×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

General Dimensioning Question

General Dimensioning Question

General Dimensioning Question

(OP)
You have a box, with three identical tabs welded to the top, extending up. These tabs are aligned in profile in the side view. When dimensioning them, do you dimension the profile using single dimensions, or do you add "3X" to the dimensions?
I had been taught that if it was obvious from the other views that there were aligned, you do not add "3X" as you were dimensioning the profile, not the individul tabs. I can't locate where or if this is addressed in ASME Y14.5.
TIA!

“Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively.”
-Dalai Lama XIV

RE: General Dimensioning Question

(OP)
There is only one tab outline visible in the side view, which indicates that they are aligned (so it is as shown, not assumed), and the other views show the additional tabs and their spacing.

“Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively.”
-Dalai Lama XIV

RE: General Dimensioning Question

(OP)
The same tolerance would apply. The dimensions define the profile, and as long as all of the tabs fall within the dimensional tolerances, it is good. It would not matter if one tab fell at the low end of the tolerance and the next at the high end.
One way around this would be to dimension and use extension lines in the other views that show the tabs, but I am checking a rather busy drawing and didn't want to make it busier.
See attached.

“Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively.”
-Dalai Lama XIV

RE: General Dimensioning Question


First, it’s 4X, not 3X.

Second, if it was not 4 tabs, but 4 holes aligned in the side view, would you be satisfied with Y14.5 Fig.7-44?

RE: General Dimensioning Question

ewh,

I can interpret your drawing as shown, but 4X makes everything absolutely clear.

--
JHG

RE: General Dimensioning Question

(OP)
CH,
Sorry about the "4X" vs "3X"; this was just a quick pic to describe the situation. That figure (and others in that section) does make it a bit clearer for me.

JHG,
I have to agree... the drawing should not contain any assumptions.

Thanks!

“Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively.”
-Dalai Lama XIV

RE: General Dimensioning Question

No need to be sorry, I didn’t mean to be harsh on you smile
I used to work on 2 CAD systems, one would make array of 4 features, another 1 feature and 3 “copies”.
It was constant “what? How many?”
Good thing we are on the same page. Using multiplier makes it clear and doesn’t take lot of drawing space.

RE: General Dimensioning Question

Quote (CheckerHater)


...
Second, if it was not 4 tabs, but 4 holes aligned in the side view, would you be satisfied with Y14.5 Fig.7-44?

In SolidWorks, when I am dimensioning hole patterns on my designs, I dimension to the furthest hole away. The dimension line crosses the other centre marks and holes. If, for some reason, I cannot do this, I dimension to the nearest hole and I apply the quantity of holes that line up.

Recently, I was making fabrication drawings of someone's rather sloppy models, so I used SolidWorks' linear centre marks, rather than their single ones. When this features draws the connecting lines, I assume that stuff lines up.

--
JHG

RE: General Dimensioning Question

The easy answer is clarity... if the only thing defining the location of the three tabs is a dimension in their profile view then place "3X" or similar with the dimension locating them. But if in the top view the tabs are aligned with a phantom line, or there is anything elsewhere (note, datum...) in the drawing indicating they share the same nominal position then 3X is optional.

I was taught that clarity overrides standards. Some drawings are so busy its hard to distinguish feature positions that are very close and sometimes a note (eg: "TO .350" TALL TABS, 3 PLACES") saves creating sheet 2 for only one more detail view you couldn't fit on a one page drawing...

lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources