×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Which solver would be better for this case : Implicit or Explicit ?

Which solver would be better for this case : Implicit or Explicit ?

Which solver would be better for this case : Implicit or Explicit ?

(OP)
I am trying to simulate the inflation of an inflatable structure for one of our products. Currently I am using an explicit solver for it (explicit FEA+CFD) . The problem is the inflation time is 4 seconds. The analysis is highly non-linear with surface to surface contacts with outside bodies and also self contact. The material model is also non-linear with large deformations. It involves fluid structure interactions (employing both Eulerian and langrangian mesh). All these point towards explicit methods but given the time for inflation is 4 seconds means it takes a lot of time to solve (about 40 hrs currently) to solve for 4 seconds. Moreover the meshing is to be done keeping in mind the timestep needs to be as big as possible for a reasonable solving time.

I have been considering trying out an implicit solver (dynamic, coupled fluid structure) since it will allow me to use smaller elements without worrying about the timestep. However, I am worried if it will actually improve or increase the solving time. Cause issues with convergence due to the high degree of non-linearity. This would mean changing the solver we use as well, so license costs are another factor.

Which do you think is better suited for this problem ?

RE: Which solver would be better for this case : Implicit or Explicit ?

If you have a folded structure, it will be very hard (if not impossible) to calculate it using implicit methods. In abaqus, you can use fluid inflators to model inflation (typically used for airbags), to avoid using the FSI interactions. Other programs probably have similar options.

RE: Which solver would be better for this case : Implicit or Explicit ?

(OP)
Thanks, I think the methods you are talking about are uniform pressure methods ? Those don't capture the physics correctly for our problem though.

RE: Which solver would be better for this case : Implicit or Explicit ?

Yes they are.

RE: Which solver would be better for this case : Implicit or Explicit ?

Hi missil3, I agree with sdebock. For the inflatable structure using uniform pressure methods using fluid inflators to model inflastion for CFD simulation would be a good idea than using implicit methods.

RE: Which solver would be better for this case : Implicit or Explicit ?

(OP)
Uniform pressure methods won't work for our problem. It would have been so much easier if I could use that as it is very fast to solve.

RE: Which solver would be better for this case : Implicit or Explicit ?

You can try other techniques to make your simulation faster: mass/time scaling, selective subcycling (when using parallel solving), submodeling or substructures and coarsening your mesh.
Most things influence your solution accuracy though.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources