×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Unit confusion

Unit confusion

Unit confusion

(OP)
Can anyone help with units required when using body loads?

My model is in mm, and force units are Newtons. E is in N/mm2.

My mass density is 7.85E-6 kg/mm3.

To analyze the vehicle under 1g loading due to self weight, what should my translational acceleration be? And what units?

Thanks in advance.

tg

RE: Unit confusion

g = 9810 mm/sec^2

RE: Unit confusion

btw, note the unit "confusion" with N/mm^2 ... N = kg.m/sec^2 ...
so (rho*V)*g = kg/mm^3*mm^3*mm/sec^2 ...

looking at it that way you're better off with m/sec^2 so you get "clean" N as weight ...

(kg/mm^3*mm^3)*m/sec^2 = kg*m/sec^2 = N

clear as mud !?

RE: Unit confusion

(OP)
rb,

Are you saying I should use 9.81?

I think you're right, because when I had g as 9810, my model had the erroneously input mass density of 7.85 E-9 !!

And all my runs were giving correct reactions in Newtons (I think). The errors were canceling each other out.

The issue started becoming real when I tried a problem with rotational acceleration (rad/sec^2).

No canceling out, and mass confusion ensued(pun intended...)

tg

RE: Unit confusion

i can't see a problem with my 2nd post, so yes i think you can mix units carefully so long as the final dimensions are correct (N = kg*m/sec^2).

work through a problem that you can solve and Know the right answer.

RE: Unit confusion

here's a link discussing this ...

http://www.endurasim.com.au/web_images/EnDuraSim-E...

they "go on" about using consistent units, that if you model in mm then your acceleration should be in mm/sec^2 and density should be tonne/mm^3 (1000kg/mm^3) so that the force units sort themselves out ... N = (tonne/mm^3*mm^3)*mm/sec^2 = tonne*mm/sec^2 = kg*m/sec^2.

this approach is obvious Correct, a little pedantic IMHO if you're doing routine analysis where i think you can mix units (density in kg/mm^3, accel in m/sec^2). but you have to becareful ... i think you'll get into trouble if you have rotational accel, ie places where you aren't combining denisty and linear accel.

on the whole, it is better practice to use consistent units.

RE: Unit confusion

(OP)
rb,

Thank you for setting me straight. I was using consistent units in 95% of the work, prior to yesterday.

I'll go back to consistent units:

Length mm
g=9806 mm/s2
All masses in MT
Mass density in MT/mm3
Stress in N/mm2
Forces in N

Great link by the way...

tg

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources