×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Tetra and tria element

Tetra and tria element

Tetra and tria element

(OP)
After using FE methods for 15 years, I have been inactive from FE-analysis for some years, but are now again invovled in a composite material analysis project of a marine structure. I remember when using MSC/NASTRAN some years ago, a lot of scepticism arose from using tet4 and even tet10 elements. (Today I am using NX/NASTRAN) I have recieved a FE model from a customer, with almost only Tet10 and tria6 elements, and I have noticed that this is not unusual today to use these elements. My question is: Are tet and tria now accepted because of convenience or is the quality of the elements so much improved the last 10 years that stress results are acceptable? Or are the same elements used with just denser meshes?
Thanks for any input. Especially from long time FE specialists.

RE: Tetra and tria element

tet4s (and tri3s) bad, very bad ...

tet10s (and tri6) good

Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati

RE: Tetra and tria element

In general I'd avoid them as the results at high stress gradients tend to be irregular, ie. around the mid-side nodes you'll find the results stagger about. I'm not sure why that is but the results extrapolated to the mid-side node are a little 'stiff' for some reason. This doesn't give you much confidence in the results at these positions. Unless the geometry is extraordinary difficult, it's much better to partition the strucutre and aim for brick, or four sided elements in 2D. These days it's just lazy software that allows someone to just point and click and hey presto you have a mesh and pretty pictures. In addition, you need a lot more elements and nodes (nad so memory) to describe the model than you would need for brick type elements.

RE: Tetra and tria element

Fully agree with previous posts, I would not touch tet4s under any circumstances.

It takes a bit of time to prepare geometry but it's worth doing in order to generate a brick rather than tet10 mesh.

RE: Tetra and tria element

(OP)
Thanks guys. I can see that you are also concerned. And I see that almost any CAD provider is marketing the quick fix meshing solution. 3D geometry and tet meshing. Hmmm.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources