×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Merits and Demerits of using Rational Formula

Merits and Demerits of using Rational Formula

Merits and Demerits of using Rational Formula

(OP)
Dear All,

I have designed a sewerage network of a small catchment(less than 200 hectare) using maximum value of the run off based on Rational Formula. The pipes were sized using Manning Equation.

Now I am trying to understand the merits and demerits of using Rational Formula and Manning Equation, any other formula which could have been used for run off estimation.

Please can anyone suggests some points in this regard.

Regards


RE: Merits and Demerits of using Rational Formula

Palta79,
There have been extensive discussions on this site as to the pros and cos for the rational method including its limitations. The term "small catchment" is a relative term depending on the actual size of your catchment. For the rational method, I have seen in literature the cut off to be anywhere between 160 to 200 acres. That's only 65 - 80 hectares more or less.

Look up the following threads for initial search: thread194-174764: New to urban drainage design, struggling with general design procedure and/or thread162-198581: Volume of Runoff Rational Method Formula

It would appear to me that based on your "size" description, that you may need to look at a different method.

RE: Merits and Demerits of using Rational Formula

I have worked for agencies where the cutoff was 640 acres, this is set by local ordinance and based on that size, 200 hectares is well within possible limitations of the method. However there may be better, simple methods than rational for this project.

RE: Merits and Demerits of using Rational Formula

CVG,
Very true, it all depends on the local agencies and I have seen the area cut off with different area cut offs. As an example the 160 Acre came from a state agency. I do have to mention again and I agree with you that a different method may be in line for this one.

RE: Merits and Demerits of using Rational Formula

In 1989 I prepared a storm drainage master plan for a small rural community that is adjacent to and down slope of an interstate freeway. As part of my research I obtained the 1960s era storm drainage study prepared by the California Department of Transportation for the freeway. The Caltrans study was primarily devoted to sizing culverts under the freeway. Imagine my surprise when I discovered that they had applied the Rational Method to a watershed measuring just over 5 square miles immediately upstream of my study area and to even larger watersheds that were outside my study area. I "reverse engineered" their time of concentration results and determined that they had used the Kirpich Equation.

==========
"Is it the only lesson of history that mankind is unteachable?"
--Winston S. Churchill

RE: Merits and Demerits of using Rational Formula

(OP)
Thank you all for your response.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources