×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

P-Delta Question

P-Delta Question

P-Delta Question

(OP)
Basic question...

If using P-Delta analysis for a secondary analysis is the general rule of thumb that the P-Delta effects only need to be accounted for in the Lateral Force Resisting System (LFRS)?

In other words, secondary members like girts, purlins, or infill beams that are "along for the ride" don't need to be considered in a secondary analysis do they?

My issue is not exactly this straight forward, but....

RE: P-Delta Question

(OP)
second-order, not "secondary"...sorry.

RE: P-Delta Question

Toad:

I don't think that is true if the beams or purlins that take gravity and lateral loads are part of a frame that sees additional lateral deflection due to P-Delta effects.

Othwewise, I would tend to agree.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
http://mmcengineering.tripod.com

RE: P-Delta Question

(OP)
Well, anyone out there designing purlins or girts using a second order analysis?
Seems ridiculous.

RE: P-Delta Question

Toad,
I have been designing grits and purlins for a long time and never considered them in the second order analysis. This is assuming that the grits and purlins are not carrying compressive forces that would have any effect on the stability of the system (i.e. only used as beams spanning from main member to main member)

RE: P-Delta Question

Just for the record I have been designing "girts" not "grits". Sometimes I really hate the spell check on apple products!

RE: P-Delta Question

"grits" is a perfectly good word.

BA

RE: P-Delta Question

It sounds as if you are performing a lateral load analysis on a structure and are performing a second-order analysis to determine whether the structure has sufficient strength and stiffness to withstand the applied loads (lateral loads + gravity loads). If that is the case, then you need only consider the second-order effects on those members that are part of the lateral load resisting system. Floor beams and other members that are "along for the ride" and do not contribute to the global structural stability do not have to be analyzed in the second-order stability analysis (and I am not sure how they would be analyzed anyway, since they are not part of the lateral load resisting system). Your comment that your issue is "...not exactly this straightforward..." tells me that there is something else going on. What is the missing piece of the puzzle? If a member is bracing another heavily loaded member and that brace is subjected to significant second-order effects then you could have a problem. You can't have wimpy braces. I think there was a bridge constructed in Quebec in 1907 that collapsed during construction because braces bracing the main members had insufficent strength and stiffness.

RE: P-Delta Question

I take p-delta effects into account whenever there is a "P" in combination with a "delta"

RE: P-Delta Question

(OP)
Basically what I have is a series of T-shaped frames that form a canopy with roof purlins spanning over top. The frames are cantilevered and designed for lateral stability in both directions.

For various reasons the structure is not perfectly symmetrical. As a result, there is some differential lateral deflections in the model that results in bending of the purlins, primarily weak axis bending. A P-Delta analysis exacerbates the problem. I plan to stiffen the frames so as to mitigate this "secondary" effect but this all got me wondering if it was legitimate to ignore these "secondary" effects in the purlins. Hell, a few years back, I would have designed the frames and purlins independently and not take the interaction into account anyway! I realize that as a structural system this is a real phenomena, but I am not sure if it is necessary to go this far.

RE: P-Delta Question

Chapter C of the AISC spec states when P-Δ and P-δ analyses are required.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources