×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Seismic detailing of existing buildings

Seismic detailing of existing buildings

Seismic detailing of existing buildings

(OP)
Our firm has been awarded a new hospital addition in a high seismic area. Governing code is IBC 2009. Site Class is D, spectral accelerations are high, so the SDC is D and by a mile. The structural narrative of the RFP lays this out and I have verified. However, the structural narrative of the RFP indicates use of R=3 steel moment frames per provisions of the International Existing Building Code. I am not aware of such provisions and have been unable to find them in my research. So:

1) Where are these provisions?
2) What are the ethics involved here? In such a high-risk area, should I even consider R=3 if the IEBC does indeed allow it? (The existing building is old and probably is detailed equivalent to R<3. The addition will be independent.)

Thanks in advance for your help.

RE: Seismic detailing of existing buildings

If you are keeping the addition separate, and no structural work is being done in the original structure, it does not have to be upgraded.

However, after talking with your superiors, if they agree, it would be prudent to write a letter to the hospital administrators informing them of your concern.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: Seismic detailing of existing buildings

(OP)
Thanks Mike. Sorry about the confusion, but my question is related to the SLRS of the new, independent addition. Not the existing structure. The existing structure won't be touched, that is fairly clear. But the addition - I just can't see how it can be an R=3 system.

RE: Seismic detailing of existing buildings

I guess I am not quite sure what the question is. Are you retrofitting the existing structure? Is your concern for seismic separation?

RE: Seismic detailing of existing buildings

(OP)
The existing building is load-bearing CMU with steel joists, built decades ago. The addition is adjacent to existing, but independent (horizontal addition, not vertical). The existing building, its required upgrade, etc. is NOT the question.

The question is related to the NEW construction (the addition which is not attached to existing). The structural narrative indicated R=3 system was possible per provisions of the IEBC. Everything I am reading says that the new work must conform to the current building code, which would be IBC 2009, which would require R>3.

My question is: where in the IEBC does it allow for an independent addition to be R=3, even though the SDC is D?

RE: Seismic detailing of existing buildings

The addition needs to be designed per the current building code (IBC), not the existing building code (IEBC). Perhaps you should simply call the engineer that put the narrative together to discuss this provision.

A system were R=3 most likely will not result in a very economical design. In addition, I am not even sure what system would qualify for use in this scenario.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources