×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Evaluation of Existing Hoist Beams and Crane Runways

Evaluation of Existing Hoist Beams and Crane Runways

Evaluation of Existing Hoist Beams and Crane Runways

(OP)
I am evaluating, from a condition assessment point of view, numerous hoist beams and crane runways in an old industrial facility.
They are all under 5 tons I believe, but I am wondering what is the consensus of the group regarding labeling or identification of the beam capacity.

My concern is that if the beams are not labeled with the allowable safe load or the allowable maximum hoist size, that they may be inadvertently overloaded by workers.
In one case I saw a hoist beam and nearby were several hoists of different sizes (1/2 ton, 1 ton, 2 ton) hanging on the wall. Clearly they were in the habit of using whatever hoist suited their purpose and perhaps with little regard for the actual capacity of the beam.

Anyway the recommendation I am considering is that the hoist beams be evaluated and that the safe load capacity be indicated on the beam or recorded somewhere. If the client can produce engineering for the beam I think that is acceptable but in some cases the beams look to be rather improvised and I rather doubt there was any engineering involved.

Thanks all.

RE: Evaluation of Existing Hoist Beams and Crane Runways

Usually I've educated the client on their total bridge runway capacity based upon the types and numbers of bridge cranes they have running on the beams.

I usually don't recommend pasting a load on the side of the beams as this can many times be mis-interpreted by the users.

The client will typically have set bridges/hoist capacities already in place or desired to have in place and with that I check the beams based on current codes and the appropriate loadings.

The difficulty with multiple bridges on one craneway is how to control the spacing limits of the bridges as they are used. Some newer bridge models come with motion eyes that measure proximity of one bridge to another and can shut off the trolley motor if two bridges get too close. The client can be told, for example, that his three 5 ton cranes can all use the craneway but cannot be closer than one full span...or something like that. Other means are horizontal arms that keep a set distance between bridges but the impact of these, if mis-used, can possibly damage the bridge trolleys and motors.

In some cases, particular beam spans have less capacity that others and you could suggest/recommend to the client replacing or strengthening the beams to create a uniform level of capacity along the craneway length.



Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources