×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Balcony Loads - IBC 2012 vs. ASCE 7-10

Balcony Loads - IBC 2012 vs. ASCE 7-10

Balcony Loads - IBC 2012 vs. ASCE 7-10

(OP)
IBC 2012 states "Balconies and Decks - Same as occupancy served". e.g. 40 psf for an apartment balcony

ASCE 7-10 states "1.5 times the live load for the occupancy served. Not required to exceed 100 psf" e.g. 60 psf for an apartment balcony

Has anyone come across this before? Which one should govern? Conservatively, I could use the heavier load but this seems excessive. I am surprised that there is a conflict.

RE: Balcony Loads - IBC 2012 vs. ASCE 7-10

Hmm... ASCE 7-05 has 100 PSF live load for balconies except 60 PSF for 1-2 family residences < 100 ft^2. It looks like they scaled it back for 2010. IBC is the law, but personally I would go with the ASCE recommendations. Balconies are a critical design item best served with a bit of caution.

RE: Balcony Loads - IBC 2012 vs. ASCE 7-10

(OP)
Right. It used to be 60 psf for balconies in 1 and 2 family residences (cantilevered balconies, not supported on 2+ sides - a deck). IBC 2009 (iirc) revised balconies to "same as occupancy served" and now I see ASCE 7 is essentially going back to 60.

I don't mind beefing up a balcony design, but I am surprised at the error between the two.

RE: Balcony Loads - IBC 2012 vs. ASCE 7-10

It is probably not an "error" so much as a difference of opinion. Some things are different between the IBC and ASCE7, most notably some of the R, Cd values for seismic FRS (at least it used to be that way). I wish IBC would just adopt ASCE7 by reference for all structural engineering matters. Maybe it will go that way for the next code cycle.

RE: Balcony Loads - IBC 2012 vs. ASCE 7-10

This is strange, but I don't see any reason to ignore the reasoning behind the choice of 1.5 * Occupancy:

"Balconies and decks are recognized as often
having distinctly different loading patterns than most
interior rooms. They are often subjected to concentrated
line loads from people congregating along the
edge of the structure (e.g., for viewing vantage
points). This loading condition is acknowledged in
Table 4-1 as an increase of the live load for the area
served, up to the point of satisfying the loading
requirement for most assembly occupancies."

Anyone happen to know of the IBC Commentary mentions balcony loading at all?

Brian C Potter, PE
http://simplesupports.wordpress.com

RE: Balcony Loads - IBC 2012 vs. ASCE 7-10

I have always agreed with a higher load for balconies due to the tendency for psople to congregate there when partying or relaxing.

I was shocked to hear af few years ago that the code was changed to 40 psf for balconies. Now I know why some use that lower value.

Perhaps someone should bring this up to the IBC / ASCE7 committees...

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: Balcony Loads - IBC 2012 vs. ASCE 7-10

Whenever I come across a code discrepancy like this i always go with the conservative one. Also, I try to cross reference with real life and I would clearly see people jammed the coming summer in a balcony drinking, eating hotdogs and even kegs full of beer on such balcony. 40 psf is clearly unacceptable.

RE: Balcony Loads - IBC 2012 vs. ASCE 7-10

Balconies always get special attention from me, and especially the handrails, for precisely the reasons stated above. For awhile there, it seemed like every year or so the news carried a story of a balcony coming down with people craning there necks to see a parade, a sunset, an ambulance.... The heavier load does not seem excessive to me either. But I thank you for pointing out this unobserved discrepancy.

RE: Balcony Loads - IBC 2012 vs. ASCE 7-10

In colder parts of the country/world firewood gets stacked on decks and balconies as well. I will use 40psf on a deck in some instances just because of the redundancy, but never on a balcony

RE: Balcony Loads - IBC 2012 vs. ASCE 7-10

(OP)
This is what I got from the ICC

"Chapter 16 of the 2012 IBC does not reference the ASCE 7 -10 live load table for determination of minimum live loads. Therefore, IBC Table 1607.1 always governs for live loads."

RE: Balcony Loads - IBC 2012 vs. ASCE 7-10

Bear in mind that collapse does not (and frankly speaking usually does not) involve a problem with the code or application of the code.

It's the install.

And from what I've seen, engineering of such is usually never applied, let alone deficient. It simply was never done.

--Brian.

RE: Balcony Loads - IBC 2012 vs. ASCE 7-10

In my opinion, decks, with their support system producing less rotation at the building face as opposed to balconies, with proper flashing and sealing, the chance of structural degredation of the framing members from water intrusion at the building interface is less. For that reason alone, outside of the possibility of a reasonably higher occupant loading, I would use the 60 psf value, if not more, to limit the rotation at the interface. The price difference between a 2X6 and 2X8 or 10 is not that much...

I assume that ALL sealed balconies are adequately vented too - every joist space front and rear. They just have to be.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources