×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

How to dimension trapezoid part?

How to dimension trapezoid part?

How to dimension trapezoid part?

(OP)
Hi guys,
New here, this is my first post/thread. I just stumbled on a part and I just can't figure out how to dimension it properly in accordance with ASME Y14.5.

(See attachment for drawing) My doubt lies in the 3.625 dimension: everybody knows that symmetry is implied in this part but I really don't know how to dimension its location properly. Should I use a half dim, a profile tolerance or a position tolerance like the 2.200 pocket in the side view? Can I even use the 3.750 hole axis as my symmetry plane?

I asked a couple of engineers here in the company, but none of them had the same answer and GD&T wasn't even close to being addressed.

Thank you for your answers.

(By the way, I'm french speaking so I apologize for any language ambiguities or strange formulations/translations)

Fred

RE: How to dimension trapezoid part?

floide,

A couple of remarks here.

I can see your symmetrical feature, but it is not clear. I might not have spotted it if you had not told us. I would dimension everything, and not force your fabricators to guess.

This looks like a casting that will be machined out a bit. In such a scenario, your very accurate holes are not good datums. They will not be present at your foundry. I strongly recommend that you specify datum targets. Consider modelling in the actual datum features. Now, the foundry and the machinists will be jigging to the same features.

Your bottom datum face looks machined. If so, it is not a good datum either, for the reason noted above.

If you create separate casting and machining drawings, this problem will be obvious to you. This is one of quite a few reasons why you should make separate drawings.

This is not a GD&T issue, but the exising GD&T on your drawing highlights the problem. Can your slot be fabricated (easily)? Your positional tolerance is very tight for (sand?) casting. Making the slot penetrate to the hole is not impossible, but it is not simple, either. Applying good GD&T to fabrication drawings often show up manufacturing issues, which is one reason why you should do it.

--
JHG

RE: How to dimension trapezoid part?

I don't see any issue with the symmetry on the right-side of the part. You have a centerline drawn in and the features appear centered on it. I wouldn't add the half-dimensionm even as a basic dimension.

I would support that cast datums are needed, but on the final part, these datums are fine. The important thing to remember is that you need to tie the machined datums back to the cast ones, as well as controlling the machined datums to higher-precedent machined datums. The tolerances on the machined holes are tight, but achievable.

As for the GD&T, a general surface profile is needed to start with. Datum Feature-B needs to be controlled back to Datum-A. Datum Feature-C needs to be controlled back to Datums A and B. The groove needs to be controlled wrt Datum-C as well. Other than the two holes and the slot, none of these features should have +/- tolerances, and should all be controlled by geometric tolerances.

Jim Sykes, P.Eng, GDTP-S
Profile Services www.profileservices.ca
TecEase, Inc. www.tec-ease.com

RE: How to dimension trapezoid part?

I am with Jim on that.
- No issue with symmetry;
- This approach to tolerancing is nicely shown in fig. 4-9 of Y14.8-2009 standard on "Castings, Forgings, and Molded Parts".
http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=5...

RE: How to dimension trapezoid part?

(OP)
Thanks everyone for your answers.

Maybe I should have pointed this detail earlier. It is true that the part looks like a casting: because it was one. The part actually broke on the machine and we are going to have one machined entirely; no casting involved here. So my datums will actually be available for use.

Fred
Montréal, Qc, Canada

RE: How to dimension trapezoid part?

In this case it is a good idea to follow Jim's (MechNorth's) suggestions except the part of his reply about cast datums.

RE: How to dimension trapezoid part?

Sorry, but unless there are some FCF's for the 3.625 dimension and for the various diameters (other than 3.75 hole) then this part is not fully dimensioned.

So I would say you need to add a position FCF to the 3.625 dimension similar to that for the 2.200 dimension to give some control on just how symmetrical the 3.625 dimension is.

Posting guidelines FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm? (probably not aimed specifically at you)
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?

RE: How to dimension trapezoid part?

The 3.625 isn't a FOS either, Kenat. No clear directly opposed points, so position isn't appropriate. A general surface profile would cover all "non-critical" features, with tighter controls applied as needed.

Jim Sykes, P.Eng, GDTP-S
Profile Services www.profileservices.ca
TecEase, Inc. www.tec-ease.com

RE: How to dimension trapezoid part?

Hard to verify that the points are actually opposed otherwise, Kenat.

Jim Sykes, P.Eng, GDTP-S
Profile Services www.profileservices.ca
TecEase, Inc. www.tec-ease.com

RE: How to dimension trapezoid part?

(OP)

Quote (MechNorth)

The groove needs to be controlled wrt Datum-C as well.

Jim, I don't get why datum C would be required in this case.

Fred
Montréal, Qc, Canada

RE: How to dimension trapezoid part?

Jim,
For those of us still trying to beat this idea in their heads, why does this method actually make finding the opposed points easier?

RE: How to dimension trapezoid part?

floide,
Will this part be anyhow rested against datum feature surface C when mounted in an assembly? If yes, then having C in positional callout for the groove will better reflect function of the component and constrain last degree of freedom left.

Frank,
For profile of surface check, suggested by Jim, you do not have to measure any distance between the two points. You do not have to bother whether they are opposed or not. All you have to do is to verify whether the corners fall within boundaries of profile tolerance zone. Much more practicable and logical than verifying the distance between something that may even not exist in reality due to break edges or fillets (which probably be there due to technological reasons).

RE: How to dimension trapezoid part?

(OP)
pmarc,
No it will not rest against C. I've attached a picture of the assembly for your understanding. The T-slot bolt is pulled upward towards the bottom of the guides on each side and it doesn't touch the bottom of the 2.200 pocket.

For those who are interested, I've also attached the completed drawing to the best of my GD&T understanding. Feel free to comment/ suggest corrections for I am just beginning my, how should I say, "learning of GD&T in applications".

Again, I want to thank everyone for their helpful answers.

Fred
Montréal, Qc, Canada

RE: How to dimension trapezoid part?

Frank; using the long (external) jaws of the caliper (with the flat surfaces) makes it easier to find directly opposed points. Not so much luck on the internal (short) jaws.

Fred; without reference to datum C, the orientation (perpendicularity) of the center plane of the slot is not controlled. This is an assumption that face of datum feature-C is riding on something; if the arm is free-floating on a shaft / pin without contacting on that face, then reference to datum-C is irrelevant.

Jim Sykes, P.Eng, GDTP-S
Profile Services www.profileservices.ca
TecEase, Inc. www.tec-ease.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources