×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

flatness tolerances for "stock" material

flatness tolerances for "stock" material

flatness tolerances for "stock" material

(OP)
Several people at my company always put flatness tolerance callouts on faces that are indicated as being "stock" dimensional thickness and then use them as a datum, typically Datum A. We're not talking sheet metal here either, we're talking stock anywhere from 1/4" plate to 1" bar stock. I always wonder if that's "legal". It seems that we're telling the machinist to use the stock material, but ensure that it meets some flatness tolerance. In some cases the flatness is specc'ed as 0.2mm for 1/4" thick aluminum plate over a distance of a meter! Other times they call out flatness of 0.2mm for a 3/4" stock thickness piece only a couple of inches long and call that out as Datum A. Is it right to call out a flatness tolerance on material listed as "stock".

Thanks,
Courtmann

RE: flatness tolerances for "stock" material

(OP)
Thanks for the redirect, MintJulep. This thread seems mostly concerned with tolerancing the dimension specifically rather than flatness. After further search I'm wondering if using the flatness tolerance with the free state modifier might be appropriate (at least for the larger 1/4" to 1/2" plate pieces). It still seems somewhat ridiculous to me to flatness tolerance finished pieces only a few inches long made from 3/4" stock with "stock" called out for the thickness.
Any other responses on the appropriateness of flatness and perpendicularity tolerancing finished pieces largely using stock dimensioned material would be appreciated.

RE: flatness tolerances for "stock" material

Well, Y14.5 says that Rule #1 doesn't apply to stock sizes, because it's understood that stock materials already have other commercial standards governing the form. So I would say that a flatness spec is not required for a stock size, but to add one is not wrong; it's just being more specific.

John-Paul Belanger
Certified Sr. GD&T Professional
Geometric Learning Systems
http://www.gdtseminars.com

RE: flatness tolerances for "stock" material

On second thought, Rule #1 refers to an automatic form control on a feature of size. You are asking about form (flatness) on a surface, so my previous post isn't all that relevant. But the conclusion is the same: flatness on a surface of a stock material is perfectly fine.

John-Paul Belanger
Certified Sr. GD&T Professional
Geometric Learning Systems
http://www.gdtseminars.com

RE: flatness tolerances for "stock" material

It's pretty rare I receive flat stock that is flat. Unless you order it with a specific flatness, expect to machine it to your flatness.

Chris
SolidWorks 11
ctopher's home
SolidWorks Legion

RE: flatness tolerances for "stock" material

(OP)
Well I guess my question really comes down to just what am I telling a machinist/fabricator when I apply a flatness tolerance (or straightness or perpendicularity tolerance, for that matter) to a surface that is also dimensioned as being "stock"? It seems like I should have one or the other but not both. Should the stock dimension be given as reference?
Thanks

RE: flatness tolerances for "stock" material

Stock size has a tolerance by default. Is the flatness that you wish to apply to the surface a smaller tolerance?

John-Paul Belanger
Certified Sr. GD&T Professional
Geometric Learning Systems
http://www.gdtseminars.com

RE: flatness tolerances for "stock" material

(OP)
That's just it, Belanger, I DON'T want to apply a flatness tolerance. I think it's contradictory to specify that something is both "Stock" thickness and to apply a flatness tolerance to it. It's that it seems to be standard practice at my company that makes me ask the question. As I said in my first message sometimes the flatness tolerance they call out is insane, like flat to 0.2mm on a 1/4" aluminum plate 800mm long which is going to be welded into an assembly. Then they'll call out that "flat" face as a datum. Similarly, they'll apply a 0.2mm flatness tolerance on the flat face of a piece only a few inches long with "stock" 3/4" thickness called out. My point is, are you asking your machinist to verify that every piece of 3/4" stock he uses is flat to that tolerance and also that it is within the thickness standards for whatever association makes the standards of form for that particular stock material? Otherwise how can you justify putting both pieces of information on the drawing?

On the drawings I'm doing/correcting I've started calling out flatness of 1mm in the free state for the longer 1/4" plate pieces and eliminating flatness tolerance callouts entirely where "stock" thickness callouts also exist.

Thanks,

RE: flatness tolerances for "stock" material

Can you use three equally spaced out Datums pads on the surface? Then the control those three pads with a surface profile. Then let the rest of the surface have the stock flatness to it? Would these help your situation?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources