×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Piston structure design

Piston structure design

Piston structure design

(OP)
After having combustion on the mind for a short time again lead me into thinking about pistons and heat transfer and everything else involved. After reading and thinking, the heat distribution of a forged unit will be better than that of a cast unit. I am more interested in the Diesel piston design but am still open to gasser piston design as well. Recently I have been reading on the trunk type, as well as the articulated types both heavy truck and light duty diesel engines. Currently the hot light duty unit seems to be the Mahle Monotherm which is up against Federal Mogul's MonoSteel. As far as what goes into a piston and what we can to to influence condition is the chamber as far as temperature and power production and emissions too.

Right now I am thinking, through the selection of the right material parts and materials they are made of, we can control our heat absorption and dissipation in the crown and other surfaces to get the last little bit of power ouf of the chamber without melting things. Pretty much thinking about just moving slightly closer to a adiabatic process. I know that won't be achieved through the ICE fully but I am thinking we can come closer and be more efficient. However I am not sure how the longevity is going to be effected directly even when/if we have a finer tuned level of control on the temperature of our piston crown.

I would like pick anyone's brain on what they thought of my thoughts.

Thanks,
Jim

RE: Piston structure design

Well for a high power density (knock limited) Otto engine at least, you want the piston crown to run as cool as feasible, at least at high load, to help with knock margin.

"Schiefgehen will, was schiefgehen kann" - das Murphygesetz

RE: Piston structure design

Well obviously the higher the temperature the crown will resist and the lower the thermal conductivity the better.

Also the lower the surface area the better.

Steel for the crown would seem a good choice, but a really tough ceramic might be better in a multi piece piston.

While a flat top design offers lowest area for a piston, when you consider the piston and chamber combined, a small flatish dome chamber and a small dished piston would be best. You also need to consider squish and then you really start to make compromises and the differences between diesel and SI start to become more apparent as flame travel or retaining stratified layers become important in one or the other.

Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules

RE: Piston structure design

"heat distribution of a forged unit will be better than that of a cast unit"

I'm not sure I'd think that was necessarily true, even for the improbability of identically dimensioned parts, and after reading the TRW literature of the 1960s that made that very claim for their "powerforged" pistons.

RE: Piston structure design

(OP)
Pat, I totally forgot about surface area in general lol dangit.

Tmoose, what you are saying, with a forged piece there could be a cast unit (or casting process) with just as well of a heat flow even though that grain structure is tighter in a forged piece or some forgings just dont flow as well as one would think? Thats definitely something for me to check out some more.

RE: Piston structure design

If NASA can be trusted to know or find out about piston manufacturing, the 3 predominant cast piston alloys are on page 4 of this 15 year old document.

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.g...

It also says that "By the late 1980's, the production of hypereutectic AI-Si pistons has dominated the manufacture of AIuminum
pistons. Presently, the standard hypereutectic AI-Si alloy for the industry is the A390 alloy. "

It lists some chemistry and tensile strength info, but no thermal conductivity info.

A quick search for thermal conductivity (and expansion) of MS75 ( a dark gray forging alloy used by TRW/SpeedPro/ etc)., Mahle's forging alloys ( they say Power Pak pistons are predominately made from 4032 aluminum alloy) 2618-T61 (Bill Miller's stated favorite) , came up pretty thin.

RE: Piston structure design

I know this is a bit of a cop out answer and not at all scientific enough to satisfy my normal standards BUT.

Aluminium pistons have been around for about 100 years I think, so there has been plenty of development time and I am sure intense interest from a huge number of people in gaining improvements.

There are quite a few different alloys used and they certainly have quite a range of different thermal characteristics re co-efficient of expansion initial strength and degradation of strength with increase of temperature. These differences are well documented, especially the co-efficient of thermal expansion as they are critical to successful application.

A lack of data re thermal conductivity leads me to PRESUME that it is not a critical property or at least there is not enough variation to make the variation critical.

Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules

RE: Piston structure design

Jim,

The advantage of steel pistons for high BMEP DI diesel service is their much greater elevated temp fatigue strength, especially around the bowl edges. The Monotherm and Monosteel steel pistons are both excellent designs, with good reliability, light weight and low cost. The only real difference being the Monosteel design is friction welded from two pieces and the Monotherm design is a single piece forging. Aluminum pistons are acceptable for small bore DI diesel service with BMEP rates up to about 200 bar. But these aluminum pistons still require a ferrous insert for the top ring groove.

Both the Monotherm and Monosteel pistons have a large "cocktail shaker" type oil gallery for cooling. While one purpose for this oil gallery is cooling of the crown, the most important function is keeping the top ring cool enough so that the lube oil in the groove does not form deposits.

Good luck.
Terry

RE: Piston structure design

Quote (tbuelna)

Aluminum pistons are acceptable for small bore DI diesel service with BMEP rates up to about 20 bar.
FIFY! thumbsup2

"Schiefgehen will, was schiefgehen kann" - das Murphygesetz

RE: Piston structure design

hemi- Thanks! I should not attempt to think and type at the same time. What I should have said was aluminum pistons are generally acceptable for small bore DI diesel service with max combustion pressures around 2000 psi.

RE: Piston structure design

(OP)
Yeah, I am just searching to see whats what Pat. Thanks for posting the Nasa doc Tmoose that will help out my curiousity here. If the oil cooling gallery is crucial for crown cooling, wouldn't the distance from the crown surface to top ring be around the same level of importance as the distance between the top ring and the oil gallery too Terry?

RE: Piston structure design

Quote (FahlinRacing)

.....If the oil cooling gallery is crucial for crown cooling, wouldn't the distance from the crown surface to top ring be around the same level of importance as the distance between the top ring and the oil gallery too Terry?

FR- Not exactly. The piston conductive heat transfer path for the ring is through the lower groove land surface where it contacts the ring, across the piston wall thickness behind the groove, and into the agitated oil mass passing over the gallery surface. The piston conductive heat transfer path from the crown to the oil gallery is simply across the crown thickness. However, there is some benefit to increasing the distance from the piston deck to the top ring, because it allows the gallery oil to more effective cool the outer circumference of the piston crown, thus minimizing the heat flow into the top ring area. The steel piston crown can tolerate much higher operating temperatures than the top ring can.

Best regards,
Terry

RE: Piston structure design

(OP)
Interesting, from how I am interpreting here the heat removal is far more efficient than through metal to metal transfer?
I have a old Cummins dump truck piston which is a trunk type. Has the ni-resist top ring land.

RE: Piston structure design

The importance of oil gallery cooling is strongly linked to the power density of the application. While undercrown oil squirters are generally used on modern diesel engines, the cooling gallery in the piston is an optional feature that the sectioned piston above evidently does not have. From that I would surmise that the application of this piston is not very high power density, at least by modern standards.

"Schiefgehen will, was schiefgehen kann" - das Murphygesetz

RE: Piston structure design

Quote (FahlinRacing)

Interesting, from how I am interpreting here the heat removal is far more efficient than through metal to metal transfer? I have a old Cummins dump truck piston which is a trunk type. Has the ni-resist top ring land.

Fahlin Racing,

The picture you posted illustrates part of the problem concerning thermal management in a high BMEP diesel piston. While an aluminum piston structure would have better thermal conductivity across the crown wall thickness than a steel piston structure, the aluminum piston would also need to run at less than half the crown surface temperatures as the steel piston, and the crown wall thickness of the aluminum piston would also need to be much greater due to its lower fatigue stress limits. The primary heat transfer path in aluminum piston example you show is from the crown to the skirt. That is why the sections are so heavy.

When comparing aluminum and steel pistons, we must consider the entire process for heat transfer in the piston structure. There are the variables of thermal conductivity in the material, allowable operating temperatures at the crown surface, thickness of the crown wall, and temperature delta across the crown wall.

Lastly, you should also look closely at the design of the Monotherm or Monosteel piston oil galleries. These oil galleries are designed to retain a small volume of oil within the gallery space and agitate it back and forth for an extended period before it is discharged. This way as much heat as possible is transferred into the oil, and the mass flow of oil required for piston cooling is minimized.

RE: Piston structure design

(OP)
Sorry I left out a word or two in my last post...
......here the heat removal.... by a liquid...is far more efficient than through metal to metal transfer?

I noticed Charles Fayette Taylor states with aluminum trunk pistons first quote is apparently for small bore unsuprcharged engines... "For this type of cooling aluminum is desirable, with generous sections for heat conduction from the center of the piston head..... Heat conduction to the cylinder walls is promoted by small skirt clearances. Rings run cooler as the top "land" (distance from the top edge of the piston to top ring) is increased."

Now a few sentences later in the next paragraph about supercharged and diesel engine pistons about the oil speed in the gallery of the crown...
"For oil cooled pistons the rate of oil circulation must ne high enough to avoid breakdown of the oil into cabronaceous deposits"

I think the first quote can be used with more than just small bores, should be able to use it with most aluminum trunk style pistons but thats only my thought. You guys have posted some things I will keep reading them over and over and hoepfully some more pops in my brain. Hope this weekend goes well for you guys!

RE: Piston structure design

(OP)
Glad you posted the 2-cycle Tmoose, thank you. I haven't investigated the whole 2-cycle world yet, Pretty kool test piston on page 4. I think I will look into some of that for my bookshelf.

RE: Piston structure design

There are some other 60s and 70s SAE papers, articles by the late great Gordon Jennings, and a copy of his 2 stroke tuner's handbook on that vintagesleds.com link. plenty of engine theory there, much of which has stood up fairly well.

RE: Piston structure design

Hey Moose- I think you just spoiled my day- I didn't know that Jennings had passed away. Fortunately, though, Kevin Cameron is still cranking out great technical writing- I just read an excellent article by him about the Guzzi 500cc V8 (~1957/58).

RE: Piston structure design

(OP)
Anyone have a thought on how the crown design can affect induction and exhausting processes?

RE: Piston structure design

Well on a 4 stroke it might limit valve opening during overlap. It might also shroud airflow across the chamber during overlap. Once the piston moves say 1/4 of a valve dia down the bore I doubt it has any influence.

Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules

RE: Piston structure design

In addition to affecting intake/exhaust processes a severe piston dome/crown can lengthen the path the flame must travel and change the best ignition timing. Generally requires more advance, in turn requiring a reduction in compression ratio for the same fuel octane.

http://s3.racingjunk.com/ui/2/27/26551272-313-Manl...
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51w4lXJeDKL....

Early days racing small block Chevies and Hemis ran over 40 degrees BTDC.
For years recommended 38 max for their big block wedge engines, and 35 for the 426 Hemi.

Nowadays with flatter more compact chambers and organic piston domes mid 30s is just right.

RE: Piston structure design

Flame propagation and airflow are two quite separate things but Tmoose is correct.

I once saw a very high dome SBC piston looking for over 15:1 static compression using methanol for fuel.

He needed 60 deg advance and did not make the power of the previous engine with 13:1, same heads cam etc.

We put small slots in the piston dome adjacent to the spark plug tip to get the flame to cross the chamber while approaching TDC. We lost a few decimal points in compression but reduced optimum timing to 40 deg and picked up considerable power.

Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules

RE: Piston structure design

What Pat says is classic. Domes especially, but all piston top complications tend to dampen swirl, slow flame speed, lengthen the burn time, requiring more advance and losing power and ejecting more heat into the piston and chamber walls. But, there are always trade offs, especially with direct injection which loves a piston bowl and with squish created by piston dome vs chamber wall and other special circumstances.

RE: Piston structure design

(OP)
I would figure tall domes would impede on flow to a point, just curious if deep bowls and motion within the chamber could influence a miss-direction of exiting flow.

RE: Piston structure design

A dome really can't impede airflow all that much unless it also has deep valve relief pockets. When the piston is near the valves, the valve lift is still quite low and unless there is a deep pocket, the piston will be well clear of the chamber in the region close to the valve seat.

Of course if there are deep valve reliefs in the piston, the sides of that relief can certainly interfere with flow.

Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules

RE: Piston structure design

These piston and chamber shape issues require a lot of modeling and burn visualization. Getting this right is one of the biggest contributors to the great advances in engine power and efficiency today compared to the classic musclecar days.

RE: Piston structure design

Consider also top ring placement and piston crown diameter. There's 1-2% power increase and fuel consumption reduction compared to OEM offerings.------Phil

RE: Piston structure design

Forgive me negleted to include that those gains are achieved by crevice volume reduction.----Phil

RE: Piston structure design

Also failed to mentioned reduction in unburned hydrocarbon count.-------Phil

RE: Piston structure design

(OP)
Would you SMokey44211 say that the crevice volume create a area where a quenching action would be created and contain most of the burn in the central crown area?

RE: Piston structure design

What happens is some of the air/fuel charge gets trapped in the cevice volume. As the force of compression rises more is trapped. After ignition event still more. If we are using conventional rings, especially at light throttle, some is going to escape past the rings contaminatting oil supply. One of the reasons I'm a big fan of gapless rings. After exhaust valve opens some of the trapped air/fuel is now liberated and does burn but it doesn't provide any usefull work. If you look at a temperature map of a post combustion piston crown highest temps. are in the center with a bias towards exhaust valve side. One of the ways to reduce crevice volume is to simply put a 30deg. chamfer on the edge of the crown. As of this date on a normally asperated hypertunatic 3.5" bore piston .060" top of ring to edge of chamfer has held up with no signs of distress. Time and budgett hasn't allowed me to test to the point of destruction but any gains at this point will be very small and I don't think its worth the risk. I also think that with FEA and modern machining techniques that some steel alloy should be revisited as the parent piston material for a spark ignition engine. The weight penalty normally associated with its use could be reduced enough to make it a viable option.-------Phil

RE: Piston structure design

I don't know for sure but I suspect that the Cummins ISL-G stoichiometric EGR natural gas engine uses steel piston crowns, due to the high operating temperatures. Of course, it is based on a diesel engine design and operates in the same rpm range as the diesel counterpart, so the technology is not a big stretch. The cost would be higher than a conventional Ni-resist insert cast aluminum piston.

"Schiefgehen will, was schiefgehen kann" - das Murphygesetz

RE: Piston structure design

Smokie, I think the industry trend is to lighter pistons and rods. A piston is a dynamic structure where strength-to-weight is everything. Steel is always going to be more than twice as heavy as Aluminum. The penalty for this should mean heavier rods and crank and a heavier engine overall. Also, the poorer heat conductivity would make for a hotter crown, which would seem to be anathema for a SI engine.

RE: Piston structure design

140, your strength to weight argument for aluminum applies for temperatures where aluminum is in posession of its nominal strength. As temperature increases, aluminum's advantage is eroded, relative to steel, and eventually, is forfeit.
The thermal conductivity argument is valid, but is trumped by the need for a piston that can at least survive the operating conditions. A hotter bulk temperature of the crown can theoretically be offset by a thinner section combined with judicious oil cooling, resulting in an acceptable combustion surface temperature. Not saying aluminum is always inferior to steel, only that for some applications steel may be a better choice.

"Schiefgehen will, was schiefgehen kann" - das Murphygesetz

RE: Piston structure design

hemi, I certainly agree that there could be applications where steel is better. This is in fact the case for some high performance diesel engines like the Audi LeMans diesel. However, what you say about Aluminum losing strength normally applies only to the center of the crown. The rest of the piston has the full strength-to-weight advantage of Aluminum. The weakness at the center of the crown means the whole crown has to be thicker and heavier than otherwise needed, but this is mitigated in many modern designs and in racing designs, like F1, with (perhaps copious) oil cooling of a thin crown. IMVHO, steel will never be a preferred material for SI pistons.

RE: Piston structure design

(OP)
You mean they won't bring back the Chevy Stovebolt's trunk style steel pistons? lol darnit guys. Happy New year! I have some reading an thinking from what you guys have posted. Great thoughts!!

RE: Piston structure design

140, can't argue with anything in your last post. Only thing I will add is, steel would be more robust against failure due to knock (i.e. due to localized high temperature & stress), but that by itself would probably not be enough justification for steel in a commmercial (vs. racing) application.

"Schiefgehen will, was schiefgehen kann" - das Murphygesetz

RE: Piston structure design

From the 1942 factory Chevrolet Shop Manual found here -
http://chevy.oldcarmanualproject.com/shop/1942_47/...
"Chevrolet pistons are cast iron surface treated, with a slipper skirt. "
However it also says "The truck piston may be identified by a small forged boss on the lower center of each piston pin boss."
Forged iron? I don't think so.

The 1949-1953 Chevy Shop Manual says the first use of aluminum pistons (instead of cast iron) was the 1953 Powerglide models.
http://chevy.oldcarmanualproject.com/shop/1949_53/...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources