×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

(OP)
I have a naturally aspirated 2.5L boxer 4-cylinder engine. I would like to estimate brake specific fuel consumption sweetspot for my engine at partial load (say +50% based on MAP readings). I do have a chassis dyno curve which i thought some one could use here to help estimate BSFC from. Basically this is a 16 valve boxer 4 cylinder oversquare engine with variable valve lift (Not timing). I have been told valve lift occurs at high loads and/or higher engine speeds and that one intake valve is always open.

I have attached the dyno graph. Looking at the dyno, the engine has a relatively flat torque curve for a 4 cylinder. Peak torque occurs at 4400rpm and peak horsepower at near 6000rpm. AFR stays stoich until just under 4000rpm. My estimates for BSFC sweet spot are 1500-2000rpm at 80% and 2000-2500 at 60% load, but i'm not sure how valve lift at higher loads affects BSFC.

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load



Didn't Subaru start that option ~ 2005?
Does your car have an instantaneous MPG display option?
If not, there are some phone apps that interface with the OBD port and can display that info.
Or there are more expensive separate meter options.
Then drive the speeds you want and test.

A friend with a new normally aspirated Subaru insists his instantaneous mpg is better in 5th than 6th around 65 mph on the highway in our slightly hilly section of Eastern Massachusetts.

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

(OP)
it does have a MPG monitor but it's inaccurate since it works based on air intake volume from MAF sensor. sometimes up to 12% off. So it's not a good indicator for me. i'm not worried about my instant MPG but rather BSFC during acceleration. So i want to burn least amount of fuel for most power when leaving a red light.

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

If you're that obsessed about it you'll have to set yourself up to datalog a few parameters from the engine control. Namely, injector pulse width (or calculated fuel), time, and vehicle speed. From these you can integrate the fuel (or pseudo parameter) consumed over a given acceleration event. Once you have this capability I recommend you do a series of repeated accelerations as identical to each other as possible (e.g. same grade if not exact same stretch of road), and evaluate your experimental repeatability. If you're satisfied with it, go ahead and perform different acceleration scenarios and see if you can resolve an optimum method out of the data.
You also have to decide what criterion to use as a yardstick. Myself, I would use amount of fuel consumed to go an absolute distance, with the proviso that this distance must be sufficient for the slowest accelerating scenario to reach a given cruising speed, which must be the same for all tests.

"Schiefgehen will, was schiefgehen kann" - das Murphygesetz

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

If you look at a few BSFC plots for NA SI automotive engines as a rule of thumb the optimum BSFC point is at max torque rpm, typically at about 80% throttle.

Quite why this is so is an interesting question to which I have no pat answer.

However that assumes the torque curve is at optimum af ratio, yours is not. If you fully fueled it lower down you'd get more low down torque

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

(OP)
hey hemi i tried several runs couple months ago on a straight relatively flat road that's 400 meters long. It starts by rolling from a stop at different engine loads to reach 32mph.

observations :
Run....Load(%).......Shifts(RPM)....Consumption(L/100km)....Acceleration Time(s)...
A.........60%.............1800rpm.............11.5...........................17...
B.........80%.............2300rpm.............12.0...........................12...
C.........90%.............3000rpm.............11.9...........................9...

consumption is liters per 100km, so lower the better. Load is based on Manifold absolute pressure and NOT throttle.

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

I would agree with Greg Locock. With N/A SI engines, best BSFC at any given engine speed will normally be at MBT or peak BMEP. MBT implies 100% load and WOT. Just to be clear, in engine terms I believe "load" refers to torque, and not power. And the reason best BSFC at any given speed tends to occur at WOT is due to the significant effect on efficiency from pumping losses produced by any intake throttling. Reducing the need for intake throttling over a wide range of engine speeds is one of the main reason variable valve control strategies are now widely used on auto engines.

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

(OP)
yes i used to believe that efficiency would be best by doing WOT operations at peak torque. But after some tests i found that my consumption was increased by about %15-20 when accelerating at WOT to 4500rpm. After some investigation i found that the fuel mixture was enriched just before peak BMEP.

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

(OP)
PS. here is a BSFC chart for an N/A SI engine:


you can see that BSFC sweet spot is no where near the peak torque

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

hah, good one. OK, now explain how the max torque line doesn't define the max torque? That is, how can you have a bsfc number for values above the max torque line? I suppose it could be artifically throttled back, but that ain't a true max torque line in that case.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

(OP)
yea i've seen those which makes sense considering that most modern engines run stoich until higher engine speeds and some like mine have valve lift technology which further increases burn rate. seems like 2000-2500rpm is the magic number.

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

Quote (pickler)

hey hemi i tried several runs couple months ago on a straight relatively flat road that's 400 meters long. It starts by rolling from a stop at different engine loads to reach 32mph.
I can't make anything out of those data. If you follow my suggested method and understand what you're doing, you'll be able do the analysis yourself.

"Schiefgehen will, was schiefgehen kann" - das Murphygesetz

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

How are you defining 60/80/90 % load?

I wonder about the impact of the fuel use during 20 seconds of a 30 minute real life road trip. I'm guessing throttle control and dRiViNg during the other 29.6 minutes might swamp the results.

I was expecting others to comment on the quoted 12% innaccuracy of a MAF sensor. I'd think that would clobber the A/F ratio and emissions.

I'd repeat the test 30 times using ~ 1/2 throttle (effectively full throttle at low revs and shifting at 2500 or so.

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

(OP)
i didn't say my maf was 12% off i said my trip computer/MPG gauge was 12% off. that's a combination of fuel cutoff calibration, winter blend gas (evaporates in tank) and the fact that it doesn't measure how much fuel is being injected but how much air is being drawn in. Also as i said above i measure load based on MAP reading so when my map is showing 11psi i divide that by 14.5psi (atmospheric pressure) and i get 75% load. I don't have to go full throttle to fully load out the engine at 4th gear or 2000rpm, just 1/3 throttle will do that.

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

(OP)
hey guys i had some time this weekend to test for various loads with the impreza today. I drove around in all sorts of roads and conditions and tried to keep it as accurate as possible. I had a friend who would log time of acceleration, engine load, RPM and the resulting consumption for every run. Then I looked at the log and created charts on fuel used vs load and rpm. I then plotted these efficiencies as dots on the torque chart created on excel and ended up creating this graph:



basically higher the efficiency colour the better gas mileage. What i found was that at lower RPMS higher loads are beneficial, but as RPMs climb load must fall too. It might have some thing to do with the variable valve LIFT system (i-AVLS). Anyway during one run we managed to shift at low enough RPMS without logging or kicking in the valve lift and that's when we scored one of our best runs. each run was approximately 800 meters long. Beyond 3500rpm we found the efficiency to drop significantly no matter what the engine load was. Mixture was consistently enriched above 3500rpm. Sweet spot seemed to be 2100rpm with 6 in.hg of vacuum or approximately 30kw/45hp held steady at 1500-2500rpm.

thanks for the help.

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

That's a very pretty chart but how did you calculate efficiency? And does your plotting method allow you to mark, on the same chart, the data points from which the contours are determined?

"Schiefgehen will, was schiefgehen kann" - das Murphygesetz

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

Was the acceleration during those trials something you can 'live' with ?

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

where does 60/65/70/75 mph cruise end up?

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

(OP)
hemi, Efficiency was figured out using a OBD2 reader and logger. The lower the consumption for the run the higher the efficiency, the highest efficiency is considered 100%. The chart used to be covered in data points which i then joined together to form those islands using photoshop, as excel is very poor in creating areas. It also makes it simpler to understand but it is less accurate. Some small efficiency islands where omitted. Anyways i found that chasing small islands is a waste.

Tmoose, the acceleration rates are fine...35kW and shifting at 2500rpm allows me to flow with the traffic if not faster. For highway cruising i don't use BSFC data unless i'm pulse and gliding. Cruising at say 65mph requires 13kW which is no where near the 35kw sweetspot. But BSFC is not a helpful tool for cruising on a relatively flat surface. It does help in a sense that lower cruising RPM will benefit fuel economy due to lower friction but higher load in general means higher throttle which is not exactly what you want when cruising. For cruising I try to minimize speed and load to reduce drag on the freeway. Updated chart:



RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

I think Greg is right. Peak efficiency should occur at the torque peak, but without enrichment. AFAIK most engines at WOT REQUIRE enrichment at the torque peak to suppress detonation because they are designed to use up all the octane rating of the fuel. Reducing the charge pressure just a little by just a little throttling will take you out of enrichment.
I'm sure the charts shown are for normal engines that cannot run at the torque peak at WOT without enrichment and do not include any throttling.

BTW, throttling by restricted valving is still throttling. If pressure in the cylinder before compression is held below atmospheric, that's throttling. Yet valve throttling is indeed more efficient than plenum or intake tract throttling. Why?

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

Why is because, ideally at least, valve throttling is not imposing a pressure drop as charge flows across the valve, it is an on-off event (akin to Miller Cycle), so little energy is wasted pumping charge past the valve.

"Schiefgehen will, was schiefgehen kann" - das Murphygesetz

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

hemi, good point, but valve throttling techniques include cracking open the valves rather than ultra short duration at higher lifts. The latter is closer to the on-off, "chopper" type, flow control. The former is closer to butterfly or other high restriction flow control. I guess you can argue that even cracked open valves still have an element of the chopper function.

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

(OP)
One of the intake valves is in my NA Subaru engine is always in high lift mode to promote swirl as part of the variable Lift feature. I think this is why throttling doesn't affect it much. There are newer continuous variable valve Lift technologies that basically eliminate pumping losses almost entirely.

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

(OP)
valves in my NA Subaru...*

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

Pickler,

I'm not sure if I am missing something but BSFC is not generally measured transienttly. It is a figure that is quoted from steady state testing and involves the use of fuel weighers of some other means of accurately measuring fuel consumption.

I think that I know what you are trying to achieve but I am not sure this is the best way of going about it, nor do I think that BSFC is the metric you want to be measuring/optimising.

What is it exactly that you are trying to do/measure?

MS

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

(OP)
BSFC is measure of power developed vs fuel burnt. In short i want to find the optimum BSFC for my engine. So far from experiments best acceleration is achieved when engine is developing 50hp. This translates to about ~7in.Hg of vacuum (3/4 engine load) at say 2000rpm . My fuel economy has thus far increased by %5 accelerating this way.

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

Fascinating. I'd be interested to learn how you made this determination in a statistically significant manner.

"Schiefgehen will, was schiefgehen kann" - das Murphygesetz

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

Good question hemi. Another is what is the overall fuel mileage for a trip of a given distance. BSFC is an instantaneous measure. The duration of an acceleration phase counts as well. 3/4 power acceleration (or "part throttle") has long been the recommendation, but shorter duration full throttle acceleration has been claimed to be better overall.
Again, enrichment is the fly in the ointment of efficient operation, meaning that best fuel efficiency does not necessarily align with best thermal efficiency.

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

(OP)
as i said above I did try full throttle but it had significant negatives effects on fuel mileage even though my AFR was not enriched unless i went over 3500rpm. Also at high load i-AVLS switches from fuel economy cams to high output ones, similar to honda's i-VTEC.

here is one for a vtec honda engine.

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

That's a very plausible diagram, and for a fairly small engine I presume, based on the peak torque of only 90Nm. If I were attempting to accelerate with optimum fuel economy with that application, I would install a vacuum gauge and endeavour to keep vacuum in the vicinity of 10"Hg while accelerating, at the same time upshifting no higher than 3500rpm. In fact, that's pretty good generic advice for any similar spark-ignited application, non-boosted at least. Nothing much has changed. If one could produce such a diagram for an old-fashioned carbureted engine, the general map would be very similar, perhaps with contour values shifted up to some degree.

"Schiefgehen will, was schiefgehen kann" - das Murphygesetz

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

(OP)
I would think that lower displacement usually has lower friction due to smaller stroke and lower number of cylinders, so the BSFC sweet spot would be up higher in the diagram? As for carbureted I have no clue, there are very little charts out there on older vehicles that take friction into account. The Subaru 2.5L engine which has a oversquare design and coated pistons should have lower friction than most other engines on the market, so in theory I was expecting higher RPMs (in practice enrichment and friction loss does not allow this). Just for fun, here is a full throttle BSFC for a mechanically fuel injected 2.2L 1971 Porsche 911E:



Just like the Subaru it's a boxer engine with oversquare bore/stroke ratio and 4500rpm peak torque. Porsches claiming a 4000rpm BSFC sweetspot. again this is a full throttle BSFC which doesn't mean anything in the real world.

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

Is anyone aware of any software that could collect and process the necessary data to produce a BSFC map using an OBD connection?

Power would have to be estimated via an input of the road load coefficients of the vehicle.

For a given cruising speed requirement & tolerance, a 'pulse and glide' strategy could be devised to minimise fuel consumption, and indicated to the driver by a device connected to the OBD port.

Regards, Ian

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

(OP)
tools like scangauge 2 do exactly that but do not log the information. Also the reported horsepower numbers are grossly inaccurate at high loads. The only way would be a BSFC capable chassis dyno.

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

Ian- Your vhicle model could be a bit better than that, since you also know acceleration. You don't know wind and gradients.

I'd build a map of injector pulse width vs MAF vs rpm, or MAP or throttle opening instead of MAF.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: estimate BSFC sweetspot for partial load

I didn't have much luck Googling for a cheap / free OBD port data logger. That surprised me a bit as I thought it would be a common thing to want and someone would have produced a freeware version by now.

I have one of those ELM327 USB scan tools, which use a virtual COM port. Looks like the simplest way forward would be to snoop on the serial traffic between the non-logging scan tool and the laptop, and log that.

Regards, Ian

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources