×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

AASHTO LRFD Design for Sheet Pile Cofferdams with Water Pressure (WA)

AASHTO LRFD Design for Sheet Pile Cofferdams with Water Pressure (WA)

AASHTO LRFD Design for Sheet Pile Cofferdams with Water Pressure (WA)

(OP)
Has anyone designed sheet pile cofferdams per AASHTO using LRFD where the major lateral load is water pressure? The load factor for water pressure is 1.0 whereas the load factor for earth pressure is 1.35 to 1.5. If the major load on the sheet piling is water pressure, the sheeting and bracing will be designed using a load factor of 1.0 and a sheet pile bending resistance factor of maybe 0.9 to 1.0. Therefore, the sheeting is being sized using, or very close to, the yield stress of the sheet pile steel. Essentially, there will be little or no safety factor in the design.

IF YOU HAVE DESIGNED WATER COFFERDAMS USING LRFD, please comment on how you handled the load factor to provide a proper safety factor. Thank you.

www.PeirceEngineering.com

RE: AASHTO LRFD Design for Sheet Pile Cofferdams with Water Pressure (WA)

Try getting hold of the Karl Hanson at www.dcalc.us Also try posting on Linkedin's Deep Foundation Institute forum.

RE: AASHTO LRFD Design for Sheet Pile Cofferdams with Water Pressure (WA)

using a water loading with a FS of yield stress in the sheet pile makes now sense even if the code recommends this.

This code is not conservative for this condition asce standard 7-05 requires factor load of 1.4(D+Fluid)

also another load condition is 0.9d + 1.0 E + 1.6 H(lateral or water pressure)

Min factored load should be 1.6 plus seismic as a minimum

RE: AASHTO LRFD Design for Sheet Pile Cofferdams with Water Pressure (WA)

I have noticed the same problem with AASHTO LRFD. The WA load factor is 1.0 for all load combinations which does not make a lot of sense if designing for water pressure alone such as a dam or cofferdam.

I am pretty sure that the LRFD concept is that there is no variability in the water pressure calculation (H*62.4 PCF) so a very low load factor is mandated, 1 in this case.

There is a similar situation with an impact barrier where the collision LF is 1.0 and there are no other loads. The resistance factors are only 0.9 or 0.8 so fairly low equivalent factors of safety are used.

I think in a cofferdam there would be increases in WA load due to waves and surges that might drive the load up a bit above a static load but that would be up to the designer.

It seems that the WA = 1.0 may be ok for water pressure in soil but not so good for stand alone water pressure. I suspect the ASCE values may make more sense.



RE: AASHTO LRFD Design for Sheet Pile Cofferdams with Water Pressure (WA)

(OP)
Thank you, all.

www.PeirceEngineering.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources