Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
(OP)
Hello all,
I am looking for some feedback regarding a request from a supplier.
One from our supplier is requesting that shaft keys and keyways be toleranced on our prints in such a way that the keyways would *always* be bigger than the keys. For instance, if standard tolerancing on stainless keys is, say, 0.250 +0.000 / -0.004, then the shaft keyway should be 0.251 +0.xx / -0.000 so that there is no possibility that the key and keyway would be the same. (We were shown a drawing where a key was 0.250 +0.000/-0.004 with a keyway of 0.250 +0.xx/-0.000 so it’s possible that *both* could be 0.250, still be in tolerance, but not fit.)
My argument is that the standard (I believe is ANSI B17.1) should be followed as we have now on our prints. Is anyone else having this issue?
Regards,
C
I am looking for some feedback regarding a request from a supplier.
One from our supplier is requesting that shaft keys and keyways be toleranced on our prints in such a way that the keyways would *always* be bigger than the keys. For instance, if standard tolerancing on stainless keys is, say, 0.250 +0.000 / -0.004, then the shaft keyway should be 0.251 +0.xx / -0.000 so that there is no possibility that the key and keyway would be the same. (We were shown a drawing where a key was 0.250 +0.000/-0.004 with a keyway of 0.250 +0.xx/-0.000 so it’s possible that *both* could be 0.250, still be in tolerance, but not fit.)
My argument is that the standard (I believe is ANSI B17.1) should be followed as we have now on our prints. Is anyone else having this issue?
Regards,
C





RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
I typically use +0.002/-0.000 on the width and ends of the keyway, +0.000/-0.002 on the key. That gives me a total clearance of 0.004/0.000 inches on width. That way the key doesn't rattle around in the pocket when the piece is in motion.
This isn't rocket science. It is very logical and practical, which is what your vendor is suggesting.
Regards,
Cockroach
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
Just to understand this better, do you dimension the key as 0.250 +0.000/-0.002 and keyway 0.251 +0.002/-0.000 ?
Regards,
C
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
My questions are: Is this the only supplier making this request? Is it possible that they have keys that are out of spec?
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
"KEY-KEYSEAT ASSEMBLIES" tolerances are a funtion on class fit, type key and size.
Class 1 - A relatively free fit applies only to parallel keys.
Class 2 - A side fit (possible interference or clearance)
Class 3 - An interference side fit.
Side to side and top to bottom fit
for up to Classs 1 square key 1/2" width
Width Tolerance
Key +0/-0.002
Seat +0.002/-0
Depth Tolerance
Key +0/-0.002
Shaft keyset +0/-0.015
Hub keyset +0.010/-0
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
RobinHandy and boo1
From what I was told, the supplier claims that our tolerance are based on carbon steel keys and not on stainless steel keys. So far, this is the only vendor asking for this change, but as you mentioned, there is a standard for keys and keyways and what he's asking is not quite making sense... His claiming that if his going with the standard dimensions and tolerances (0.250 +0.000/-0.002 on the key and 0.250 +0.002/-0.000 on the keyway) at the max key and min keyway you have a problem and the components are not going to fit and that is why his proposing 0.250 for key but 0.251 for keyway.
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
“Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively.”
-Dalai Lama XIV
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
This tolerance is independent of material
O CL is a perfect fit, chill the key in dry ice
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
Ted
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
A line-to-line fit is not an issue. If it comes across as ewh described a few passes with a flat file on the key can take care of it. Isn't the key the less costly component to match?
NEMA motor shafts are typically shipped with a pre-fit key. I am sure, that within the ASME standard, a key or two may be too tight, but a shaft will eventually come around to match if one is not will to perform fundamental mechanic/millwright tasks.
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
The print doesn't tell them how to manufacture the piece. It tells them what is needed. Up to them to get compliance to your ISO system level of inspection. Lay that one on them. You need 0.250 +0.002/-0.000 inch on the Key and 0.255 +0.000/-0.002 inch on the keyway. Done deal.
If you inspect and there is a failure to comply, bound the piece or find a different supplier who knows how to read a print and hold a tolerance. You need to be tough on these jokers, OMG, stainless steel has a different tolerance than carbon steel alloy. Now I heard it all!
Regards,
Cockroach
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
Ted
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
David
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
Regards,
Cockroach
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
Ted
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
Desertfox
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
"The key is responsible for preventing rotation between the shaft and the bore, and carries a portion of the torque load. Improperly fitted keys and keyways -either too tight or too loose- can result in mechanical failures. Therefore, to ensure appropriate fit, the width and height dimensions of standard key and keyways must be held to recommended tolerances."
Addition reference:
http://www.mpta.org/
MPTA B1c-2010
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
disclaimer - The following links lead to images that some viewers may find disturbing. Intended for mature audiences only.
Viewer discretion advised.
http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a53/whitfimb/ZuIF...
http://i27.tinypic.com/4qlb3r.jpg
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT8iCj84J4...
http://imageshack.us/m/233/1615/img0253cn.jpg
http://i417.photobucket.com/albums/pp254/whhrsfan/...
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
http://www.keysandpins.com/products/keysteel
If you can find out what the clients exact cocern about the keyways is, why can maybe give better advice, also what is the application of the keys/keyways.
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
Thank you for all your input!
I will try to answer some of the questions.
Is not the customer who is pushing the change. The manufacturer is concerned that a drawing where a key was 0.250 +0.000/-0.004 with a keyway of 0.250 +0.004/-0.000 so it’s possible that *both* could be 0.250, still be in tolerance, but not fit. Galling it was not presented as an issue.
I also told them that if this situation occurs, running the key twice on a scrub pad will solve the problem. I was asked, so who will do that? The manufacturer or the customer? Since we are a customer oriented company, we do not want to "upset" them and we rather go the extra mile and do odd things.
C
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
----------------------------------------
The Help for this program was created in Windows Help format, which depends on a feature that isn't included in this version of Windows.
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
As a manufacturer, I have never been worried about the odds of a max key fitting a min keyseat.
Ted
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
It's easier for the manufacturer to grind the Key's flat. & hold .250 -.001/-.004
as a matter of fact it should be a piece of cake to hold .250 -0005/ -.0010
it's always easier to machine the key than to mill out a keyway, on a shaft. its very easy
to broach a keyway in bore with in .0005" tolerance with no problem
if the manufacture is milling the key width it should be easy to maintain .001" tolerance
The manufacture is making excuses. for bad manufacturing practices.
Mfgenggear
if it can be built it can be calculated.
if it can be calculated it can be built.
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
So 0.252/0.250 inch on the Key, 0.253/0.255 inch on the ways. What's with the size-on-size or that 0.250 inch coincidental measure?
Regards,
Cockroach
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
Holding 0.250" on a 2 thousands tolerance can easily be maintained on both machining the keyway and grinding the key.
Just to clarify (again),
You need 0.250 +0.002/-0.000 inch on the Key and 0.250 +0.000/-0.002 inch on the keyway. (copied and adjusted the answer from Cockroach).
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
& the keyway I would hold to .252-.251" so that it would assemble easily.
& no engineering design change required. It would fall into the original tolerance.
at the worst conditions there is .002" or .001" per side. which works fine.
or .004" or .002" per side.
Mfgenggear
if it can be built it can be calculated.
if it can be calculated it can be built.
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
RE: Standard tolerancing on stainless keys and keyways
Ya that's cool when it needs to be tight. :>)
Mfgenggear
if it can be built it can be calculated.
if it can be calculated it can be built.