×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Timber shear wall

Timber shear wall

Timber shear wall

(OP)
Why does the required capacity of smaller height timber shear walls increase as the height decreases, for the same drift limit?

The strain the walls is the same. Could the behaviour of the wall be governed by dynamic shear deformation, rather than strain? Why?

Thank you in advance.

RE: Timber shear wall

I don't understand your question. The required capacity of a shear wall is a function of the load applied to the wall. The deflection is a complicated expression involving height, length, properties of chord members, nail deformation and deflection due to anchorage details. Deflection is larger for a high wall than a short wall as one would expect.

BA

RE: Timber shear wall

Required capacity if a function of load, not shear wall height.

I don't understand the question.

RE: Timber shear wall

(OP)
Apologies, the word "required" should not be there (typo).

I am looking at an existing building with a basement which is partially below ground, partially above. The exterior walls are concrete to ground level and timber studs from there up. Interior walls are timber studs for the full storey height.

I have found that the interior studs and exterior studs are taking similar lateral loads. I am using a tool put together by a guy who has since left out company that calculates the probability of the element exceeding its drift limit.

The exterior and interior studs are assumed to have the same length, same shear capacity (5.2 kN/m)and are assumed to be capable o 3% drift. The tool was put together on the basis of quite a bit of testing an I have found that when I halve the story height (outside ground elv to main story elv) the wall's probability of failure/exceedance of drift limit increases substantially.

I'm just wondering does thi make sense to you, or have I found a bug in the tool.

Apologies for the lack of clarity in my original post.

RE: Timber shear wall

Doesn't make sense to me. May be a bug in the tool or may be an error in using the tool.

BA

RE: Timber shear wall

I always thought the opposite... If the aspect ratio of the shear wall governed by seismic forces goes beyond 2:1 (H:L), then the allowable stress in the wall also goes down by a ratio of 2w/h (Table 2305.3.4).

Perhaps I do not understand the question either...

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
http://mmcengineering.tripod.com

RE: Timber shear wall

Naggud,
Perhaps what the program is telling you is that the short exterior walls are much stiffer than the tall interior walls and as a result, they take a larger share of the load than the plan geometry would suggest.

In any case, it is clear that you should not be using the program because you do not have an adequate understanding of what it does and the person who wrote the program has left the company.

BA

RE: Timber shear wall

(OP)
Thanks for your help guys.

I managed to get in contact with the guy involved.

Based on testing and non-linear analyses, the behavior of the walls is governed by dynamic shear deformation, rather than strain(which is the same as drift limit %). For shorter ‘stiffer’ walls a given deformation and ongoing cyclic loading results in more inelastic behavior, movement further along the inelastic plateau, and reaching the degradation portion of the backbone curve sooner. Thus the need for more strength to offset this behavior.

He indicated it was clear to see in all the results of the non-linear incremental dynamic analyses, and the tests; but not intuitively obvious !

RE: Timber shear wall

So what he is saying then, is that the behaviour is much like CMU walls where the shorter stiffer walls pick up a disproportionately greater share of the load based on the rigidity of the wall. That makes sense.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
http://mmcengineering.tripod.com

RE: Timber shear wall

(OP)
For this case, for my question, in theory the rigidity of the walls does not affect the loads applied to these walls. We are assuming these walls are taking the same lateral load.

I think the fact that the inelastic plateau is longer in a taller wall means that more deformation can be undergone by the wall without failure than the shorter "stiffer" wall which has a shorter inelastic plateau.

The shorter wall requires more strength to ensure that inelastic behavior is offset.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources