×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Detecting source of water damage - from water main?
2

Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

(OP)
I observed a site yesterday where observable ground movement has started to cause displacement and overturning in deck post footings and adjacent retaining walls. This building complex was built almost 30 years ago, and this recent movement has only occurred in the last two-three weeks. It appears this movement is being caused by an increase in hydrostatic pressure, seemingly due to a significant increase in below-surface water flow. It has been very cold (-20F to 10F) here, so it is highly unlikely that this is a natural spring popping up, or a natural rise in the groundwater level.

My first reaction was a water line leak, but the HOA representative said the Water District came out and tested the water for chlorine and found none. So they conclued it was "not their problem." I vaguely recall a conversation years ago with an individual who stated that a lack of detectable chlorine levels in water does NOT preclude this water coming from a treated water pipe. Anyone know more about this?

An issue similar to this one popped up about five years ago at a single-family house and the water district (another one) tested the water for chlorine, found none and said it wasn't their problem. After months of finger-pointing, it turned out a leaky water main was the culprit, so needless to say I'm hesitant to trust this most recent investigation by the water district.

Discussion and thoughts would be appreciated.

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

All semi-government offices lie. Go with your gut. Get it indpendently tested.

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

I always enjoy a good mystery, especially engineering related. Out of curiosity, what indications of water are you seeing? Do you know if the retaining walls were constructed with a drain system behind them?

As far as the cold, is that unusually cold for your area or is it annual? The freeze/thaw would be my guess as the culprit, but if it is normal it wouldn't explain the recent problem.

I wouldn't take the water district's word for it either.

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

(OP)
Indications of water: Lots of freezing water at the base of the retaining walls, more than the HOA rep has ever seen. The property manager installed some heat tape on the ground at the base of the wall last week and it is now producing a detectable flow of water around the tape. Property manager said the water melted and "went away" during a few warmer (above-freezing) days we had recently. This is right next to a river, so I'm expecting very porous (river-rock) soils, which may explain why the water dissipated during warmer weather.

It does not appear that retaining walls have drains (only 4'-5' in height). Cold freezing weather is the norm here - usually don't see these issues arise until spring runoff (April-June), assuming they are caused by groundwater/springs.

If I got it tested, any ideas what should be tested? I think I need something else besides chlorine. Maybe I recommend the owner go directly to a pipe leak detection company (I've heard good and bad about both the results and costs)?

Because it could be a leak from their water service line (not a main), one idea was to turn the water off to the building and see if the leak at the base of the wall stops.

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

turn off all valves and then observe the water meter. if it is still spinning, your service leaks. lack of chlorine residual in your water sample is not a valid test, once it leaks into the ground the residual chlorine will react with organics in the soil and quickly dissipate. you might test for Trihalomethanes (THMS)

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

When we are testing for treated water, we test for Flouride. Chlorine tends to disipate to very low levels very quickly. There are some areas of the country that have low levels of naturally occuring Flouride, so you need to check that you are not in one of those areas.

I agree with some of the other posts, not sure that I buy that it is a leaking water line causing the problem, could be, just not convinced yet.

Good luck.

Mike Lambert

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

There are a variety of leak detection methods you could use to check the water main, and water service, for leaks. A leak of this magnitude would be pretty easy to locate.

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

(OP)
That's the direction we are going right now... possibly testing the water and also hiring a leak detection company.

I think we need to verify it's not from a water leak before we start designing for something more substantial.

Thank you for all comments. I will keep you posted.

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

Water companies use ultrasonic detectors to listen for water leaks from underground water mains before digging. Do the same.

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

If there is a hydrant nearby, put a short pipe on the hydrant nut (top) and place your ear on the other end of the pipe. Should hear a hissing noise if a leak anywhere near.

Richard A. Cornelius, P.E.
WWW.amlinereast.com

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

(OP)
Update: water leaks were not detected during today's inspection so we are now convinced we are dealing with groundwater. We are now going to dig some test pits, uphill of the problematic area, to try to locate the source and determine if capturing and re-directing the groundwater is feasible.

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

Thanks for the update (I know folks on this list really appreciate follow-uo on these inquiries). Richard, many years ago I helped a Contractor who was having trouble passing the required hydrostatic test on a new 48" diameter pipeline installation (and who couldn't find the leak in the buried piping). When I got to the site it was indicated a quite high hydrostatic pressure was required (in excess of 250 psi, that I knew was beyond the normal seat test requirements for some large valves), so I asked what were the boundaries of the test section (i.e. were they testing against any valves etc.?) The answer was yes, and they then were able to rather quickly expose for me at least some of a large, buried in-line butterfly valve.
I took what could maybe best be described as a quite large steel "breaker bar" (socket holder/handle) I got from the Contractor and put one end of the bar against the exposed valve case while at the same time pressing the smooth convex end of the handle against my earway. When I did so, I could clearly hear leakage, and so could others there with the same sort of miracle tool (that they could hear unseen leakage with as well). Without recollection of all details/protocols used then, I know man-entry in the downstream side of the valve sure 'nuff found a stream of leakage going by the closed valve seat. The rubber valve seat was adjusted for tighter seal, and the Contractor then passed his test at the required high pressure level. I guess the principles by which I was able to hear this leak are similar to your "pipe" suggestion, that took me down this memory lane.

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

the leak inspectors in Mpls used old telephone ear peices to do the same. These were the old box phones that hung on the wall and you cranked them to get an operator. They just installed a nail to the back of the speaker in it. they were still using them when I was there in the 80's. Old science is sometimes better.

Richard A. Cornelius, P.E.
WWW.amlinereast.com

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

Sounds to me that the retaining wall doesn't have any drainage immediately behind it, allowing hydrostatic pressure to build beyond the capacity of the wall.

I wonder if constructing a 4" slit trench about 4-5 feet deep with a trencher, then installing a 4-inch perf pipe and back filling with a gravel might work. Perhaps 3-feet behind the wall along it's length, and find somewhere to daylight the perf pipe either through the wall or around the side.

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

(OP)
GD - We've thought about installing a drain directly behind the wall, but it would require a large excavator. We need a heavy piece of equipment to dig through the frost. But getting access for this piece of equipment to the wall will require the removal of about 40-50 mature lodgepole pines and the removal of stairs and a carport. In order to avoid this, we are planning on digging test holes about 50' uphill of the walls. Assuming we locate the water source, we will install a curtain drain and daylight the discharge pipe via gravity-flow.

If we do not locate the water source in this area, we will probably be forced to get down behind the walls (where we know we will find the water source). The HOA will have to decide if the removal costs (and removal of irreplaceable trees) will be worth the costs. They are also discussing the possibility of not spending this money now and see how much worse the situation gets - certainly not something the design team is recommending, but pretty typical for HOAs.

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

Civilman72,
What I was thinking of is a trencher, like a 'Ditch Witch'. They come in a variety of sizes from those that you ride on to hand pushed models (have seen rentals for them at Home Depot as well). There is a boom that is lowered with revolving blade like a chainsaw with bits for digging out narrow width trenches, usually for conduit or small piping, maybe 4-5 feet depth max, perhaps 4-inches wide.

That could probably be navigated between the pines to the wall. Then could dig a narrow trench, stuff a 4" perf pipe w/sock at the bottom, and backfill with 3/4 inch minus gravel. Daylight the pipe somewhere out the wall or around the side. (Not sure if the wall has any tie-backs, which would interfere with the trench idea.)

Since you mentioned mature trees in the area, I wonder if roots might not also be a factor, pushing on the wall. Could excavate behind a damaged portion of wall and see if there are any roots. Those ditch witch machines don't do well with roots I don't think.

You can upload pictures to this website I believe. Be good to see what the wall/site conditions look like. Might give others ideas on how to fix.

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

(OP)
GD - I will see if I can snap some photos next time I'm out there and try to download.

I know what you mean by a trencher, but (according to the contractor) they do not work in 4'-5' of frost.

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

(OP)
cvg - that's some impressive equipment. But the size of these trenchers are not much different than a large excavator and will present the same access issues as mentioned previously.

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

First rule of a site visit is take pictures!

What part of the world is this in? I wonder if groundwater subjected to a regular freeze/thaw cycle against the back face of the retaining wall over time hasn't adversely affected the integrity.

Any reason you can't wait until the spring thaw to make repairs or even make more observations? Seems that would be a better time if the ground is frozen.

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

(OP)
GD,

1. You're right - I should have taken photos on my first visit.

2. Rocky Mountains - Colorado - 9,000 feet. According to the property manager (for the last 5 years) they have not seen any issues with the integrity of the retaining walls, until the last month. Melting/freezing water was also never observed, but is now overtopping the wall and inundating the adjacent concrete sidewalk (interestingly enough, the building crawl space is dry). While this could be a case of fatigue over time, the wall movement seems to be directly related to the recent events.

3. The snow will not normally melt in this area until June. Considering the significant recent movements, it does not seem prudent to wait four months to further investigate. We feel that if we can control the hydrostatic pressure behind the walls now, we may be able to salvage the walls by repairs (in the spring/summer). If we wait, there's a good chance they will have to be completely replaced.

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

too busy skiing, let me guess Silverthorne or Keystone, Vail, Dillon or Frisco or Breckenridge (no wait, Breckenridge is at 10,000). Good luck with this, it is going to get very mushy in March and April.

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

(OP)
cvg - all good guesses... This is about 5 minutes from Winter Park.

Are you really skiing right now?

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

(OP)
Update:

We dug two test holes yesterday about 50' uphill of the retaining walls - 15' in depth. Found a seam of moisture at about 6'-7' below grade, with soaked granular/sandy/boulder soils beneath that. A few hours after the holes were dug there was 1'-2' of standing water, but seepage from the sides of the trench had significantly decreased.

I took some basic measurements and developed a rough cross-section of the site, and created an assumed "water table" elevation through the site, starting from the water level in the holes down to the adjacent stream. It indicates that at the current water level in the holes, hydrostatic pressure will be induced on the back of retaining walls adjacent to the building. It also indicates that if we can control the water level in the test hole area to 10' below grade that there's a good chance the hydrostatic pressure behind the walls will be eliminated.

Over the next few days, the contractor will install temporary sumps pumps in the holes. These will discharge into a tank to determine how much water is pumped, and the downhill retaining walls will be observed to see if this area appears to dry up. If the results are positive, we are currently discussing the option of installing a french drain in the current hole location (at least 10' deep), with a daylight to surface past the buildings in order to permanently control the groundwater level.

One concern I have is the potential for building settlement if we potentially reduce/change the current hydrostatic pressure beneath the building footings. Comments?

Any thoughts or additional comments would be appreciated.


RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

Drill holes through the face of the wall every 3-5 feet about 6 feet in. Stuf a perforated PVC pipe into the holes and push some filter fabric in the pipe to filter the drainage. Wait till spring thaw.

Richard A. Cornelius, P.E.
WWW.amlinereast.com

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

(OP)
Dick - Interesting idea, but the wall is next to a concrete sidewalk, attached to the building, so there would be no place for the drains to (safely) discharge. Plus, in this climate, all of those outlet points would freeze and be impossible to maintain.

RE: Detecting source of water damage - from water main?

(OP)
Final Update (hopefully):

It appears that the pumps are working. The first day the pumps ran they filled a 500 gallon tank overnight. The flows have stabilized and have been pumping a steady flow of 220-240 gallons per day. Prior to the pumping, ice buildup around the lower retaining walls was thawed. Since that time this area has remained dry.

The permanent fix will be to install french drains in the current location of the uphill pumps along with drains a few feet behind the existing retaining walls.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources