×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Stress Increase for Snow Load

Stress Increase for Snow Load

Stress Increase for Snow Load

(OP)
In previous additions of ASD design (specifically AISC and AISI) was it permitted to increase the allowable stress by 33% for stresses caused by snow loading. It has been suggested to me that this is the case, but I was only aware of the allowable stress increase for wind and seismic loading. I am evaluating an existing building (PEMB of course) to see if it will be economical to retrofit for an additional roof load or if an additional support structure is needed. I would like to model the building fully to determine what the original capacity was and therefore can present the owners with a clear view if additional support is needed. Thanks much!

RE: Stress Increase for Snow Load

For wood - yes - Not sure about ASD

RE: Stress Increase for Snow Load

I've never increased stress levels for snow for steel.

RE: Stress Increase for Snow Load

Done that for wind and seismic fr steel, but never snow. Wood - yes, but 1.15.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
http://mmcengineering.tripod.com

RE: Stress Increase for Snow Load

(OP)
Hmmm....When I reduce the snow load by a 0.75 adjustment factor, the attachment represents the flexural results from my model. It appears that it a large majority of the members are pushed to the limit or even a little overstressed (to be expected when modeling a PEMB) A few comments have said that they personally have never used it, but is anyone aware if the stress increase used to be codified or an industry standard of PEMBs circa 1970s?

RE: Stress Increase for Snow Load

As far as I know load combinations have been what they are for a long time. ASCE 7-05 section 2.4.1 gives combinations, but maybe local building code has something different (usually not the case). I think what you are refering to is D + 0.75*(L+S), which shouldnt control for a roof. The controlling combinations for gravity is likely D + S, where S includes any applicable snow drift. Note that for all other combinations with snow, it only needs to be the flat roof or sloped roof snow load.

PEMB's typically dont work to modern codes when checked, so expect to have issues analyzing the existing situation.

RE: Stress Increase for Snow Load

In the 1979 Edition of the UBC, section 2303(d), it states that:

"All allowable stresses and soil bearing values specified in this dode for working stress design may be ind=creased one-third when considering wind or eatrthquake forces either when acting alone or when combined with vertical loads. No increase will be allowed for vertical loads acting alone."

This implies no increases for USD concrete design, nor steel design. However a 1.15% increase was still allowed for wood for snow under section 2504(c)4,ii.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
http://mmcengineering.tripod.com

RE: Stress Increase for Snow Load

Personally, I think an increase in allowable stresses for snow load was a mistake. There are few loads more sustained than snow loads.

BA

RE: Stress Increase for Snow Load

(OP)
BA: Are you saying that a 1/3 increase for snow loading was previously permissible by some code?

RE: Stress Increase for Snow Load

No, I don't think it was ever as high as 1.33 for snow load. In CSA Standard 086-1970 for timber construction the load duration factor, kD was 0.95 for continuous, 1.0 for normal, 1.15 for 2 month (which included snow), 1.25 for 7 day and 1.33 for one day duration.

In CSA 086-2001, kD has only three categories, namely short term (1.15), standard term, which includes snow (1.00) and permanent duration (0.65).

For steel construction, load duration has never been considered.

BA

RE: Stress Increase for Snow Load

Personally, I think the snow load 1.15 increase for wood is good for most snow loads in the USA. As it is based on the maximum snow load only occurring once every fifty years plus/minus. There are areas that receive higher snow loads (60 psf or higher) in California/Oregon/Washington that require a 1.00 snow increase. I am sure that there is also many ares in Canada/Alaska that should also use the 1.0 increase for snow.

But, overall IMHO the snow load increase of 1.15 is a good factor for wood.

Garth Dreger PE - AZ Phoenix area
As EOR's we should take the responsibility to design our structures to support the components we allow in our design per that industry standards.

RE: Stress Increase for Snow Load

Just ran across an upcoming projecxt where the snos load is going to be in the order of 800 psf. That will be interesting. Done 400 before, but never 800. No a;;owable snow load stress increses here...

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
http://mmcengineering.tripod.com

RE: Stress Increase for Snow Load

(OP)
"...in the order of 800 psf." Wow! I have done 100 psf before and I thought that was bad enough. Is this in a mountainous region? Who determines that high of snow load?

RE: Stress Increase for Snow Load

Local Building Officials and the SEAW (Structural Engineers Association of Washington). Yes, it is literally at the top of a 7000 foot peak, and shedding the snow is not an optioue to the potential of creating an avalanche. Get my drift? :)

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
http://mmcengineering.tripod.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources