×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Crazy displacement field for a simple model that should be giving reasonable results

Crazy displacement field for a simple model that should be giving reasonable results

Crazy displacement field for a simple model that should be giving reasonable results

(OP)
So, I'm a new guy with respect to Abaqus. I ran a model (for a very basic robotic arm) and I am getting reasonable stress values. However, I am getting an outrageous displacement values. I originally did not notice this since Abaqus automatically scales your results with the "Deformation Scale Factor". But once I changed the Deformation Scale Factor to 1, I got a displacement field that was complete nonsense (the arm expanded in size and then flattens like a pancake).

It's common to make simple mistakes and have outrageous errors in FEM software, but the reason this inaccurate displacement is so unexpected is because the stress distribution is reasonable and relatively small. Also, the model behaves basically as it should when the Deformation Scale Factor is at the automatic value that Abaqus calculates (about 4.5E-6 for my case).

The material properties are that of aluminum, there is no error in units, and the loads are of reasonable magnitude. The only items that are really unique to my otherwise basic model is that I use a kinematic coupling constrain to input a moment and there are no boundary conditions on the model, just forces.

Do you guys have any troubleshooting advice? Again the stress distribution is reasonable but the deformation is outrageous. It does not make sense to have a regular and expected stress value, then an outrageous deformation. Any help/ advice would be appreciated! Thanks!

RE: Crazy displacement field for a simple model that should be giving reasonable results

Uploading an image or, better, the INP will help us.

What kind of analysis are you performing? What type of element are you using? Do you have "sufficient" number of elements? Is the material property set correctly? Do you see any warnings in the .dat/.msg files?

http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=376
http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=1083

RE: Crazy displacement field for a simple model that should be giving reasonable results

Hi,

Quote:

I got a displacement field that was complete nonsense (the arm expanded in size and then flattens like a pancake).
For me it looks like you ran "Scale Factor" or "Harmonic" animation instead "Time History" in Abaqus/Viewer.
Please try Animate -> Time History.

Regards,
Bartosz

RE: Crazy displacement field for a simple model that should be giving reasonable results

(OP)
These comments are great. Thanks.

When I am back to my work computer I will check on the mesh, material properties, etc as well as whether or not I actually used the "Time History" animations in my viewer. If not I will try to upload the INP.

RE: Crazy displacement field for a simple model that should be giving reasonable results

(OP)
Just checked, and the material properties and sectional assignments are fine. Also I checked and I have indeed been looking at the time history animation, as opposed to a harmonic animation. So, unfortunately I have not solved my problem.

I have stress values around 10 MPa on aluminum, so I should not be getting outrageous deformation. I have realized something interesting though that perhaps you guys could help me out with. As I stated in my original post, there are no boundary conditions in my model, just forces/moments. When I input boundary conditions on my model, I get reasonable deformation (I restrict all degrees of freedom of a random group of nodes - this has no physical meaning, I just added them in the troubleshooting process). The type of deformation I get is essentially unnoticeable - which makes sense to me for 10 MPa on Aluminum.

So with boundary conditions, the job works. However, without boundary conditions, the results are still ridiculous. I obviously know that if the forces don't sum to 0, there will be translation, acceleration, etc, but this should be essentially a rigid body translation. What I am bothered about is the outrageous deformation , not the translation. The model expands and flattens, which is clearly inaccurate.

So far you guys have been helpful in my troubleshooting. Again, I am new to Abaqus so the problems might be obvious. I would greatly appreciete any advice.

THanks

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources