×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

CMU wall mortar strength, field test data

CMU wall mortar strength, field test data

CMU wall mortar strength, field test data

(OP)
We have specified mortar mix strength of 1800 psi. But for several times, the field test data shows those mortar sample has only about 1200 to 1500 psi per ASTM C780. I checked online it seems a quite common situation.
Can anybody have some reference for that? What is minimum strength we can accept?

Thanks.

RE: CMU wall mortar strength, field test data

What is the need and basis for the mortar strength?

ASTM 780 is for pre-construction approvals and not site testing.

Did you specify the mortar based on EITHER proportions or performance (lab tests)? - You cannot use a combination!

If you look at ASTM 270 (Appendix note #1), you will find a recommendation to use the weakest mortar necessary to carry the "structural" loads because there are many properties for mortar (workability and others) that are more important than a simplistic lab compressive strength. The big challenge is to produce a field sample that can be cured and tested in a lab that is representative of actual construction.

From a structural strength, mortar strength is really not important in the strength of a wall. I have made hollow block prisms with 1800 psi mortar than tested at over 4800 psi (f'm) because the masonry unit controls the compressive strength and not the mortar.

The PCA reference noted earlier is fairly good in that it alludes to the aspect ratio of a specimen (cube with shear as the failure measurement) in comparison with a real life situation of a 3/8" joint that is much wider that is put into a situation of direct compression with stronger(intentionally) units with a different failure mechanism.

Dick

Engineer and international traveler interested in construction techniques, problems and proper design.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources