No-load engine testing
No-load engine testing
(OP)
Hi everyone,
I'm a long-time reader of this forum (as it pops up in google whenever I search a question) but have one now that I haven't been able to directly find the answer I am looking for.
I am currently in a bit of an argument with a friend. We are building an engine with some design changes for our senior design project (mechanical engineering seniors) and will be testing our engine in comparison to the test results of a baseline engine. (ie: test engine, make changes, re-test).
I am trying to convince that we need to have a dyno of some sort to load the engine. He thinks that a no-load condition will be satisfactory.
We want to find our efficiency so determining HP,Torque, rpm, bsfc, bMEP, etc is ideal.
He wants to run the engine with no load and just see how long it takes to burn through a set amount of fuel.
What do you guys think here?
I'm a long-time reader of this forum (as it pops up in google whenever I search a question) but have one now that I haven't been able to directly find the answer I am looking for.
I am currently in a bit of an argument with a friend. We are building an engine with some design changes for our senior design project (mechanical engineering seniors) and will be testing our engine in comparison to the test results of a baseline engine. (ie: test engine, make changes, re-test).
I am trying to convince that we need to have a dyno of some sort to load the engine. He thinks that a no-load condition will be satisfactory.
We want to find our efficiency so determining HP,Torque, rpm, bsfc, bMEP, etc is ideal.
He wants to run the engine with no load and just see how long it takes to burn through a set amount of fuel.
What do you guys think here?





RE: No-load engine testing
RE: No-load engine testing
RE: No-load engine testing
I think your project advisor would be the best one to set the bar on this.
RE: No-load engine testing
RE: No-load engine testing
----------------------------------------
The Help for this program was created in Windows Help format, which depends on a feature that isn't included in this version of Windows.
RE: No-load engine testing
It can be to drive a flywheel or lift a load via a winch or drive a generator or drive a water pump or drive a vehicle along a specific road in both directions for accuracy.
The load needs to be high enough to test at full throttle for a reasonable time without over speed of the engine. It preferably needs to be variable so you can hold the rpm stable at specified rpm, but if you can have the engine reacting against a load cell while accelerating and you can data log both load and rpm, you effectively have a dyno.
Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules
RE: No-load engine testing
Maybe start by telling your friend to read the instructions?
RE: No-load engine testing
Note that the more-efficient cars' engines on the market today SHUT DOWN instead of idling at no load... at no load you need no engine!
RE: No-load engine testing
For those of you considering the lower rpm loophole to this, the engines would be tested and compared at the same rpm.
RE: No-load engine testing
So
""""with no load you have no brake horsepower, no torque, infinite BSFC (divide by zero), etc. I fail to see what value this has. """""
WHAT? Yeah if its turned off, ie not running. But when it starts there is torque, there is rpm, there is BSFC for the simple fact that the gas starts to disapear. To keep the engine running there is a certain amount of power or torque needed to accomplish that. Agreed its not alot of loading but still it does exist.
RE: No-load engine testing
"Schiefgehen will, was schiefgehen kann" - das Murphygesetz
RE: No-load engine testing
- Steve
RE: No-load engine testing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_effective_pressu...
Brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) - Mean effective pressure calculated from brake power
Indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) - Mean effective pressure calculated from in cylinder pressure, average in cylinder pressure over engine cycle, 720°.
Friction mean effective pressure (FMEP) - Theoretical mean effective pressure required to over come engine friction, can be thought of as mean effective pressure lost due to friction. BMEP = IMEP - FMEP
BSFC is calculated based on BRAKE power, which is what you have left over after you do all the things to keep the bare engine running. At idle, brake power is zero. Yes, the engine still burns fuel.. but the BSFC is indeterminate.
RE: No-load engine testing
Well if that RPM is the idle speed of the baseline engine, then your friend is spot on, you don't need to know anything else. I doubt that's the case.
Next strategy: use as much EGR as possible, let the engine operate at highest safe temperature, and lean it out.
As a side note, you should know by now that there is no such thing as a loophole. Rules are rules, and "not rules" are not rules.
RE: No-load engine testing
If you will excuse the sarcasm, finding the thermal efficiency at the "no load" condition will be both easy and accurate, as it will be (by definition) zero.
In an attempt to be just slightly more helpful: How many cylinders does your engine have? What is the modification that you plan to make? Is qualitative comparison data sufficient to prove your case? (i.e. is this better than that?)
You can make a cheap "load" dyno by running your multi-cylinder engine as a single cylinder test engine with the remaining "unused" cylinders used as a friction load device. The manifold pressure required to achieve a given rpm will increase if you only fire a single cylinder, indicating an increased friction load (on a per fired cylinder basis).
Or, if you want to get a bit fancier, take the spark plugs out of the unused cylinders and replace with a pipe that includes a flow check valve (one-way reed valve or similar). You will get a low cost "jake brake" effect, as the fiction load required to drive the unfired cylinders will go up. Make sure you also defeat the fuel flow to the unfired cylinders, or you make have some nasty surprises.
I hope this was a helpful consideration for single fired cylinder comparative performance testing done on a shoe-string budget.
Dick
RE: No-load engine testing
If you were in industry and your boss was ready to commit millions of dollars to engine modifications, I expect they would dyno the bejesus out of it first. I've worked for places that ate it big because they didn't test new designs.
RE: No-load engine testing
You will need a load on the engine if you want to test/prove anything remotely useful. I will have to disagree with Pat. It can't be an inertia load (ie flywheel). You need a steady load you can apply long enough to do useful measurements.
RE: No-load engine testing
Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules
RE: No-load engine testing
RE: No-load engine testing
Steady readings are fine for validating design requirements. Transient performance is much more interesting, especially with small TC engines.
- Steve
RE: No-load engine testing
Dyno results depend on a lot of engine variables that can change as readings are being taken if the engine is not brought to equilibrium. Likewise, environmental variables contribute to dyno results and have to be accounted for. Ambient temperature, pressure and coolant temperature can be vital and can affect results in unpredictable ways if an engine is not at equilibrium and running on the edge of detonation. Merely applying compensation formulas may not give correct results.
It is generally the case that flash power readings are significantly higher than steady-state. A justification for relying on flash readings is that they may more closely model what happens in a drag race or at stop lights.
RE: No-load engine testing
RE: No-load engine testing
RE: No-load engine testing
Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules
RE: No-load engine testing
RE: No-load engine testing
Even when doing work at idle PAS/AC/Generator loading rigs are used, to give representative conditions ie zero clutch torque with significant accessory loads.
If you decide to continue you really must ensure that spark/air/fuelling are consistent across tests, do not leave it to the idle speed controller!
The best solution I could suggest is to get the biggest controllable loading rigs (as said above) and use these to impart a drag torque on the engine.
Ms
RE: No-load engine testing
- Steve
RE: No-load engine testing
Even still, a helmet is only going to save so much......
Another thing for me is that, bar a few exceptions, gasoline engines only have a low idle speed controller, with a torque reducing Nmax limit. Whereas a diesel has a low & high governor, a small but important difference?
MS