×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Symmetry in modal analysis

Symmetry in modal analysis

Symmetry in modal analysis

(OP)
Hello everyone, this is my first thread

I had this project recently where I had to perform modal analysis in Ansys. The geometry and the loading was symmetric in one plane. Initially I performed a full model analysis and I extracted the natural frequencies and mode shapes. I was only interested in the first mode because the project specified that the componend was moving axially (in Y axis)and that was represented in that mode. Also the result of the natural frequency lied in the frequency range specified in the project.
Then I tried to run the same analysis but only this time i used half model. What i observed is that the first mode gave almost the exact same result with the full model.
When i looked about this I found out that symmetry is not recommended for moadal analysis. But in this case could I use half model if I am only interested in that mode?

Thank you in advance

RE: Symmetry in modal analysis

"symmetry is not recommended for moadal analysis"

This is because the use of symmetery excludes non-symmetric modes. You can use symmetric models, but have to be careful about the conclusions you draw.

Take a simply-supported beam, being analysed for bending modes. You could model half of the beam (from one support to the midpoint), and put a symmetry condition at the midpoint - this would have the effect of restraining the midplane of the beam to not rotate. This symmetric model would give correct results for the 1st bending mode (where the beam essentially just forms a U-shape) because there is no rotation of the midpoint in that mode. But the 2nd mode, where the beam forms a ~ shape, does involve rotation of the midplane, is precluded by the symmetry boundary condition, and would not be extractable from the symmetric model. For the symmetric model, the reported 2nd mode would look like the 3rd mode (W shape). So, if you were not careful, you might miss some things from the symmetric model.

RE: Symmetry in modal analysis

(OP)
Thank you for your posts!
These have been really helpful!

RE: Symmetry in modal analysis

I not recommend to use simetry in modal analysis, when you run a simulation like this, and solve for, for saying, 10 normal modes, the non-symmetric modes are wrong at all, so if you gonna run a modal analysis using symmetry be careful with your results, use the entire model

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources