INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Stainless Bolting

Stainless Bolting

(OP)
Hi
I was wondering if anyone could give some advice on what is the best stainless bolting material for long term subsea use in a CP environment. Basically I am required to bolt to a M20 female threaded component made from 431S29 (UNS S43100). I was thinking of using the same material but was unsure of its performance subsea. If I was to use another grade of bolt the female thread would still be 431 and I am most likely stuck with this anyway. Any advice would be much appreciated.

Thank you.

RE: Stainless Bolting

It depends on things including temperature, depth (oxygen content), whether or not it may be exposed to sour production fluids or not, CP voltage, etc. On the least demanding end 316 can be used. Better than that are the super-austenitics (e.g. A286). If highest performance is needed you can move to nickel alloys. I would, however shy away from duplex and super duplex bolting, as these materials are notorious for having low impact resistance if not formed/heat treated properly. After all, if it's going subsea you would hate to scrimp on bolting only to have to pull the equipment back up to replace.

RE: Stainless Bolting

(OP)
So you are saying I may be ok screwing 316l bolts into the 431 if the environment isnt subject to other potential contaminents? The componet is part of a cable connection system in shallow water depths of about 30m at 30 degrees C, in free flowing seawater. I wouldnt really expect there to be many if any contaminents.

RE: Stainless Bolting

430 might not be the best choice, both from a hydrogen embrittlement and a galling point of view. Probably best to stick with an austenitic alloy and ensure a hardness differential of minimum 50 HRB, unless disassembly is not an issue.

Steve Jones
Materials & Corrosion Engineer

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/8/83b/b04

All answers are personal opinions only and are in no way connected with any employer.

RE: Stainless Bolting

Same goes for martensitic 431 rednose

Steve Jones
Materials & Corrosion Engineer

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/8/83b/b04

All answers are personal opinions only and are in no way connected with any employer.

RE: Stainless Bolting

ISO3506 A4-70 or 80.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close