×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Beam design in RAPT

Beam design in RAPT

Beam design in RAPT

(OP)
I have a 2-span continuous slab supported by walls on each side and a beam in the middle. The distance between the walls is 12m.
For the beam design: do I use a slab panel width of 6m, or should I increase the panel width by 25% to 7.5m? Because I realised that the middle reaction for a 2-span continuous slab is 25% higher than that of a simply supported slab due to moment redistribution.

RE: Beam design in RAPT

That is not moment redistribution, but is just the reaction at the centre support of two continuous spans. You should design the beam for the loading which it will see, which is 5/8 of the total length, so 7.5 metres tributary area.

RE: Beam design in RAPT

(OP)
Thanks hokie. What about for a continuous slab with multiple spans of different lengths supported by beams (where there's no general rule of 5/8 etc)...
For the beam design: would you first model the continuous slab itself with transverse beams at the supports, obtain the reactions at each support (but first take out the transverse beams so as not to double-count the self weight), and then apply the reactions as a line load to each beam?

RE: Beam design in RAPT

If it were 3 walls I would stay yes because the support in the middle will attract more load. 2 walls and a beam I would design with 6m panel because as the beam deflects downwards load will go back to the walls at either end.

RE: Beam design in RAPT

structuralex,
Yes, run the slab first, and use the results to design the beam.

RE: Beam design in RAPT

structuralex,

Yes, the best option is to do the slab design first. This will confirm the slab depths etc so you get the correct loading on the beam. You could allow for support settlement in this as asixth suggested. That would depend on the expected deflection of the beam.

Then you could determine what width of slab each beam supports and allow RAPT to calculate loads based on this, or over-ride the program calculated self-weights in the general screen, and then define your own line loads for each load case.

RE: Beam design in RAPT

(OP)
Cheers

RE: Beam design in RAPT

(OP)
rapt: at some point along the beam there is a vertical stepdown, but only half the horizontal steps down. In other words the cross-section goes from a rectangle to an "L" shape. Is there any way to model this in RAPT? If not, how would you recommend analysing it? Cheers

RE: Beam design in RAPT

structuralex,

You can use Trapezoidal Elements to model it. Void to remove the upper part of the slab to create the set down in the top over the width affected and solid to add the lower part below the slab.

For specific help on using RAPT, it would be better if you email me directly. I check email every day. I do not necessarily check eng-tips every day, especially when I am out of Australia as I am now!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources