×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Offset Surcharge on Broken Back Slope - Boussinesq / Elastic Methods

Offset Surcharge on Broken Back Slope - Boussinesq / Elastic Methods

Offset Surcharge on Broken Back Slope - Boussinesq / Elastic Methods

(OP)
When you have an offset surcharge on top of a broken back slope and using elastic methods, such as boussinesq, do you adjust the angles to the load accordingly and apply the formulas as normal? or do you apply the surcharge at the top of the wall elevation and apply the soil as an overburden pressure? Or model the slope to get an active pressure of the soil and model the surcharge at the elevation of the wall basically disregarding the fact that it is on top of the slope?

Thanks!

EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com

RE: Offset Surcharge on Broken Back Slope - Boussinesq / Elastic Methods

I do a trial wedge to get the load in that situation.

RE: Offset Surcharge on Broken Back Slope - Boussinesq / Elastic Methods

(OP)
This actually relates to my other post and those retaining walls. Do you think they (the reviewing engineers) would except a trial wedge analysis?

EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com

RE: Offset Surcharge on Broken Back Slope - Boussinesq / Elastic Methods

I don't see why they wouldn't accept it. It is a perfectly valid analytical tool. It does give active loads so I might bump them up a bit simply because it is a railroad up there. I have found the BNSF reviewers to be pretty reasonable folks when I have dealt with them.

RE: Offset Surcharge on Broken Back Slope - Boussinesq / Elastic Methods

The UPRR and BNSF shoring manuals will provide some guidance. Any excavation within a 2:1 influence line needs to be shored per their guidelines which will be a pain. The 1.5 influence line is for the RR loading so you will be close on that if you can not get gravity walls to work. Their E-80 loading is something like 1778 psf over a 9' tie width as I recall so it will be appreciable if you have to account for it.

I have used other methods but you need to use their loading or get ready for a big fight. I have not found RR people to be reasonable as a rule so it really depends on who the approving engineer is.

RE: Offset Surcharge on Broken Back Slope - Boussinesq / Elastic Methods

(OP)
ahh, I see. The UPRR distributes the strip load due to the rail down at a 2V:1H to the top of the wall and then uses the modified boussinesq equation. So I guess the general answer to my question is to distribute the vertical load down at some angle then recalc your strip load and apply the appropriate equation (i.e. Boussinesq).

For example:
Strip load; q=1000psf
distance to strip load from wall x1 = 10ft
width of strip b = 10ft
height to strip load above wall h1 = 4ft
Slope of surcharge through soil; S=2V:1H


New distance to strip load = x1new = x1 - h1/S
New width of strip load = bnew = (b+2*(h1/S)
Find new strip load
P=q*b => qnew = P/(bnew)
Use 'new' variables in elastic method equation (i.e. Boussinesq)

EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources