×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Pump Cavitation
3

Pump Cavitation

Pump Cavitation

(OP)
Please see attached drawing for detailed information.
The naphtha pump is pumping naphtha from the decanter. The decanter colects liquid from the steam stripper overhead condensers. The pump is experiencing serious cavitation problem. The tank bottom is 10 feet higher than the pump eye. The suction piping is 4" standard and the length is about 70 feet including all fittings.

The pump data sheet shows that the normal required capacity is 87 gpm and the rated capacity is 100 gpm. The pump data sheet also requires the minimum continuous flow is 80 gpm.

There is a minimum recirculation line with a manual open/close valve (by DCS). As the outflow is controlled by the tank level, the level control valve can be closed below the minimum flow while the manual valve is closed - historical data shows that sometimes the flow below the minimum continuous flow requirement.

My questions are:
(1) is the cavitation caused be the flow below the minimum flow? or
(2) The cavitation is caused by not enough NPSH available?

For the NPSH calculation:
Since Naphtha is a mixture with a broad boiling range, I think that the vapor pressure at the pump eye can be cancelled with the pressure of the decanter tank. Therefore, NPSH available is the elevation difference substracting the friction loss (about 0.6 ft liquid) or NPSH available is 9.4 ft liquid column.

For the NPSH required the datasheet shows the required NPSH is 6 ft (water). While the specific density for naphtha is 0.74, the required NPSH for pumping naphtha will be 6/0.74 =8.1 feet naphtha.

The margin for NPSH required is small. Is this the reason causing the pump cavitation?

Thanks in advance.

RE: Pump Cavitation

Most industry standards do not consider NPSH corrections for hydrocarbons. If you do want to check, it is much more complicated than dividing by SG. See link, but this correction will reduce NPSHr slightly, not increase it. You're going to get a very small number, and it is mostly an academic exercise.

http://www.pump-zone.com/topics/pumps/centrifugal-...


You need to check the temp rise through the pump at your low flow conditions to see if you are increasing temp (and vapor pressure) too much, that is most likely your problem.

http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/pumps-temperatur...

RE: Pump Cavitation

Additional details would help. What is the pump configuration? What is the suction specific speed? What is the best efficiency point flow? I suspect suction recirculation cavitation from low flow.

Johnny Pellin

RE: Pump Cavitation

I agree your naphtha is a bubble point liquid. 100 gpm in a 4" line doesn't sound like a problem, velocity is about 2.5 ft/sec, reasonable for a bubble point liquid.

The NPSHA for your pump is 6 ft of liquid, you don't need to correct for the SG of the naphtha. You can correct NPSHA for HC per 1Gibson's link but it's an empirical correction method based on recognition that cavitation with HC is less severe than with cold water.

You should have a pretty good margin, what is the pump head? Why do you think you have cavitation? Do you have anything like a suction strainer that could be partially plugged and taking more pressure drop than you think? Is there a spot on the suction that you can take a pressure reading and see how much head you have based on the pressure in the drum (use the same pressure gauge)?

RE: Pump Cavitation

"you don't need to correct for the SG of the naphtha" Echo that and add "should not". Otherwise you would conversely have to reduce the NPSHR if your product had an SG greater than water.

Independent events are seldomly independent.

RE: Pump Cavitation

(OP)
I appreciate all your responses. I know all of you are the most talented people in the forum. I attach the pump datasheet and pump curve for your information. I will send some damage photos when they are available.

For the pump configuration, there are two pumps for this service with one in operation and one standby. For the suction piping, there is no strainer and only one block valve.

The most serious damage is the casing at the suction side. The damage is caused by wear and cavitation (there is entrained solid in the naphtha but should expect to be minor) within a few weeks. The impeller is a closed impeller. There is some damage on the impeller surface at the suction side and the impeller. Some seal has beed eaten away. The frequency for the pump failure is about 3 every three months. Even the control valve at the recirculation line experiences cavitation (?) problem.

The proposed solution is to try to keep the flow in the recirculation line or to install a VFD for the pump to reduce the pump speed.

Thanks all of you again!

RE: Pump Cavitation

I do not see any damage that would suggest cavitation. Damage is more likely from erosion. I cannot view all of your pictures on my tablet. But deep cavitation damage would be very rare in naphtha.

Johnny Pellin

RE: Pump Cavitation

Have you a pump curve showing the duty point , impeller size and system curve? Could be the pump is poorly selected for the duty. Is the pump fitted with minimum diameter impeller?

“The beautiful thing about learning is that no one can take it away from you.”
---B.B. King
http://waterhammer.hopout.com.au/

RE: Pump Cavitation

What are your actual wear ring clearances? What is the extent of the "repairs" that are being done? Are you replacing the case wear ring, or only the impeller wear ring?

Looks to me like excessive flow across the wear ring area, causing erosion on the impeller shroud. Cavitation would be on the inside of the impeller eye, where pressure is reduced as velocity increases. Which, from the one picture, actually looks fine.

Only one photo was attached.

RE: Pump Cavitation

It is not cavitation, I have to agree with others erosion.

It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts. (Sherlock Holmes - A Scandal in Bohemia.)

RE: Pump Cavitation

(OP)
Thanks all of you for your valuable opinions. I have to agree that the damage of the pump is due to erosion. While I cannot answer all your questions, I attach the mechanical drawing for the pump and show where the damages are.

It seems to me that the extensive erosion on the casing is a little bit weired because in that area the liquid should not have the highest velocity because the impeller is a closed plate. I also don't understand why the pump at the rated capacity the effeciency is only 35% (datasheet and pump curve were attached on my second post). Hope someone can shed some light on this.

If the erosion is the main issue, opening the recirculation valve to maintain the pump flow may not be the solution to mitigate the pump damage problem. Potential solution may be to install VFD to reduce the pump speed.

Thanks.

RE: Pump Cavitation

You've got huge clearances in areas that should be maybe 0.020". That wear ring is the barrier between the suction and discharge areas, without it you are recirculating inside the pump. The impeller has done the work to move all that fluid, but it is not all coming out of the discharge flange because it is easier for it to recirculate internally.

Call someone in to inspect that knows what they are looking at, and then explain your proposed repair plan to the supplier you are using for replacement parts. Hopefully it is the pump OEM.

The only potential soluiton here is to restore and verify the wear ring clearances to API minumum values + no more than .0010" (being generous.)

RE: Pump Cavitation

(OP)
Hi 1gibson,

Even if I unwilling to admit you are right, the erosion mode predicts what you said. As a process engineer, I cannot believe that the apparant error cannot be found by our pump specialist and causing the pump failure again and again.

It is the very likely the root cause. I give you a star again.

Thanks,

RE: Pump Cavitation

(OP)
Actually, I rechecked the operating manual, the minimum clearance between the casing wear ring and impeller wear ring was followed API standard and is about 0.010". I haven't seen the wear rings after they were taken out and I am not clear how damage the wear rings are. I see the problem may be that the pump speed is too high (3560 rpm).

Thanks.

RE: Pump Cavitation

Damage in this area is likely corrosion / erosion from swirling. We have had good results using swirl breaks on these surfaces.

Johnny Pellin

RE: Pump Cavitation

From the picture there is more going on than first meets the eye. Please explain the "some broken hole inside impeller".
Where is the pump running on its performance curve?
Additional clear photo's of the damaged areas might also help.

It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts. (Sherlock Holmes - A Scandal in Bohemia.)

RE: Pump Cavitation

The case damage is classic 'steel worms' caused by turbulence. We have solved this using swirl bars and HVOF tungsten carbide. Sulzer is very familiar with this and has a well proven solution. The impeller damage looks like simple erosion, cutting vanes from below.

Johnny Pellin

RE: Pump Cavitation

The primary seal plan (12) does not appear to be working well. Solids are accumulating in the seal chamber and eroding the seal gland. I do not recall plan 12. I would consider plan 13 or add a cyclone to remove solids. I prefer plan 13 in erosive service.

Johnny Pellin

RE: Pump Cavitation

It would still be interesting to establish where the pump is operating on its performance curve. It may well be well back to the left causing a lot of recirculation within the casing, this is shown by the eroded surface on outer shroud of impeller and the "hole" thru' the impeller blade..
The effect of recir. other than from a hydraulic perspective, especially if there are solids in the flow is accelerated wear due to solids being pumped continuously around internally within the volute casing. In simple terms, if a solid enters into the inlet ideally you want it to pass thru' the pump only once and not over and over due to recirculation.

Pump-out vanes on impellers, anti-swirl devices all work but the greatest effect comes from operating the pump at or near to BEP.

It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts. (Sherlock Holmes - A Scandal in Bohemia.)

RE: Pump Cavitation

An absolute shocker selection for the duty, the curve is so flat at this point the slightest increase in head could push the duty point even closer towards CV. You say that it has a minimum flow line - does it work, is it utilised properly etc etc?

Now for the $64 question, you also get a set of stainless steel steak knives for the correct answer: Has the pump ever been flow tested in the installation, and is the minimum flow line operational and where does it return to?

I know nothing about pumping naphtha - but are there any solids in it?
I would still opt for recirculation within the casing.

Suggest you cut your losses and buy a new pump with hydraulics suited to the application - should be a lot cheaper in the long run.

It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts. (Sherlock Holmes - A Scandal in Bohemia.)

RE: Pump Cavitation

(OP)
Good point Artisi. You deserve a star.

Yes. There is some entrained solid in the naphtha. Even the recirculation control valve has some erosion issue.

Thanks.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources