×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Point load on Water Tower Shell
2

Point load on Water Tower Shell

Point load on Water Tower Shell

(OP)
How would you determine the allowable point load on a water tower shell?

1.) Ask a manufacturer (do these exist?)
2.) FEA shell analysis or something along these lines?

Thanks in advance!

EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

If you are facing the problem it is in your interest to get to your own value which normally would be attained by a proper model in a FEM program and of course engineering judgement involving codes and science of construction.

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

(OP)
hmmm... yeah i figured. I would really like to see an example of how that is done.
Currently I don't need to perform the analysis (not in our scope of work) but I could see needing to do this in the future.

EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

Preferably, I would get the original designer or another tank design firm involved. Otherwise, if someone put a gun to my head, I would add another plate of a size that the current plates stresses are insignificant for the new load. I would be worried that if there was damage in the future, you'd be on the hook for that and anything else that happens to the tank.
Also, I'd be worried about welding to a tank. Any coatings, inside and out, will be damaged by welding and have to be repaired.
Our company has turned down this type of work in the past. Cellular phone companies pay big money to attach their stuff to water towers. And the municipalities are very anxious to harvest any dollar they can. But we figured our risk wasn't worth the (small) fee.

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

It may be possible to address local loadings by WRC-297, WRC-107, or similar references. Some of the vessel design handbooks have simplified methods.

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

(OP)
JedClamp - That is basically the situation except the loads have been less than the previous design. The previous design calcs show an "allowable reaction" that just magically appears or I am missing that part of the calc.

JStephen- thanks for the reference.

EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

(OP)
I am still curious about this. Is there a simplified way or even a complex way to analyze a water tower subject to external point loads. Or put another way - Is there a way to analyze a steel 'domed' shaped shell subject to one or many point loads. I'm really interested in a simplified approximate method but I'd be open to complex analysis tool as well.

Jstephen - I started looking for WRC-297 and WRC-107 what are these and where can I find them. I have started searching and have found numerous threads on them but I'm not exactly sure what they are, let alone where to look in them.

Thanks again!

EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

WRC 537 appears to be the current implementation of WRC 107, available here:
http://www.forengineers.org/store.php?crn=55&r...
WRC 297:
http://www.forengineers.org/store.php?crn=65&r...

The basic issue is analyzing pressure vessel shells for external loads applied at piping nozzles. So the shells in question may be cylindrical or F&D heads (treated as spherical), and the attachment may be a pipe or a rigid plug. Assuming some sort of reinforcing pad is used, you then get back to the rigid-plug analysis for a point load. For the full-blown case where you have 6 loads (3 forces, 3 moments) with a nozzle, you wind up doing a lot of graph-reading and interpolating using the older versions. I haven't used he WRC 537, and don't know how easy it is to use. With a water tower, you may run into issues with the t/R ratios being outside the range covered- pressure vessels are usually thicker relative to diameter than a water tower. The data all relate to either cylinders or spheres, and if youj're actually dealing with the knuckle area, wouldn't be strictly applicable. The loading covered is just from external loads, and the stresses due to internal pressure are not covered.

There are pressure vessel design handbooks by Bednar and Megyesy that have simplified versions of this analysis. There is another common pressure vessel handbook by Moss, which I have not used, and I don't know if it includes similar data. Some of the pressure vessel design software has the WRC 107 analysis built into it as well.

The local stresses allowed for external loads are usually fairly high- in excess of yield- assuming that in most cases, the loads are self-limiting, and due to thermal expansion/contraction, etc.

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

(OP)
J - Thanks for the info, I appreciate your thoroughness.

EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

I've done this before. I basically did a FE analysis of the whole thing and used a few different codes to try and set a reasonable stress limit. I can tell you that I didn't find a evaluation system that completely covered the situation. The pressure vessel stuff doesn't quite line up with open vessels, and a lot of the non-pressure vessel stuff is pretty prescriptive and seems to get rather handwavy when you get to point loads or local stresses. In my case it was mostly examining existing items, so there was a greater comfort level that the connected items worked given the history.

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

(OP)
TLHS - I think I would be in a similar boat i.e. existing conditions. What program did you use to model it (I wonder if I could set this up in RISA 3D)? What sort of allowable stress did you determine.

I've seen some calculations come across my desk that give what appears to be an 'allowable point load' in range of 2.5k-3k, but I'm not sure how they derived that or if they are even referencing the shell material.

I'm wondering if I could even use a handbook formula from Rorak or Pilkey for point load on a circular plate. But there are many questions as to what to assume for the diameter and end conditions.
I'm thinking if I could create a model; put some point loads on it; see what stress there are; then try to correlate this to a 'handbook' formula, it may be of some use.

The only problem is - with so much 'approximation' when is this useful. Meaning by engineering judgement and experiences you can say < 3 kips is probably ok for 0.25" thick steel. If its 6 kips well now you may be pushing things. But at the same time I'd "like" to go through the exercise.

EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

How much load?? A 250 fat boy would not scare me - after that I would do a lot of research!!

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

(OP)
Yes, research is what I'm after.
I think I may need to crack open Timeshanko's Theory of Plates and Shells and start learning how to model plate elements.

TLHS - I'm curious to know more about how you modeled this or atleast the program you used. Did you use many flat rectangular plates?

EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

The API has several publications/standards on Low Pressure Storage tanks... LPS tanks. I've been involved with a couple, but for storage of anhydrous ammonia... bigger risk.

Dik

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

My first step was referencing API 650, even though my case wasn't flat bottomed.

I had an overall system FEM plate model using STAAD, which wasn't brilliant for localized stresses. I did some test cases of partial shell high element count models to see the stresses locally. I don't really trust STAAD that much for this kind of thing, though, so to confirm I did some hand checks of block shear failures and local bending on some roughly equivalent flat plates and also using a method for local loads on pipes by M.W. Kellog (the WRC stuff would fill this same general void).

At the end of the day, I believe I used the allowables in API 650 plus some general engineering judgment to come up with an allowable local stress that I was comfortable with.

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

Note that mine was petrochemical related, hence the API standard.

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

When in doubt a reinforcing pad, a straight channel running up and down the cylinder or cone (assuming it's standing on the flat part), a curved beam or some gussets can spread your load pretty easily. Depending on the situation some of these are easy retrofits.

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

I realise that the API is not part of this... but, they have a lot of useful information and details for more critical stuff...

Dik

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

Do a FEM analysis to get the result

anchor bolt design per ACI 318-11 crane beam design
http://www.civilbay.com

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

I tend to agree with Jed.

If you do venture down the analysis route, a word of caution with FEM, have an actual look at the tower. I once spoke with an old engineer who used to work at one of those outfits in his early years, he recalled some being designed as bladders, not shells. A weak point may be at the cradle supports of the bladder.

HTH

VoD

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

Rfreund:
You’ve kept us guessing long enough, why not show us a sketch of the vessel and the actual loads, with some dimensions, etc. Otherwise, I’m guessing one billion tons on a 3/16" plate, 18' high and 200' in dia.

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

I'm betting that one billion tons is a tad on the high side.

BA

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

(OP)
@TLHS - Thanks I really appreciate the info. I will look into the API 650 stuff.

@AMEC - I intend to or atleast try, however I'm not sure I have the software to do so accurately. Any idea on if RISA 3D could give me something reasonable? What program would you use?

DH- I hear ya. I don't mean to keep you guessing, but I don't have a specific project that this is currently applicable. I am anticipating that I will need something in the near future. I will however give some better info. Typically I'd say the point loads are in the range of 1kip - 3kip vertical reaction and 0.5k to 1.5k horizontal reaction. Usually the 'column / leg support' is an angle with a base plate about 10"x10"x1/2" maybe. As for the water tower the tower is usually 40'-80' in the air. Usually domed.

See attached crude sketch.

EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com

RE: Point load on Water Tower Shell

API-650 doesn't have anything useful on point loads. It does have an Appendix P for nozzle loads, but it is restricted to flat-bottom tanks larger than 100' in diameter. (For simplicity, the pressure is assumed proportional to the shell thickness, which is not true for small tanks).

A suggestion on your arrangement: If you have multiple loads in a circular ring, then check total loading on the whole spherical cap of that radius rather than dealing with the point loads. If desired, you could add a circular stiffener around the base of the ring.

Normally, loads applied tangentially to a dome would have low streses and aren't really an issue.

Assuming this is antennas or something similar, you're also increasing the wind loading in the structure and foundation.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources