×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?
6

how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

(OP)
I need to cool a 200 mm square aluminum plate, 10 mm thick to 25 deg C. Test duration is 24 hours. This plate is getting constant radiation heat from underneath, about 20W. What I plan to do is to fabricate a cold plate and place it on the subject plate. The cold plate will have copper tubing embedded on the surface, and water will flow through the copper. I will flip it over and place it on the subject plate. Now the subject plate will directly contact copper tubing with water flowing inside.

Is there an easy way to improve metal to metal contact?
Thanks.

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

thermal compound/pads are used to improve metal/metal contact by filling in the inclusions/scratches,etc..

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

Thermally conductive compound. It's kinda like grease but usually filled with aluminum. Fills in all the small gaps that will surely be there. It's the gooey stuff you'll find down in thermowells and on top of modern CPUs in personal computers and laptops.

Best to you,

Goober Dave

Haven't see the forum policies? Do so now: Forum Policies

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

Well, mcgyvr typed faster than I did, so here's another hint:

Put the following phrase in Google -

Thermally conductive compound

The whole first page of hits seems to be manufacturers like Dow Corning. You could find data sheets and instructions that will give you the specs and best performance.

Best to you,

Goober Dave

Haven't see the forum policies? Do so now: Forum Policies

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

How thick is the plate with copper and what material? How much does the copper tubing protrude on the surface?

And out of curiousity what is the abiant air temperature? And is the hot plate losing heat from the underside also through convestion?

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

You might want to look at mechanically lapping the interfaces, which would increase the contact area. Thermal compounds are not that terribly thermally conductive, so a clean contact area and some amount of compression would probably do better and not have thermal compound getting smeared on everything.

TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

This could be just me not being too familiar with cold plates. But I don't think cold plates are meant to have such an imperfect face put against the object surface we want to cool. Sure, thermal compound will help. But I would ask that you also try to flip the cold plate and try it that way also. There's reasons to think it could work better. It's at least worth a try since it is very easy for you to do so. The heat taken away by the fluid is mostly through conduction since air conductivity is very low. What you get is a lower interface resistance with the adjacent plate.

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

Oh, I missed that; tubing against the aluminum plate is a bad idea. The point of having the copper plate is to efficient collect the heat from the aluminum plate and divert it into the tubes. Having only the tubes in contact means that the heat must travel through the aluminum instead, and then only have an extremely tiny contact area with the tubes. I can't even imagine why anyone would have picked that option as their first choice.

TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

(OP)
While copying and pasting, I must have deleted a line. The plates sit inside a vacuum chamber. I cannot use anything that will outgas heavily.

I am now convinced direct metal contact is a bad idea (for heat conduction). I am not sure if I can lap 200 mm square, both plates. What about something like soldering wick between the plates? (if they make a mat out of fine metal wires)

I still have the option of thermoelectric cooling.

Thank you for your replies and my apology for not including "vacuum" in the description.

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

(OP)
I forgot to answer how thick the cold plate is. The plate is there to hold the copper tubings flat. That's the only purpose. It can be of any thickness. Basically, nothing's above the subject plate that I need to cool 25 deg C.

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

"I am now convinced direct metal contact is a bad idea (for heat conduction). "

No, it's not. It's only bad if the design is bad. All that's required is a sufficiently intimate contact. 200mm^2 is less than 2" square, so how big are these tubes and what's their separation? That's what will determine the thickness require for the copper plate. If you're going to use solder wick, you might as well just go with direct contact. With a sufficiently cold coolant and sufficient flow, 20W is not that big a deal, necessarily.

TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

Not that this comment will help a lot, but the processor in my PC dissipates 250W pretty regularly, and it's only 52 mm x 45 mm. That's only about 1/16th the surface area of your warm plate. The motherboard maker's metal-to-package contact is pretty good, but they liberally apply conductive goop too. The coolant pipes are heat pipes. They are completely embedded in a hunk of aluminum. The other end of the heat pipes is a radiator with a fan. Your radiator, of course, has to be outside the vacuum chamber.

The processor gets hot -- 67°C at case surface, 91°C at the internal junctions. 25°C is more of a challenge, but with only 20W I think it can be met.

If you could cast aluminum around your heat exchanger tubes (completely surrounding them) and machine the contact surface nice and flat for good contact with the plate you need to cool, you might get the efficiency you need without too much trouble or any goop at all.

Best to you,

Goober Dave

Haven't see the forum policies? Do so now: Forum Policies

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

(OP)
It's good to hear that it might work. I will give it a try.
1) as you suggested, I will make the mating surfaces as flat as practical.
2) Btw, I meant 200 mm x 200 mm, not 200 sq mm.
3) Yes, I will have a cold water bath sitting outside the vacuum chamber. It will pump cold water through the copper tubing.
4) The reason I don't want to fix copper tubes directly on the warm plate is I need to take it out of the vacuum chamber. The cold plate can be swung up slightly, just enough to make room for the warm plate.
5) My plan: 10 mm dia copper tubes, embedded 50% depth into the cold plate, 50 mm apart,

Any further comments would be appreciated. Thanks,

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

I did some checks on some scenerios (difference from top to bottom plate temperature for 20watts heat generation and also minimum flow rate of zero degree C water required to remove that heat). By the numbers I am getting, I think you will succeed even if you screw this up really bad.

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

My data shows that for an rms surface finish of 50 micro inches flat plate the conductance invacua at a pressure of 2 psi is about
100W/m^2-c
If the cooling area is 200mm*200mm
then for 0 deg C water, I get
100*25*.200*.200= 100 watts of cooling
so the contact solution is plausible, even with less stringent surface finish.

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

(OP)
Thank you all for checking numbers for me. I will go ahead and fabricate the cold plate. 20 mm thick aluminum, 5 parallel grooves, 10 mm dia copper tubings brazed in the grooves, the other side polished better than 50 micro inch (like 400 grit) for good contact. Thank you again. Will report back but it will be a while.

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

(OP)
Thanks for the conduction number at 2 psi. What about vacuum like 10-5 torr (10-5 mbar, 10-3 pa)? Does it go down by a factor of 2 or 3? Or an order of magnitude?

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

(OP)
Thank you for answering all my questions. I am not ready to proceed.

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

What's better. A 20mm cold plate or 10mm? I vote for 10mm.

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

Hello IRstuff. What calculator is that?

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

Maybe that can help with the spacing of the tubing But I still think 10mm thickness is better than 20. More material is more resistance.

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

For the direct path, yes, but for the points directly in the middle, that might not be incorrect. Just imagine that the copper was paper-thin. The thermal resistance from the middle would be infinitely larger, and the heat would have to flow laterally in the aluminum to get to the coolant tubes. Therefore, there is an optimum thickness that balances the reduction in spreading resistance with the increase in the direct resistance. In either case, this particular example's low power makes it a bit moot. The thermal resistance is very low in any case, and if the calculator is correct, even a 1-mm copper thickness would be adequate.

The link I gave is not right; it should be http://www.mhtl.uwaterloo.ca/old/onlinetools/strip...

TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

I understand your explanation. My resoning is that we already have 10mm of aluminum, which is heated from the underside. Therefore the temperature distribution is already adjusted somewhat on the top surface. Is 10mm enough? I'm not sure but I have a feeling that it is. I'm interested to find out and I may try to solve it on the weekend.

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

knowlittle,

Please don't forget to let us know how it finally works out for you!

Best to you,

Goober Dave

Haven't see the forum policies? Do so now: Forum Policies

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

Let's assume he had lots more money, or a LOT more heat to get rid of from his plate-attached-to-a-vacuum chamber-that-needs-cooling.

If he machined his tube holes "inside of" the Al plate so that there were water flow paths inside of a thick AL or Cu plate, rather than on top of the thin plate and only touching at the tangents , then wouldn't he get the best heat transfer rate.

Noe, he'd need a head at each end of the thick heat exchanger plate, and those two head - like any heat exchanger would need to be screwed onto the sides of the thick plate, so he'd have more machining and assembly cost.....

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

Racook, I don't understand what you mean. I don't want to seem mean or anything..... I just don't get it. I'd like further explanation of your point.

Thanks.

RE: how effective is direct metal-to-metal contact for heat conduction?

If he machined his tube holes "inside of" the Al plate so that there were water flow paths inside of a thick AL or Cu plate, rather than on top of the thin plate and only touching at the tangents , then wouldn't he get the best heat transfer rate.


Not necessarily. I had assumed that the tubes were brazed to the copper plate, so there's a plausibly solid thermal path from the plate to the coolant.

TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources