×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Flash drum separation calcs

Flash drum separation calcs

Flash drum separation calcs

(OP)
Hi all,

I'm hoping someone can point me in the right direction with the following.

I'm calculating the separation of a flash drum for use in a produced water treatment facility (oil refining). The water has been through primary treatment and the components left to be removed are some volatile organics (o-xylene, m-xylene, e-benzene and 1,2,3trimethylbenzene).

In order to calculate the degree of flash and mol fractions/flows I have utilised the Antoine equation to get my ki values and Rachford Rice equation to find my percent vapourised. The drum will operate at 77 degrees Celsius and 402 mbar-a (I have found data that will fit in these ranges).

The problem I have is that water makes up over 99.99 % of my feed (mole %) and hence it dominates the calculations. This hence makes my fraction of feed that is vapourised massively incorrect. After the flash drum the vapour will be condensed and pass through to a vacuum system and after flash has occurred, sent to flare. Can anyone advise on how it would be best for me to proceed? Some assumptions perhaps? Thank you in advance.

RE: Flash drum separation calcs

Hey Harry,

I think a Henry's law assumption would be better than Antoines at such concentrations. You could also simplify your flashed vapor fraction to just assume water for any significant vaporization.

If the hydrocarbon concentration is enough to form a 2nd liquid phase then it will totally change the nature of your flash calculation.

Some real process conditions would make it easier to comment.

best wishes,
sshep

RE: Flash drum separation calcs

Sshep is right

When you have dilute solutions you need henrys law.. but heres the rub.. I've stuggled to get henrys law constant data..So no point using it unless you have the constants - it wont change you answers ! .. that sounds obvious..but i've seen many simulations with people confident they have used henrys law.. then i ask thats great..where are your constants and did you regress / measure them.. or get them from a databank.. then i get a blank look !
if you have aspen 7.3 the NIST engine has a lot of data which can be regressed..

another way..its not ideal.. but an EOS model is better than idea because you dont need henrys constant data..it wont be as accurate but a good start point..

another method i've used. (physcial property people may look on with horror here..) but if i dont have any Henrys constant data i find a similar chemical and use that..for a estiamte to bound my solution.. it is better than no data..again used that with the EOS to bound my solution..

i've probably not helped loads but at least give some background.

RE: Flash drum separation calcs

(OP)
Hi both,

Thank you for your input sshep and James. Apologies for being vague on the process conditions, I opted for assuming the feed was entirely water and the calcs started to behave. Thanks again for your help guys.

Harry

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources