×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Aliphatic Polyurea Coating

Aliphatic Polyurea Coating

Aliphatic Polyurea Coating

(OP)
Hi everyone,

Quick question here. I work for a company that owns a coating company used for construction. One of the products we offer is aliphatic polyurea, which can be painted onto concrete or steel as a sealant. We've had problems with the material failing on job sites, and we've sent out samples of our product to a third party lab to test tensile strength and % elongation. We report 450% elongation and 3200 psi on our spec. sheet, but the third party testing found 12% and a tensile strength of 3200 psi. Clearly something isn't right here so I have a few questions:

1.) My understanding is that aliphatic polyurea is a very flexible material and is considered an elastomer. 450% elongation seems more correct than 12%. I called the test lab and he said the material he received was already cured and very hard like a plastic. This doesn't seem right, but the tensile strength was there. Also, we test this to ASTM D2370 instead of ASTM D412...which one is more correct? Also, if we had a test sample that was 40 mils thick and pulled at 20 in/min vs. a 0.125" thick sample pulled at 2 in/min, should our % elongation still be pretty much the same value?

2.) Is aliphatic polyurea considered an thermoset elastomer or a thermoplastic elastomer?

3.) If we did in fact supply the correct material, how could it be possible to see 12% elongation. Is it possible for something to go wrong with the reaction to produce these results?

Any help would be much appreciated!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources