group F-1 or S-1 occupancy protected with the early suppression fast- response (ESFR) sprinklers has an exit access travel distance of more than 250 feet (76 200 mm).

RE: Means Egress Question for Existing S-1

(OP)
Yes, this particular AHJ does require smoke vents with ESFR (fire testing has proven this not to be the case, but that is another post for another day). Smoke venting is to be provided for this project, 2 ratings higher than the link temp of the sprinklers, per this AHJ. This is another reason why I believe the 400 ft travel distance can be applied. It seems fairly clear to me, but removing an exit tunnel is a big deal. I want to be sure I am not missing anything, hence my post.

RE: Means Egress Question for Existing S-1

Does not sound like it

Can you set down with the ahj and show them a proposal to see if it flys?

RE: Means Egress Question for Existing S-1

This is obviously a CA amendment because this provision was removed from the model 2009 IBC. Based on the conditions described, I would permit the demolition of the exit tunnel.

RE: Means Egress Question for Existing S-1

(OP)
Stookeyfpe, thanks for the clarification. I was looking through the 09 IBC, and was wondering about that.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources