×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

blowdown on boilers vs. cooling towers

blowdown on boilers vs. cooling towers

blowdown on boilers vs. cooling towers

(OP)
Hi,
since starting my carreer with a water treatment company, I’ve always calculated boiler blowdown using the following formula:

BD = evap rate / (cycles -1)

This is an equation that I learned in cooling tower training but I’ve always used it for boilers too by replacing evap rate with steamrate. However, after a customer looked at me funny when I calculated their boiler blowdown I found the formula below, which gives you a different answer:

(1/cycles) * steamload = BD

Can you help me understand why there is a difference between the way cooling tower blowdown and boiler blowdown are calculated? I can't wrap my mind around why there would be a difference in the way cycles are calculated for the two since they both have makeup, blowdown, cycles, and steam. What am I missing here?


thanks.

RE: blowdown on boilers vs. cooling towers

Cooling tower loses a percentage of the liquid to evaporation and hence concentrates the cycle build up as a function of evaporation while boilers evaporate every unit of water that enters the boiler one pound in, one pound out. When it evaporates, it leaves behind the chemicals it brought in with it and the dissolved and suspended solids as well.

There is a difference, however. In a relatively tight steam system will have less 'stuff' in the water to concentrate in a boiler than a CT will, because a CT acts just like a sponge to pull out of the air whatever the air brings in with it, plus having to deal with what ever the make-up water brings in with it too.

I don't know if your formulae are right or not, so this is not an endorsement of those. You might get hold of a book called "steam" by B&W and see if it has any info about boilers as to what the practical limits are. Sorry, it has just been way too many years since I did boiler chemistry to remember the parameters.

rmw

RE: blowdown on boilers vs. cooling towers

The appropriate amount of boiler blowdown is empirical and depends a lot on the quality of the make-up water fed to the system.

It really has no similarity to cooling tower blowdown.

Recall that there are two typcal types of boiler blowdown: Continuous blowdown and muddrum blowndown.

The continuous blowdown draws from just beneath the water level in the steam drum. It is designed to draw all lighter undesireables from near the liquid surface. It's function is a lot like the skimmer on a swimming pool.

Continuous blowdown is routed to a blowdown tank and usually adjusted via a needle valve. Flow is typically 0.3 to 2% of total steam flow. The boiler vendor's recommendations are usually followed.

Intermittent or "muddrum" blowdown is done about once per shift or per day. and it is simply a blast from the bottom drums of the boiler. This is done, of course, to purge dirt and sediment and is performed more often after internal cleaning activities.

RE: blowdown on boilers vs. cooling towers

Well, the two formulas are very similar:

(Flow rate)/(cycles) or (flow rate)/(cycles -1)

For an emperical formula - is there enough difference to matter?

Or is the continuous surface blowdown mentioned above part of the missing "1"

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources