×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

4 Run Balance Method

4 Run Balance Method

4 Run Balance Method

(OP)
Hi guys,

Have been performing the 4 run method for a while now. Works well enough with a vibration meter. The balance weight location works fantastic. However I find that the weight required according to the method is often incorrect (typically lower than required). What am I doing wrong?

Is there a way to improve on this?

thanks

Dynaman

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

(OP)
Hi Greg, the error is about about 60% lower than required. I'm not using software, just doing the vector math by hand.

cheers

M.

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

Try doing the 4-run method graphically with the intersection circles. Perhaps there is a math error rather than a physical error in weight size or placement.

Walt

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

Since you are doing it mathematically try adding noise (ie random phase, say 10% amplitude) to your measurements and seeing if that tends to pull the results in or out with your particular procedure.

Use one of the on line calculators to check your working, it is much easier to see what is going on graphically.

I agree 60% is a huge error.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

(OP)
I tried the method using intersecting circles. I can get the circles to intersect at a point really well. Its just that the weight is off.

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

Is this a rotor with the possibility of some bowing in response to the weight? like a center hung fan on relatively long shaft or some lengthy rotor operating at 50% of first bending critical or above?

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

(OP)
It is an overhung rotor, shaft length and diameter is considerable but don't believe it is bowing. I check the vibration results using frequency analysis and I'm measuring the imbalance signal (no hidden effects that I can see). I have tried the process on many different fans and gave the same results.

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

what instrument(s) do you have? Do you have a photocell, etc for sychronous measurements?

I'd do some "bump" test with the sensor radially on the shaft out by the fan wheel, impacting out by the wheel, and some impacting other locations.
The running 1st bending resonance is possibly ( I first wrote likely, then changed my mind) to be somewhat higher than a static test if the fan wheel back plate is stiff enuff to provides some gyroscopic stiffening.
Is the fan isolation mounted?
Do you take vibration measurements elsewhere on the fan, structure and foundation?

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

I'm surprised the angle comes out right and not the magnitude. The angle is the trickier part of that calculation.

Is the correction weight attached at same radius as the trial weights were?
Is it possible you have a weighing error for the trial weight or correction weight... that would give correct angle but wrong magnitude.

Sorry to suggest such simple things... just mentioned in the unlikely event you haven't looked at these already.

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

(OP)
Hi all. Thanks for your feedback. I went back to the lab (my garage)and tested Greg's hypothesis. I superimposed white noise over the imbalance signal using my oscilloscope software and ran the 4 point method again (graphically). The phase solution was the same however the correction weight was way worse now, in factor double the error. Hmmmm.... not sure why exactly but it had a dramatic effect. I then re-ran the solution again, this time applied filtering. The solution gave the same phase angle but now the correction weight was pretty close to the actual solution. So it seems that noise can really throw things out.

For those who asked, I'm using frequency analysis (FFT) to measure the peak amplitude at RPM. That way I can concentrate on the imbalance signal only. There were some other noise elements at higher frequencies but their magnitude was quite low relative to the imbalance. I also thought about coupling effects at RPM because its an overhung rotor........maybe.

So I think the 4 point method is fine its just how I measured the data.

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

I thought up some rules of thumb for the 4 plane method - waddayathink?

1) use a triggered method instead unless you love puzzles

If we call the 4 runs U, T1 T2 and T3, where T1 is the trial weight at position 0 degrees, T2 is at 120 degrees, T3 at 240 degrees:

2) one or two of the runs T1-3 needs to be less than U. if not, use a smaller trial mass

3) one or two of the runs T1-3 needs to be greater than U, if not then it is physically impossible (with 120 spacing) so you must have a noisy measurement. Use a bigger trial mass.

4) if any of the T runs is zero then that run is the solution

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

(OP)
What triggered method are you referring to Greg?

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

(OP)
How do you use a 2 channel FFT to calculate phase shift?

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

Two channel analyser can tell you relative phase of different points on the machine at a given time. I don't think it would be much use for balancing since the things we want to compare occur at different times. You need something some kind of pickup that is going to look at something on the rotating shaft and give you a once per revolution pulse can be used as reference for phase measurement.

Quote:

2) one or two of the runs T1-3 needs to be less than U. if not, use a smaller trial mass

3) one or two of the runs T1-3 needs to be greater than U, if not then it is physically impossible (with 120 spacing) so you must have a noisy measurement. Use a bigger trial mass.
What on earth are you talking about?

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

Quote:

Hi all. Thanks for your feedback. I went back to the lab (my garage)and tested Greg's hypothesis. I superimposed white noise over the imbalance signal using my oscilloscope software and ran the 4 point method again (graphically). The phase solution was the same however the correction weight was way worse now, in factor double the error. Hmmmm.... not sure why exactly but it had a dramatic effect. I then re-ran the solution again, this time applied filtering. The solution gave the same phase angle but now the correction weight was pretty close to the actual solution. So it seems that noise can really throw things out.
I'm not sure what he purpose was of adding noise. It was apparently to test a hypothesis which as I understood it was that random measurement error would affect the magnitude of calculated correction but not angle of the calculated correction. I see no reason for that to be the case (anyone want to explain). The result that was reported was that filtering the signal gave good results on magnitude and phase. What does filtering do: get rid of other frequency components. So now we know the likely cause is that you had other frequency components present which were increasing your overall magnitude. Filtering gave the running speed amplitude. Why the original error (From extra frequencies) affected only the magnitude and not the angle of calculated correction is still somewhat of a mystery to me.

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

Last comment - I want to clarify I was not trying to downplay Greg's contribution (sorry if it came accross that way). His general idea was that he suspected measurement error of some type and that's what it turned out to be (error due to extra frequencies present). My focus is trying to learn the lesson of why it acted the way it did (why did it affect only magnitude and not phase of calculated correction)

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

(OP)
Like I said, I couldn't explain it but it worked. The measurement for RPM peak amplitude was way more stable without noise present + filtering. So with noise the peak would shift erratically so you had to question where exactly was the amplitude peak. Sometimes it was high and sometimes lower so I got erratic results... but for some reason the phase angle didn't change (maybe +/-2 degree at most).

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

(OP)
Okey dokey, but how can I use it to measure phase shift? I'm missing something here.

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

So, if I understand correctly, you're saying we can do standard single plane 1-run balance using a 2-channel vibration analyser without any optical/laser sensor looking at the shaft?

I haven't heard of that and don't understand how it would work. Perhaps you or someone can explain how that would work?
I'd also be interested to understand what you meant by items 2 and 3 posted above?

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

For dynaman - do you have access to tunable strobe to freeze the shaft? If so, you can use that to determine phase for balancing.

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

(OP)
I can determine phase shift using a IR sensor on a dual trace scope BUT how can I used a 2 channel FFT to measure phase? Is there a better way to measure phase?

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

Quote (dynaman)

How do you use a 2 channel FFT to calculate phase shift?

Quote (electricpete)

Two channel analyser can tell you relative phase of different points on the machine at a given time. I don't think it would be much use for balancing since the things we want to compare occur at different times. You need something some kind of pickup that is going to look at something on the rotating shaft and give you a once per revolution pulse can be used as reference for phase measurement.

Quote (GregL)

ep - you are wrong. A 2 channel FFT analyser makes a great balancing analyser.

Quote (electricpete)

So, if I understand correctly, you're saying we can do standard single plane 1-run balance using a 2-channel vibration analyser without any optical/laser sensor looking at the shaft?

I haven't heard of that and don't understand how it would work. Perhaps you or someone can explain how that would work?

Quote (GregL)

No, of course you need a trigger see 5 Mar 13 19:01 and 5 Mar 13 16:51
OK then, maybe I'm just slow. Please explain the comment "you are wrong" in more detail.

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

(OP)
Doh!

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

ep - just try it. it works. I have very rarely had the luxury of using a dedicated balance machine, and have used a 2 channel FFT analyser to do it for 30 years. trigger goes into chan 1, vibration into chan 2, transfer function 2/1 gives you phase.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

(OP)
Ahh I see now.... geez thanks guys.

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

If you have a trigger looking at shaft, either 1 channel or 2 channel works for 1-trial run balance calc.
If you don't have a trigger looking at shaft, neither 1 channel nor 2 channel works for 1-trial run balance calc.

2 channel adds the ability to calculate phase as difference between two vibration channels, but that's not what you need for balancing. (You need phase from a triger looking at the shaft.)

dynaman asked "How do you use a 2 channel FFT to calculate phase shift?". My response tried to explain there is nothing special about 2 channel that gives ability to calculate phase for balancing (the phase we gain by 2 channel has nothing to do with balancing). Apparently that was misinterpreted along the lines of "balancing cannot be done with 2 channel analyser."

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

There may be a difference in types of equipment we're discussing. The single channel vibration analysers I have seen all have one analog vibration input plus a trigger input (for example TTL) and provide phase based on these inputs. That is the framework for my discussion. Greg is probably talking about vib analysers that don't have a separate trigger input, so 2-channel would be required to accommodate phase measurement using a trigger.

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

I have done balancing with a 2-channel (PC with external sound card)analyzer. Channel-1 was tachometer (1xSS) and channel-2 was vibration sensor (accelerometer). The phase was measured from the Transfer Function and vibration amplitude directly from the acceleration spectrum. In this case the "2-channel analyzer" did not have a separate Trigger input.

Walt

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

(OP)
Hi Walt,

Can you paste a link to the software you use to perform the transfer function? I would like to try this out.

thanks.

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

Here is one that I use on occasion:
DASYLab® Software
Need Pro version for Transfer Function
Pasted from <http://www.mccdaq.com/products/dasylab.htm>;
I have seen other programs advertised on Web. starting at about $100.00 that do TF analysis.

Walt

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

(OP)
wow its really pricy software. I like how you can develop your own apps. Wondering if there is cheaper software for development?

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

(OP)
thanx

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

If you are using the FFT to measure the peak amplitude, what kind of windowing are you using? Is it possible that the windowing is knocking your peak amplitude down such that the calculated correction weight is low.

Steve

RE: 4 Run Balance Method

(OP)
I checked out Octave looks quite complicated. I like DasyLab for its simple GUI (don't like the price though). I've seen SigView which looks great and cheap too.... but can't compile it to run as a stand alone.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources