INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Notional Horizontal Loads

Notional Horizontal Loads

(OP)
Is there any NOTIONAL LOAD provision in ACI code as it is present in BS code.
The concept is to apply some %age of gravity load as horizontal load to the building and check its stability but I am not sure if this clause is present in ACI/UBC/ASCE/IBC?

RE: Notional Horizontal Loads

Never heard of any of that term in any of those publications.

Seems to me to be similar to a minimum sismic load though, or like a 1% minimum eccentricity on a concrete column.

What's the rationlle in the "BS" code (I assume you mean the British Standard)?

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
http://mmcengineering.tripod.com

RE: Notional Horizontal Loads

I do not believe notional loads are included in the ACI.

RE: Notional Horizontal Loads

In general that is correct - the ACI 318 specification primarily focuses on a magnified moment method to approximate second order effects in concrete frame structures.

However, the first paragraph of 10.10.1 (I think that is the section) does allow for a designer to use a true P-Delta type analysis as long as you include in that analysis considerations for cracking, shrinkage, etc.
ACI also adds the discouraging (and frustrating) sentence that says no matter what method you use with a second order analysis it MUST be a method that has proven to correspond to real-world behavior via testing (a hat tip to the professors out there I guess - to generate more research).

RE: Notional Horizontal Loads

I believe that the notional load is to be considered for the global stability of the structure and for the robustness of the connections. I would not be applying the "notional 1% lateral force" to a column depending on the framing system. The column is likely there to support gravity loads and the lateral loads will be taken out by shear walls and shear cores. So I would ensure that the lateral elements have the capacity for the notional forces but not covert the column axial forces to a horizontal shear load.

Generally for building design, if the building has been designed properly for wind and earthquake forces than it will be robust enough for the 1% notional force.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close