×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

insulated pipe heat loss
3

insulated pipe heat loss

insulated pipe heat loss

(OP)
hi,

I wonder if anyone can help me.....

I have been tasked to find out the heat loss of buried insulated pipework. I have spent ages looking online for help in this and managed to find an equation (attached) that takes into consideration the service pipe, insulation, and jacket pipe.

In my efforts to find such an equation, I found other (more complex) equations that contain things like Reynolds number.... I think this will be too complex for what I need. I just would like something relatively simple, relatively accurate. Does anybody know of such an equation? Ideally one that considers flow and return pipes at x distance apart.

Now, going back to the attached example, I worked through this and expected to reach a result of 33.7 Btu/h lf. Instead I came up with the answer of 41.6 Btu/h lf! I would be grateful to hear if anyone can get 33.7.....and how! Where am I going wrong?!!!

Thank you in advance,

Ben

RE: insulated pipe heat loss

Post your computation and we can find your error.

RE: insulated pipe heat loss

I get 34.21 from the numbers and equation supplied, which is a bit too much error, but it's certainly possible that there's a typo.

TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: insulated pipe heat loss

Ben,

I've got the same result as IRstuff's got. Just enter that formula in a spreadsheet, being sure you're using the right conversion from Btu inch/(h ft^2 °F) to Btu/(h ft °F).

RE: insulated pipe heat loss

Sorry,
I got 33.54
which is very close to the author's.
I'll bet the last term was the problem
It is ln(d/r-[d/r-1}^-2)/2pik
which is very close to
ln(d/r)/(2piK)

RE: insulated pipe heat loss

(OP)
Thank you so much for the prompt assistance!

From reading the replies I think that I wasn't converting from Btu inch/(h ft^2 °F) to Btu/(h ft °F - to be honest that thought never occurred to me! I was merely plugging in the numbers to the formula! Can anybody tell me the conversion?

In IRstuff's latest response: from looking at the calculation (bottom left) of ln(d/r4))/k4 = 2.0580 (Btu/(hr.ft.R)-1

I dont get this at all, I get 0.01338 - obviously I've made a an error somewhere, but where?

I'm using the units Btu, in, ft etc because they were in the example. The data that I will be inputting is metric with the final result in W/m. The conductivity is in W/m°C. the diameters in m. I thought that once I get my head around the formula I would just be able to plug in the metric values and end up with the correct units. Is this the case? Or is this not the correct way to go about it?

I attach my (brief) calcs that I did in Excel.

I apologise for the questions - its been quite a few years since I have done these kind of equations!

Thanks
B

RE: insulated pipe heat loss

1 Btu inch/(h ft^2 °F) = 0.08333 Btu/(h ft °F).

RE: insulated pipe heat loss

My bad .
Made a few errors in calc and now get 34.27 essentially in concurrence with
Irstuff and Ione.

RE: insulated pipe heat loss

"
In IRstuff's latest response: from looking at the calculation (bottom left) of ln(d/r4))/k4 = 2.0580 (Btu/(hr.ft.R)-1

I dont get this at all, I get 0.01338 - obviously I've "

Dissecting
ln(d/r4)=2.050 this is true also in metric units
k=12 btu-inch/hr-ft^2-degF
but inch/ft= 1/12
so K becomes
12/12=1 BTU/hr ft deg F and therefore
ln(d/r4)/K=2.050/1.0=2.050 (Btu/hr-ft deg)^-1

Hope this nor more confusing to you

RE: insulated pipe heat loss

not to beat a dead horse, but this is where a program like Mathcad, Studyworks, or SMath Studio shines. S

Sorry about the inverted units; I was too lazy to reformat the equations into the normal format, and I was too obtuse to tack the inversion on the LHS:

TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers

RE: insulated pipe heat loss

(OP)
Thank you once again,

Well, I'm embarrassed to say that I'm even more confused now!

I don't think I should have used the imperial units, BTU etc to start with. Having been taught everything in metric, the imperial world baffles me!

I find myself spending 'company' time in trying to get to grips with the example when I'll be using metric data anyway....

If I have the following:
Insulation: Thermal conductivity, ki= 0.024 W/m°C (PUR foam)
Casing pipe: Thermal conductivity, kc= 0.52 W/m°C (HDPE)
Carrier pipe: Thermal conductivity, kpp= 0.1 W/m°C (polypropylene)
Soil: Thermal conductivity, ks= 0.2 W/m°C

Carrier ID = 90mm
Carrier OD = 110mm
Casing OD = 200mm
Casing thickness = 40.1mm

Max temp = 140°C
Min temp = 100°C

Buried depth = 1m

From using the the simplified formula from IRstuff, I get a heat loss value of 17.22 W/m.

Can anyone spare a couple of minutes and see if they reach the same conclusion?

Thanks

RE: insulated pipe heat loss

(OP)
i have just run he calculation again and am now faced with another result! I now get 6.080 W/m :(

I have broken down the calculation spreadsheet and attach it. I hope it easy to follow. Can you see where i've gone wrong?

Please tell me what you meant by: 'Unclear whether your temperatures were the equivalent of the others, so I ran it two ways:'

can you tell me why you have QL(T1.22K)? where does 22K come from?

Help would be much appreciated.

RE: insulated pipe heat loss

I have problems verifying irstuff results.
One thing , the OP sizes are diameters and the last term would be incorrect.
Beyond this, I estimated the bracketed term about 37
which gives me about
Q=6.6 w/m
Could we differ by that much?

RE: insulated pipe heat loss

Ben,

You've entered a "2" in your cell E8 wich shouldn't be there (but this could be done to the buried depth's definition). This time I'm with zekeman as I've got 6.63 W/m

RE: insulated pipe heat loss

I used 22ºC in addition to the 100ºC because I wasn't positive that the 100ºC given was the "soil" temperature, since that's the boiling point of water. The answer for the 100ºC case was 7.28 W/m, since I had left it in English units.

The order in which the OP gave the new parameters is not consistent with with the textbook form... I added the 40.1mm to the casing radius, but I see now that it's the OD, so the 40.1 should be subtracted, which results in 9.6 W/m for T2=100ºC


TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers

RE: insulated pipe heat loss

(OP)
sorry for not being in touch sooner.

once again I'd like to express my gratitude for everyone's work. I've just been mailed an example calc which is used by our suppliers of steel pipe. When I work through the first example (p.1-3 which uses PUR insulation, PEX carrier and PE casing) I get the same results, so I am happy (i think). Example attached.

does this match your calculations? I'm not sure how exact the results we will ultimately use have to be, but i'm pretty sure a ball-park figure will do (+/-0.5 W/m).

Is this method good enough?

On sheets 4 and 5, another example is given but this time the thermal conductivity of the carrier pipe and casing has not been considered. I'm not clear why this is, i've contacted the source but have yet to hear a response (and don't think i will). I thought that perhaps the pipe was using a steel carrier - but the part number tells me otherwise.

the last 2 sheets (in polish) - i have no idea why these have been given!

any help would be gratefully received.

B





RE: insulated pipe heat loss

(OP)
thanks IRstuff,
note that in the first example, the Rex term is less than 1% of the insulation resistance??????


RE: insulated pipe heat loss

I thought you were asking why there were only 3 terms in the U1-U2 in the second set of calculations. Comparison with the first set shows that the two lowest resistances were dropped, presumably because they were negligible compared to the 2.979 mK/W term.

TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers

RE: insulated pipe heat loss

(OP)
ok, thanks for explanation.

In you opinion IRstuff, in theory I could take the method on the PDF (first example), plug in the appropriate values and and up with an approximate value for the heat loss? i.e. do the equation(s) look ok and does it match your MathCAD program?

I would like your opinion before venturing forth with this!

RE: insulated pipe heat loss

(OP)
Thank you IRstuff,

As the pipe work which our company supplies does (99% of the time) involve 2 pipes (flow and return), I shall use the equation shown in the first example of the PDF to obtain a figure for approximate heat loss.

I'll adjust the coefficients for different materials etc.

Thank you everyone, you have been most helpful.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources