Dissimilar Mesh Joining
Dissimilar Mesh Joining
(OP)
Hi pals.
I have to connect two solids meshed independently from each other, but that are connected in reality.
The nodes on the joined surface are not coincident, save for some lucky coincidence. Any of you can suggest which type of NASTRAN elements can be used to produce a realistic connection? RBE2? RBE3? MPC relations? I tried in the past with MPCs, but I got some odd behaviour both in statics and dynamics.
Thanks, bye.
Spirit
I have to connect two solids meshed independently from each other, but that are connected in reality.
The nodes on the joined surface are not coincident, save for some lucky coincidence. Any of you can suggest which type of NASTRAN elements can be used to produce a realistic connection? RBE2? RBE3? MPC relations? I tried in the past with MPCs, but I got some odd behaviour both in statics and dynamics.
Thanks, bye.
Spirit
'Ability is 10% inspiration and 90% perspiration.'





RE: Dissimilar Mesh Joining
If your software does not have a "Join Dissimilar Mesh" button to generate the RBE3s automatically, then one option is to do it by hand, which can be incredibly tedious and infeasible in most cases. Another option is to project the nodes of one surface to the interfacing surface, then hope the geometry-based mesher on the other surface will use the seeded nodes. If this fails, another option is to sacrifice geometry-based mesh and mesh the projected nodes on the other surface by hand, then either hope the tet mesher will use the seeded surface elements, or else extrude brick elements from them. Another option is to try to merge "coincident" nodes, but this requires well-planned manual or perhaps mapped mesh.
Maybe one of the best ways, though also tedious, is to seed the node locations on one surface by meticulously placing an Anchor node (if your software has this feature) on each node of the geometry-based mesh on your first surface, then test remesh it to see if the geometry-based mesher will remesh on exactly the same nodes. At any rate, once node locations are established, project their location to the other surface, place an Anchor node at each of those locations on the other surface, then auto mesh the other surface. If you cannot project to other model, the above node location coordinates can be communicated to owner of the other model manually. Obviously the smaller the model becomes, the more feasible this "communication" and Anchor node option becomes. Of course, another option is to join the two part models, then mesh the assembly after joining.
If there are other, better methods not mentioned above, hopefully someone will mention them. Good luck.
RE: Dissimilar Mesh Joining
I think you should use the same mesh density on both the parts on joining area. This will creates nodes almost at same location, if the dimensions of both interfacing surface same. If one part is smaller/different then other you should divide the suface on bigger part with smaller part surface.
After this you can very well merge the nodes and this will eliminate definition of other elements for connection purpose.
RE: Dissimilar Mesh Joining
Divide means you need to make partition of the surface. Or project the smaller part edge to the bigger part edge with same geometric profile.
RE: Dissimilar Mesh Joining