×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

IBC 2009 Chapter 34

IBC 2009 Chapter 34

IBC 2009 Chapter 34

(OP)
I don't know why I am always having questions with Chapter 34 of the IBC but I do.

I was asked to look at an existing wood structure that was built in 1951. The existing structure has a hip roof formed out of plywood plate trusses with conventional framing at each hip end. There is some concern about an addition that is going onto the building and the additional loading the additional framing will be placing on the existing structure. We have been asked to submit a proposal to investigate the structure to make sure the roof is acceptable, if not, propose a fix for the roof to support the new loads.

The problems comes up because the GC has all of the original drawings from when the structure was built (amazing). At the end of each hip, the structure was suppose to have a double truss. A field visit reveals that there was only 1 truss installed. It has been this way for the past 60 years and there is no sign of distress in the roof.

We planned on trying to use section 3403.3 of the IBC (the 5% allowable increase) but now we are not sure if we can. What do others think?

RE: IBC 2009 Chapter 34

Are these prefab wood trusses (with shop installed press plates) or were the trusses hand built?

If these are pre-fab, the shop may have value engineered the design and got 1 to work.

RE: IBC 2009 Chapter 34

(OP)
These trusses have plywood plates. They were hand built. The building is 1 of 50 in the complex. All the trusses are exactly the same so I imagine they may have been built in a shop....but given the age, I'm not sure.

RE: IBC 2009 Chapter 34

The question is not whether you can or can not (basically if you will be called to task by the building official), but whether you should. In my opinion, you should not, at least until you have investigated the potential discrepancy. I use the work "potential" as this single truss may have been designed differently or altered in RFI or shop drawing process.

My suggestion, analyze the truss. If underdesigned, do not add load unless you take care of it by strenthening. If the truss is %50 percent underdesigned, I would not feel comfortable making the situation worse, the "straw that broke the camels back".

RE: IBC 2009 Chapter 34

Pick a high stress joint. Count the number of nails/staples in each member for the hip and standard trusses. If the hip trusses has twice (plus/minus) the nails/staples of the standard truss or has larger (longer and clinched?) nails, hand calculate the forces in the joint. Divide the forces by the number of nails.
Are the force per nail reasonable?
If you need to, you can download the 1944 NDS from http://www.awc.org/standards/nds.html. At the lower right of the page. Click on the “NDS Archives + Historical Design Values” button.

Garth Dreger PE - AZ Phoenix area
As EOR's we should take the responsibility to design our structures to support the components we allow in our design per that industry standards.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources